public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v10 11/17] table_scan_bitmap_next_block counts lossy and exact pages
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:09:12 -0400
Now that the table_scan_bitmap_next_block() callback only returns false
when the bitmap is exhausted, it is simpler to move the management of
the lossy and exact page counters into it. We will eventually remove
this callback and table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() will update those
counters when a new block is read in.
---
src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c | 8 ++++++--
src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c | 9 ++-------
src/include/access/tableam.h | 21 +++++++++++++--------
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
index c76849a98e..d85fee1e50 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
@@ -2114,7 +2114,8 @@ heapam_estimate_rel_size(Relation rel, int32 *attr_widths,
static bool
heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block(TableScanDesc scan,
- bool *recheck, bool *lossy, BlockNumber *blockno)
+ bool *recheck, BlockNumber *blockno,
+ long *lossy_pages, long *exact_pages)
{
HeapScanDesc hscan = (HeapScanDesc) scan;
BlockNumber block;
@@ -2264,7 +2265,10 @@ heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block(TableScanDesc scan,
Assert(ntup <= MaxHeapTuplesPerPage);
hscan->rs_ntuples = ntup;
- *lossy = tbmres->ntuples < 0;
+ if (tbmres->ntuples < 0)
+ (*lossy_pages)++;
+ else
+ (*exact_pages)++;
/*
* Return true to indicate that a valid block was found and the bitmap is
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
index fe471a8a0c..076e1ff674 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
@@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ BitmapHeapNext(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
{
ExprContext *econtext;
TableScanDesc scan;
- bool lossy;
TIDBitmap *tbm;
TupleTableSlot *slot;
ParallelBitmapHeapState *pstate = node->pstate;
@@ -298,14 +297,10 @@ new_page:
BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator(node);
- if (!table_scan_bitmap_next_block(scan, &node->recheck, &lossy, &node->blockno))
+ if (!table_scan_bitmap_next_block(scan, &node->recheck, &node->blockno,
+ &node->lossy_pages, &node->exact_pages))
break;
- if (lossy)
- node->lossy_pages++;
- else
- node->exact_pages++;
-
/*
* If serial, we can error out if the the prefetch block doesn't stay
* ahead of the current block.
diff --git a/src/include/access/tableam.h b/src/include/access/tableam.h
index 29387166c1..edc54ecffe 100644
--- a/src/include/access/tableam.h
+++ b/src/include/access/tableam.h
@@ -797,8 +797,8 @@ typedef struct TableAmRoutine
* work to allow scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return tuples (e.g. it might
* make sense to perform tuple visibility checks at this time).
*
- * lossy indicates whether or not the block's representation in the bitmap
- * is lossy or exact.
+ * lossy_pages is incremented if the block's representation in the bitmap
+ * is lossy, otherwise, exact_pages is incremented.
*
* XXX: Currently this may only be implemented if the AM uses md.c as its
* storage manager, and uses ItemPointer->ip_blkid in a manner that maps
@@ -815,8 +815,10 @@ typedef struct TableAmRoutine
* scan_bitmap_next_tuple need to exist, or neither.
*/
bool (*scan_bitmap_next_block) (TableScanDesc scan,
- bool *recheck, bool *lossy,
- BlockNumber *blockno);
+ bool *recheck,
+ BlockNumber *blockno,
+ long *lossy_pages,
+ long *exact_pages);
/*
* Fetch the next tuple of a bitmap table scan into `slot` and return true
@@ -1994,15 +1996,17 @@ table_relation_estimate_size(Relation rel, int32 *attr_widths,
/*
* Prepare to fetch / check / return tuples as part of a bitmap table scan.
* `scan` needs to have been started via table_beginscan_bm(). Returns false if
- * there are no more blocks in the bitmap, true otherwise. lossy is set to true
- * if bitmap is lossy for the selected block and false otherwise.
+ * there are no more blocks in the bitmap, true otherwise. lossy_pages is
+ * incremented if bitmap is lossy for the selected block and exact_pages is
+ * incremented otherwise.
*
* Note, this is an optionally implemented function, therefore should only be
* used after verifying the presence (at plan time or such).
*/
static inline bool
table_scan_bitmap_next_block(TableScanDesc scan,
- bool *recheck, bool *lossy, BlockNumber *blockno)
+ bool *recheck, BlockNumber *blockno,
+ long *lossy_pages, long *exact_pages)
{
/*
* We don't expect direct calls to table_scan_bitmap_next_block with valid
@@ -2013,7 +2017,8 @@ table_scan_bitmap_next_block(TableScanDesc scan,
elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_scan_bitmap_next_block call during logical decoding");
return scan->rs_rd->rd_tableam->scan_bitmap_next_block(scan, recheck,
- lossy, blockno);
+ blockno, lossy_pages,
+ exact_pages);
}
/*
--
2.40.1
--3o7pc6dfau5a5hry
Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="v10-0012-Hard-code-TBMIterateResult-offsets-array-size.patch"
view thread (23+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 11/17] table_scan_bitmap_next_block counts lossy and exact pages
In-Reply-To: <no-message-id-1857222@localhost>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox