public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedEnhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data
19+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data
@ 2023-04-18 21:36 Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
2023-04-19 06:10 ` Re: Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Geoghegan @ 2023-04-18 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-hackers; +Cc: Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>; Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Recent commits that enhanced rmgr desc routines (commits 7d8219a4 and
1c453cfd) dealt with records that lack relevant block data (and so
lack anything to give a more detailed summary of) by testing
!DecodedBkpBlock.has_image -- that is the gating condition that
determines if we want to (say) output a textual array representation
of the page offset number from a given nbtree VACUUM WAL record.
Strictly speaking, this isn't the correct gating condition to test. We
should be testing the *presence* of the relevant block data instead.
Why test an inexact proxy for the condition that we care about, when
we can just as easily test the precise condition we care about
instead?
This isn't just a theoretical issue. Currently, we won't display
detailed descriptions of block data whenever wal_consistency_checking
happens to be in use. At least for those records with relevant block
data available to summarize that also happen to have an FPI that the
REDO routine isn't supposed to apply (i.e. an FPI that is included in
the record purely so that verifyBackupPageConsistency can verify that
the REDO routine produces a matching image).
Attached patch fixes this bug.
--
Peter Geoghegan
Attachments:
[application/octet-stream] v1-0001-Test-has_data-in-rmgr-desc-routines.patch (3.4K, ../../CAH2-Wzm5Sc9cBg1qWV_cEBfLNJCrW9FjS-SoHVt8FLA7Ldn8yg@mail.gmail.com/2-v1-0001-Test-has_data-in-rmgr-desc-routines.patch)
download | inline diff:
From a0e8f6e2a24ffae4864b4b5e2b53a69212ab058c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:47:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v1] Test has_data in rmgr desc routines.
---
src/include/access/xlogreader.h | 2 ++
src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/heapdesc.c | 8 ++++----
src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/nbtdesc.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/include/access/xlogreader.h b/src/include/access/xlogreader.h
index d77bb2ab9..b5d07e16c 100644
--- a/src/include/access/xlogreader.h
+++ b/src/include/access/xlogreader.h
@@ -419,6 +419,8 @@ extern bool DecodeXLogRecord(XLogReaderState *state,
#define XLogRecHasBlockRef(decoder, block_id) \
(((decoder)->record->max_block_id >= (block_id)) && \
((decoder)->record->blocks[block_id].in_use))
+#define XLogRecHasBlockData(decoder, block_id) \
+ ((decoder)->record->blocks[block_id].has_data)
#define XLogRecHasBlockImage(decoder, block_id) \
((decoder)->record->blocks[block_id].has_image)
#define XLogRecBlockImageApply(decoder, block_id) \
diff --git a/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/heapdesc.c b/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/heapdesc.c
index 1c0fbb3e8..d73248abd 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/heapdesc.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/heapdesc.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ heap2_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record)
xlrec->nredirected,
xlrec->ndead);
- if (!XLogRecHasBlockImage(record, 0))
+ if (XLogRecHasBlockData(record, 0))
{
OffsetNumber *end;
OffsetNumber *redirected;
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ heap2_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record)
appendStringInfo(buf, "nunused: %u", xlrec->nunused);
- if (!XLogRecHasBlockImage(record, 0))
+ if (XLogRecHasBlockData(record, 0))
{
OffsetNumber *nowunused;
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ heap2_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record)
appendStringInfo(buf, "snapshotConflictHorizon: %u, nplans: %u",
xlrec->snapshotConflictHorizon, xlrec->nplans);
- if (!XLogRecHasBlockImage(record, 0))
+ if (XLogRecHasBlockData(record, 0))
{
xl_heap_freeze_plan *plans;
OffsetNumber *offsets;
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ heap2_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record)
appendStringInfo(buf, "ntuples: %d, flags: 0x%02X", xlrec->ntuples,
xlrec->flags);
- if (!XLogRecHasBlockImage(record, 0) && !isinit)
+ if (XLogRecHasBlockData(record, 0) && !isinit)
{
appendStringInfoString(buf, ", offsets:");
array_desc(buf, xlrec->offsets, sizeof(OffsetNumber),
diff --git a/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/nbtdesc.c b/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/nbtdesc.c
index c50d5547d..281a015f5 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/nbtdesc.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/nbtdesc.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ btree_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record)
appendStringInfo(buf, "ndeleted: %u, nupdated: %u",
xlrec->ndeleted, xlrec->nupdated);
- if (!XLogRecHasBlockImage(record, 0))
+ if (XLogRecHasBlockData(record, 0))
delvacuum_desc(buf, XLogRecGetBlockData(record, 0, NULL),
xlrec->ndeleted, xlrec->nupdated);
break;
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ btree_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record)
xlrec->snapshotConflictHorizon,
xlrec->ndeleted, xlrec->nupdated);
- if (!XLogRecHasBlockImage(record, 0))
