agora inbox for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process
697+ messages / 5 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process
@ 2020-09-03 06:38  torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 697+ messages in thread

From: torikoshia @ 2020-09-03 06:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com>; +Cc: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-09-01 03:29, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
> 
> po 31. 8. 2020 v 17:03 odesílatel Kasahara Tatsuhito
> <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com> napsal:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:22 PM torikoshia
>> <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>>> As discussed in the thread[1], it'll be useful to make it
>>> possible to get the memory contexts of an arbitrary backend
>>> process.
>> +1
>> 
>>> Attached PoC patch makes pg_get_backend_memory_contexts()
>>> display meory contexts of the specified PID of the process.
>> Thanks, it's a very good patch for discussion.
>> 
>>> It doesn't display contexts of all the backends but only
>>> the contexts of specified process.
>> or we can  "SELECT (pg_get_backend_memory_contexts(pid)).* FROM
>> pg_stat_activity WHERE ...",
>> so I don't think it's a big deal.
>> 
>>> The rough idea of implementation is like below:
>>> 
>>> 1. send  a signal to the specified process
>>> 2. signaled process dumps its memory contexts to a file
>>> 3. read the dumped file and display it to the user
>> I agree with the overview of the idea.
>> Here are some comments and questions.

Thanks for the comments!

>> 
>> - Currently, "the signal transmission for dumping memory
>> information"
>> and "the read & output of dump information "
>> are on the same interface, but I think it would be better to
>> separate them.
>> How about providing the following three types of functions for
>> users?
>> - send a signal to specified pid
>> - check the status of the signal sent and received
>> - read the dumped information

Is this for future extensibility to make it possible to get
other information like the current execution plan which was
suggested by Pavel?

If so, I agree with considering extensibility, but I'm not
sure it's necessary whether providing these types of
functions for 'users'.

>> - How about managing the status of signal send/receive and dump
>> operations on a shared hash or others ?
>> Sending and receiving signals, dumping memory information, and
>> referencing dump information all work asynchronously.
>> Therefore, it would be good to have management information to
>> check
>> the status of each process.
>> A simple idea is that ..
>> - send a signal to dump to a PID, it first record following
>> information into the shared hash.
>> pid (specified pid)
>> loc (dump location, currently might be ASAP)
>> recv (did the pid process receive a signal? first false)
>> dumped (did the pid process dump a mem information?  first
>> false)
>> - specified process receive the signal, update the status in the
>> shared hash, then dumped at specified location.
>> - specified process finish dump mem information,  update the
>> status
>> in the shared hash.

Adding management information on shared memory seems necessary
when we want to have more controls over dumping like 'dump
location' or any other information such as 'current execution
plan'.
I'm going to consider this.


>> - Does it allow one process to output multiple dump files?
>> It appears to be a specification to overwrite at present, but I
>> thought it would be good to be able to generate
>> multiple dump files in different phases (e.g., planning phase and
>> execution phase) in the future.
>> - How is the dump file cleaned up?
> 
>  For a very long time there has been similar discussion about taking
> session query and session execution plans from other sessions.
> 
> I am not sure how necessary information is in the memory dump, but I
> am sure so taking the current execution plan and complete text of the
> current query is pretty necessary information.
> 
> but can be great so this infrastructure can be used for any debugging
> purpose.

Thanks!
It would be good if some part of this effort can be an infrastructure
of other debugging.
It may be hard, but I will keep your comment in mind.


Regards,

--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NTT DATA CORPORATION

> 
> Regards
> 
> Pavel
> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> --
>> Tatsuhito Kasahara
>> kasahara.tatsuhito _at_ gmail.com [1]
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://gmail.com





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process
@ 2020-09-03 17:18  Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com>
  parent: torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 697+ messages in thread

From: Kasahara Tatsuhito @ 2020-09-03 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>; +Cc: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:38 PM torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> >> - Currently, "the signal transmission for dumping memory
> >> information"
> >> and "the read & output of dump information "
> >> are on the same interface, but I think it would be better to
> >> separate them.
> >> How about providing the following three types of functions for
> >> users?
> >> - send a signal to specified pid
> >> - check the status of the signal sent and received
> >> - read the dumped information
>
> Is this for future extensibility to make it possible to get
> other information like the current execution plan which was
> suggested by Pavel?
Yes, but it's not only for future expansion, but also for the
usability and the stability of this feature.
For example, if you want to read one dumped file multiple times and analyze it,
you will want the ability to just read the dump.
Moreover, when it takes a long time from the receive the signal to the
dump output,
or the dump output itself takes a long time, users can investigate
where it takes time
if each process is separated.

> If so, I agree with considering extensibility, but I'm not
> sure it's necessary whether providing these types of
> functions for 'users'.
Of course, it is possible and may be necessary to provide a wrapped
sequence of processes
from sending a signal to reading  dump files.
But IMO, some users would like to perform the signal transmission,
state management and
dump file reading processes separately.

Best regards,

-- 
Tatsuhito Kasahara
kasahara.tatsuhito _at_ gmail.com





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process
@ 2020-09-03 17:40  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  parent: Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 697+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2020-09-03 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com>; +Cc: torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>; pgsql-hackers

Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com> writes:
> Yes, but it's not only for future expansion, but also for the
> usability and the stability of this feature.
> For example, if you want to read one dumped file multiple times and analyze it,
> you will want the ability to just read the dump.

