From: Justin Pryzby <pryzbyj@telsasoft.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:43:12 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 07/17] pg_restore: "must be specified" and --list

This was discussed here, but the idea got lost.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20190612170201.GA11881%40alvherre.pgsql#2984347ab074e6f198bd294fa41884df

Note that -d and -f are exclusive.
Perhaps we should also reject -d and -l ?
---
 src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c
index 589b4aed53..742e4140eb 100644
--- a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c
+++ b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
 	/* Complain if neither -f nor -d was specified (except if dumping TOC) */
 	if (!opts->cparams.dbname && !opts->filename && !opts->tocSummary)
 	{
-		pg_log_error("one of -d/--dbname and -f/--file must be specified");
+		pg_log_error("one of -d/--dbname, -f/--file or -l/--list must be specified");
 		exit_nicely(1);
 	}
 
-- 
2.17.0


--PVZB3C997XEKXh6G
Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="0008-pg_dump-fix-pre-existing-docs-comments.patch"