+ if (XLogRecHasBlockData(record, 0))
delvacuum_desc(buf, XLogRecGetBlockData(record, 0, NULL),
xlrec->ndeleted, xlrec->nupdated);
break;
--
2.40.0
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data
2023-04-18 21:36 Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
@ 2023-04-19 06:10 ` Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
2023-04-19 17:43 ` Re: Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Michael Paquier @ 2023-04-19 06:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-hackers; Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>; Andres Freund <[email protected]>
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> This isn't just a theoretical issue. Currently, we won't display
> detailed descriptions of block data whenever wal_consistency_checking
> happens to be in use. At least for those records with relevant block
> data available to summarize that also happen to have an FPI that the
> REDO routine isn't supposed to apply (i.e. an FPI that is included in
> the record purely so that verifyBackupPageConsistency can verify that
> the REDO routine produces a matching image).
Yeah, I agree that your suggestion is more useful for debugging when a
record includes both a block image and some data associated to it.
So, +1.
--
Michael
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (833B, ../../[email protected]/2-signature.asc)
download
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data
2023-04-18 21:36 Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
2023-04-19 06:10 ` Re: Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
@ 2023-04-19 17:43 ` Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Geoghegan @ 2023-04-19 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-hackers; Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>; Andres Freund <[email protected]>
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 11:10 PM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, I agree that your suggestion is more useful for debugging when a
> record includes both a block image and some data associated to it.
> So, +1.
Okay, pushed that fix just now.
--
Peter Geoghegan
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 14ad0a5006f..b176ac39799 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 01b3bbc1be8..d6cf1f27771 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1838,6 +1838,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index d7c5193d4ce..ad9ecad829f 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2667,6 +2667,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strnlen', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index fec79992c8d..78bb7df543e 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 92fcc5f3063..c19a50f108e 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of
`LLVMCreateGDBRegistrationListener', and to 0 if you don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_LLVMCREATEGDBREGISTRATIONLISTENER
base-commit: 44f49511b7940adf3be4337d4feb2de38fe92297
--
2.49.0
--n6t6hie3zne7u6vd--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index fb6a4914b06..1da073f0aaa 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d3febfe58f1..075194a8af8 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 6d304f32fb0..d346aefe9b6 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2694,6 +2694,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strlcpy', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 563f20374ff..b41a5f9dcca 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 339268dc8ef..e7b8e023829 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -80,6 +80,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `memset_s', and to 0 if you
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_MEMSET_S
base-commit: 6831cd9e3b082d7b830c3196742dd49e3540c49b
--
2.49.0
--7u2oub7w3nl66bkx--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index fb6a4914b06..1da073f0aaa 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d3febfe58f1..075194a8af8 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 6d304f32fb0..d346aefe9b6 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2694,6 +2694,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strlcpy', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 563f20374ff..b41a5f9dcca 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 339268dc8ef..e7b8e023829 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -80,6 +80,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `memset_s', and to 0 if you
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_MEMSET_S
base-commit: 6831cd9e3b082d7b830c3196742dd49e3540c49b
--
2.49.0
--7u2oub7w3nl66bkx--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 14ad0a5006f..b176ac39799 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 01b3bbc1be8..d6cf1f27771 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1838,6 +1838,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index d7c5193d4ce..ad9ecad829f 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2667,6 +2667,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strnlen', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index fec79992c8d..78bb7df543e 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 92fcc5f3063..c19a50f108e 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of
`LLVMCreateGDBRegistrationListener', and to 0 if you don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_LLVMCREATEGDBREGISTRATIONLISTENER
base-commit: 44f49511b7940adf3be4337d4feb2de38fe92297
--
2.49.0