If we design it to make that possible, how are we going to prevent disk
space leaks from never-cleaned-up dump files?

			regards, tom lane





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process
@ 2020-09-04 02:47  Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com>
  parent: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 697+ messages in thread

From: Kasahara Tatsuhito @ 2020-09-04 02:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>; pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:40 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com> writes:
> > Yes, but it's not only for future expansion, but also for the
> > usability and the stability of this feature.
> > For example, if you want to read one dumped file multiple times and analyze it,
> > you will want the ability to just read the dump.
>
> If we design it to make that possible, how are we going to prevent disk
> space leaks from never-cleaned-up dump files?
In my thought, with features such as a view that allows us to see a
list of dumped files,
it would be better to have a function that simply deletes the dump
files associated with a specific PID,
or to delete all dump files.
Some files may be dumped with unexpected delays, so I think the
cleaning feature will be necessary.
( Also, as the pgsql_tmp file, it might better to delete dump files
when PostgreSQL start.)

Or should we try to delete the dump file as soon as we can read it?

Best regards,

-- 
Tatsuhito Kasahara
kasahara.tatsuhito _at_ gmail.com





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process
@ 2020-09-04 12:46  Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
  parent: Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Tomas Vondra @ 2020-09-04 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com>; +Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>; pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 11:47:30AM +0900, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:40 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Yes, but it's not only for future expansion, but also for the
>> > usability and the stability of this feature.
>> > For example, if you want to read one dumped file multiple times and analyze it,
>> > you will want the ability to just read the dump.
>>
>> If we design it to make that possible, how are we going to prevent disk
>> space leaks from never-cleaned-up dump files?
>In my thought, with features such as a view that allows us to see a
>list of dumped files,
>it would be better to have a function that simply deletes the dump
>files associated with a specific PID,
>or to delete all dump files.
>Some files may be dumped with unexpected delays, so I think the
>cleaning feature will be necessary.
>( Also, as the pgsql_tmp file, it might better to delete dump files
>when PostgreSQL start.)
>
>Or should we try to delete the dump file as soon as we can read it?
>

IMO making the cleanup a responsibility of the users (e.g. by exposing
the list of dumped files through a view and expecting users to delete
them in some way) is rather fragile.

I don't quite see what's the point of designing it this way. It was
suggested this improves stability and usability of this feature, but
surely making it unnecessarily complex contradicts both points?

IMHO if the user needs to process the dump repeatedly, what's preventing
him/her from storing it in a file, or something like that? At that point
it's clear it's up to them to remove the file. So I suggest to keep the
feature as simple as possible - hand the dump over and delete.


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index b89278ef032..8a12bd5f65a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index 63eb2548da1..67810ea489a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2327,16 +2327,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid,
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--i7+bPtDlPvAbCgMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Bump transaction ID limit to warn at 100M.
@ 2025-11-14 16:28  Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 697+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-11-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml          | 4 ++--
 src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 6 +++---
 src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
index c8ba94303f1..c23e0a6e260 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
    <para>
     If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
     system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's
-    oldest XIDs reach forty million transactions from the wraparound point:
+    oldest XIDs reach one hundred million transactions from the wraparound point:
 
 <programlisting>
 WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 39985967 transactions
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ HINT:  Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.
 
     <para>
      Similar to the XID case, if autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the
-     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach forty
+     system will begin to emit warning messages when the database's oldest MXIDs reach one hundred
      million transactions from the wraparound point.  And, just as in the XID case, if these
      warnings are ignored, the system will refuse to generate new MXIDs once there are fewer
      than three million left until wraparound.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
index e1ac4bf4c0b..42bce35c887 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c
@@ -2072,16 +2072,16 @@ SetMultiXactIdLimit(MultiXactId oldest_datminmxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		multiStopLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M multis of data
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M multis of data
 	 * loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge get
-	 * down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
+	 * down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?  We
 	 * need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots of
 	 * scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	multiWarnLimit = multiWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (multiWarnLimit < FirstMultiXactId)
 		multiWarnLimit -= FirstMultiXactId;
 
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
index 962396bae10..5585381bc8c 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/varsup.c
@@ -411,16 +411,16 @@ SetTransactionIdLimit(TransactionId oldest_datfrozenxid, Oid oldest_datoid)
 		xidStopLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
 	/*
-	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 40M transactions of
+	 * We'll start complaining loudly when we get within 100M transactions of
 	 * data loss.  This is kind of arbitrary, but if you let your gas gauge
-	 * get down to 2% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
+	 * get down to 5% of full, would you be looking for the next gas station?
 	 * We need to be fairly liberal about this number because there are lots
 	 * of scenarios where most transactions are done by automatic clients that
 	 * won't pay attention to warnings.  (No, we're not gonna make this
 	 * configurable.  If you know enough to configure it, you know enough to
 	 * not get in this kind of trouble in the first place.)
 	 */
-	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 40000000;
+	xidWarnLimit = xidWrapLimit - 100000000;
 	if (xidWarnLimit < FirstNormalTransactionId)
 		xidWarnLimit -= FirstNormalTransactionId;
 
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--ChIdkGVrtcKYZbRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v2-0003-Perodically-emit-server-logs-when-fewer-than-500M.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 697+ messages in thread