--n6t6hie3zne7u6vd--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index fb6a4914b06..1da073f0aaa 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d3febfe58f1..075194a8af8 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 6d304f32fb0..d346aefe9b6 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2694,6 +2694,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strlcpy', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 563f20374ff..b41a5f9dcca 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 339268dc8ef..e7b8e023829 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -80,6 +80,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `memset_s', and to 0 if you
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_MEMSET_S
base-commit: 6831cd9e3b082d7b830c3196742dd49e3540c49b
--
2.49.0
--7u2oub7w3nl66bkx--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index fb6a4914b06..1da073f0aaa 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d3febfe58f1..075194a8af8 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 6d304f32fb0..d346aefe9b6 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2694,6 +2694,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strlcpy', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 563f20374ff..b41a5f9dcca 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 339268dc8ef..e7b8e023829 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -80,6 +80,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `memset_s', and to 0 if you
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_MEMSET_S
base-commit: 6831cd9e3b082d7b830c3196742dd49e3540c49b
--
2.49.0
--7u2oub7w3nl66bkx--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 14ad0a5006f..b176ac39799 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 01b3bbc1be8..d6cf1f27771 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1838,6 +1838,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index d7c5193d4ce..ad9ecad829f 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2667,6 +2667,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strnlen', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index fec79992c8d..78bb7df543e 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 92fcc5f3063..c19a50f108e 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of
`LLVMCreateGDBRegistrationListener', and to 0 if you don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_LLVMCREATEGDBREGISTRATIONLISTENER
base-commit: 44f49511b7940adf3be4337d4feb2de38fe92297
--
2.49.0
--n6t6hie3zne7u6vd--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 14ad0a5006f..b176ac39799 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 01b3bbc1be8..d6cf1f27771 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1838,6 +1838,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index d7c5193d4ce..ad9ecad829f 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2667,6 +2667,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strnlen', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index fec79992c8d..78bb7df543e 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 92fcc5f3063..c19a50f108e 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of
`LLVMCreateGDBRegistrationListener', and to 0 if you don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_LLVMCREATEGDBREGISTRATIONLISTENER
base-commit: 44f49511b7940adf3be4337d4feb2de38fe92297
--
2.49.0
--n6t6hie3zne7u6vd--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 14ad0a5006f..b176ac39799 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 01b3bbc1be8..d6cf1f27771 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1838,6 +1838,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index d7c5193d4ce..ad9ecad829f 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2667,6 +2667,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strnlen', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index fec79992c8d..78bb7df543e 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 92fcc5f3063..c19a50f108e 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of
`LLVMCreateGDBRegistrationListener', and to 0 if you don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_LLVMCREATEGDBREGISTRATIONLISTENER
base-commit: 44f49511b7940adf3be4337d4feb2de38fe92297
--
2.49.0
--n6t6hie3zne7u6vd--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index fb6a4914b06..1da073f0aaa 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d3febfe58f1..075194a8af8 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 6d304f32fb0..d346aefe9b6 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2694,6 +2694,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strlcpy', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 563f20374ff..b41a5f9dcca 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 339268dc8ef..e7b8e023829 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -80,6 +80,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `memset_s', and to 0 if you
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_MEMSET_S
base-commit: 6831cd9e3b082d7b830c3196742dd49e3540c49b
--
2.49.0
--7u2oub7w3nl66bkx--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 14ad0a5006f..b176ac39799 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 01b3bbc1be8..d6cf1f27771 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1838,6 +1838,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index d7c5193d4ce..ad9ecad829f 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2667,6 +2667,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strnlen', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index fec79992c8d..78bb7df543e 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 92fcc5f3063..c19a50f108e 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of
`LLVMCreateGDBRegistrationListener', and to 0 if you don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_LLVMCREATEGDBREGISTRATIONLISTENER
base-commit: 44f49511b7940adf3be4337d4feb2de38fe92297
--
2.49.0
--n6t6hie3zne7u6vd--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index fb6a4914b06..1da073f0aaa 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d3febfe58f1..075194a8af8 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 6d304f32fb0..d346aefe9b6 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2694,6 +2694,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strlcpy', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 563f20374ff..b41a5f9dcca 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 339268dc8ef..e7b8e023829 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -80,6 +80,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `memset_s', and to 0 if you
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_MEMSET_S
base-commit: 6831cd9e3b082d7b830c3196742dd49e3540c49b
--
2.49.0
--7u2oub7w3nl66bkx--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 14ad0a5006f..b176ac39799 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 01b3bbc1be8..d6cf1f27771 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1838,6 +1838,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index d7c5193d4ce..ad9ecad829f 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2667,6 +2667,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strnlen', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index fec79992c8d..78bb7df543e 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 92fcc5f3063..c19a50f108e 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of
`LLVMCreateGDBRegistrationListener', and to 0 if you don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_LLVMCREATEGDBREGISTRATIONLISTENER
base-commit: 44f49511b7940adf3be4337d4feb2de38fe92297
--
2.49.0
--n6t6hie3zne7u6vd--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index fb6a4914b06..1da073f0aaa 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d3febfe58f1..075194a8af8 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 6d304f32fb0..d346aefe9b6 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2694,6 +2694,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strlcpy', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 563f20374ff..b41a5f9dcca 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 339268dc8ef..e7b8e023829 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -80,6 +80,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `memset_s', and to 0 if you
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_MEMSET_S
base-commit: 6831cd9e3b082d7b830c3196742dd49e3540c49b
--
2.49.0
--7u2oub7w3nl66bkx--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index fb6a4914b06..1da073f0aaa 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d3febfe58f1..075194a8af8 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 6d304f32fb0..d346aefe9b6 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2694,6 +2694,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strlcpy', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 563f20374ff..b41a5f9dcca 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#if HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 339268dc8ef..e7b8e023829 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -80,6 +80,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `memset_s', and to 0 if you
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_MEMSET_S
base-commit: 6831cd9e3b082d7b830c3196742dd49e3540c49b
--
2.49.0
--7u2oub7w3nl66bkx--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile
@ 2025-12-18 17:21 Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Dmitrii Dolgov @ 2025-12-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
When starting up, postmaster checks for an existing data directory lockfile. If
this file contains current process PID, it's assumed to be stale. Turns out
there is another possibility: we might be running in a PID namespace, and there
is another postgres running inside another PID namespace using the same data
directory. The result is that we don't see another process due to namespace
isolation and start concurrently with the other.
To prevent such situations, at startup use fcntl to get an exclusive open file
description lock for data directory lockfile. Since such locks are associated
with open file descriptors, meaning they're not affected by PID namespace
isolation. It's a "best effort" locking, intended to work with already existing
mechanism, not replace it.
This approach was discussed multiple times in the past, and usually was
rejected as the main work horse for the data directory lockfile due to:
* Portability issues. Open file description lock was a non-POSIX extension in
Linux and similar flock is from BSD standard. But looks like everybody agrees
that such locks make more sense than a typical advisory locks, and
F_OFD_SETLK made its way into POSIX.1 2024 [1].
* Issues with NFS. The current state of things here looks like this:
- NFSv3 doesn't implement open file description locks, they're converted to
advisory locks instead. Advisory locks are subject to namespace isolation,
meaning that processes in different PID namespaces will not see each other
advisory lock, and it's still possible to run multiple postgres
instances on the same data directory.
- NFSv4 uses a lease system for locking, I haven't found any mention of
conversion to advisory locks neither in the man page nor in RFC [2].
To summarize, the approach is now considered POSIX and should fix the described
problem everywhere, except NFSv3.
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/fcntl.html
[2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7530
---
configure | 14 ++++
configure.ac | 3 +
meson.build | 1 +
src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
src/include/pg_config.h.in | 4 ++
5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 14ad0a5006f..b176ac39799 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -16177,6 +16177,20 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
_ACEOF
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+ac_fn_c_check_decl "$LINENO" "F_OFD_SETLK" "ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" "#include <fcntl.h>
+"
+if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_F_OFD_SETLK" = xyes; then :
+ ac_have_decl=1
+else
+ ac_have_decl=0
+fi
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK $ac_have_decl
+_ACEOF
+
+
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "explicit_bzero" "ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero"
if test "x$ac_cv_func_explicit_bzero" = xyes; then :
$as_echo "#define HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO 1" >>confdefs.h
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 01b3bbc1be8..d6cf1f27771 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1838,6 +1838,9 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([memset_s], [], [], [#define __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ 1
# This is probably only present on macOS, but may as well check always
AC_CHECK_DECLS(F_FULLFSYNC, [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+# Linux open file descriptor locks
+AC_CHECK_DECLS([F_OFD_SETLK], [], [], [#include <fcntl.h>])
+
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(m4_normalize([
explicit_bzero
getopt
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index d7c5193d4ce..ad9ecad829f 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2667,6 +2667,7 @@ decl_checks = [
['strnlen', 'string.h'],
['strsep', 'string.h'],
['timingsafe_bcmp', 'string.h'],
+ ['F_OFD_SETLK', 'fcntl.h'],
]
# Need to check for function declarations for these functions, because
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index fec79992c8d..78bb7df543e 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static List *lock_files = NIL;
static Latch LocalLatchData;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+/* File descriptor for data directory lock file. */
+static int DataDirLockFD;
+#endif
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ignoring system indexes support stuff
*
@@ -1117,6 +1122,45 @@ RestoreClientConnectionInfo(char *conninfo)
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Flock the data directory lockfile.
+ *
+ * Lock the data directory lockfile with an open file description lock. If the
+ * lock is already taken, it's a hard stop. It's only a best effort test, and
+ * any other errors are ignored. On succes the file descriptor is duplicated,
+ * to make sure there will be at least one open copy of it to keep the lock.
+ *
+ * filename is used only for reporting purposes.
+ */
+static void
+FlockDataDirLockFile(int fd, const char *filename)
+{
+
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ struct flock lock;
+
+ lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+ lock.l_start = 0;
+ lock.l_len = 0;
+ lock.l_pid = 0;
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, &lock) == -1)
+ {
+ if (errno == EAGAIN)
+ ereport(FATAL,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_LOCK_FILE_EXISTS),
+ errmsg("cannot lock the lock file \"%s\"", filename),
+ errhint("Another server is starting.")));
+ else
+ elog(WARNING, "Failed locking file \"%s\", %m", filename);
+ }
+ else
+ DataDirLockFD = dup(fd);
+#endif
+
+}
+
/*
* proc_exit callback to remove lockfiles.
*/
@@ -1125,6 +1169,11 @@ UnlinkLockFiles(int status, Datum arg)
{
ListCell *l;
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+ /* Close the file descriptor, which keeps the open file description lock */
+ close(DataDirLockFD);
+#endif
+
foreach(l, lock_files)
{
char *curfile = (char *) lfirst(l);
@@ -1171,22 +1220,32 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
const char *envvar;
/*
- * If the PID in the lockfile is our own PID or our parent's or
- * grandparent's PID, then the file must be stale (probably left over from
- * a previous system boot cycle). We need to check this because of the
- * likelihood that a reboot will assign exactly the same PID as we had in
- * the previous reboot, or one that's only one or two counts larger and
- * hence the lockfile's PID now refers to an ancestor shell process. We
- * allow pg_ctl to pass down its parent shell PID (our grandparent PID)
- * via the environment variable PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that
- * launching the postmaster via pg_ctl can be just as reliable as
- * launching it directly. There is no provision for detecting
- * further-removed ancestor processes, but if the init script is written
- * carefully then all but the immediate parent shell will be root-owned
- * processes and so the kill test will fail with EPERM. Note that we
- * cannot get a false negative this way, because an existing postmaster
- * would surely never launch a competing postmaster or pg_ctl process
- * directly.
+ * If we find an already existing lockfile containing our own PID,
+ * there are few options:
+ *
+ * - There is another process, that we don't see due to PID namespace
+ * isolation, which is already running in this data directory.
+ *
+ * To prevent two concurrent processes working with the same data
+ * directory, we first try to lock the lockfile exclusively.
+ *
+ * - The file must be stale, probably left over from a previous system boot
+ * cycle. The same if the lockfile contains our parent's or grandparent's
+ * PID.
+ *
+ * We need to check this because of the likelihood that a reboot will
+ * assign exactly the same PID as we had in the previous reboot, or one
+ * that's only one or two counts larger and hence the lockfile's PID now
+ * refers to an ancestor shell process. We allow pg_ctl to pass down its
+ * parent shell PID (our grandparent PID) via the environment variable
+ * PG_GRANDPARENT_PID; this is so that launching the postmaster via
+ * pg_ctl can be just as reliable as launching it directly. There is no
+ * provision for detecting further-removed ancestor processes, but if the
+ * init script is written carefully then all but the immediate parent
+ * shell will be root-owned processes and so the kill test will fail with
+ * EPERM. Note that we cannot get a false negative this way, because an
+ * existing postmaster would surely never launch a competing postmaster
+ * or pg_ctl process directly.
*/
my_pid = getpid();
@@ -1222,7 +1281,11 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
*/
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd >= 0)
- break; /* Success; exit the retry loop */
+ {
+ /* Success; lock and exit the retry loop */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+ break;
+ }
/*
* Couldn't create the pid file. Probably it already exists.
@@ -1236,8 +1299,12 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
/*
* Read the file to get the old owner's PID. Note race condition
* here: file might have been deleted since we tried to create it.
+ *
+ * We're going to use the same fd for flock, and want to create a write
+ * lock for the latter one. Since both fd and the lock have to be of
+ * the same type, open the file for read and write.
*/
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY, pg_file_create_mode);
+ fd = open(filename, O_RDWR, pg_file_create_mode);
if (fd < 0)
{
if (errno == ENOENT)
@@ -1247,6 +1314,10 @@ CreateLockFile(const char *filename, bool amPostmaster,
errmsg("could not open lock file \"%s\": %m",
filename)));
}
+
+ /* Try to lock the file. We stop here, if it's already locked. */
+ FlockDataDirLockFile(fd, filename);
+
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_LOCK_FILE_CREATE_READ);
if ((len = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1)) < 0)
ereport(FATAL,
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index 92fcc5f3063..c19a50f108e 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_F_FULLFSYNC
+/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `F_OFD_SETLK', and to 0 if you
+ don't. */
+#undef HAVE_DECL_F_OFD_SETLK
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of
`LLVMCreateGDBRegistrationListener', and to 0 if you don't. */
#undef HAVE_DECL_LLVMCREATEGDBREGISTRATIONLISTENER
base-commit: 44f49511b7940adf3be4337d4feb2de38fe92297
--
2.49.0
--n6t6hie3zne7u6vd--
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 19+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-18 17:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-18 21:36 Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
2023-04-19 06:10 ` Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
2023-04-19 17:43 ` Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v2] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
2025-12-18 17:21 [PATCH v1] Use open file description locks for data directory lockfile Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox