agora inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid 265+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid @ 2022-01-10 19:20 Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Pavel Borisov @ 2022-01-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Authors: - Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> - Maxim Orlov <[email protected]> - Yura Sokolov <[email protected]> <[email protected]> --- src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..457ba9b9ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +src/backend/access/heap/README.XID64 + +64-bit Transaction ID's (XID) +============================= + +A limited number (N = 2^32) of XID's required to do vacuum freeze to prevent +wraparound every N/2 transactions. This causes performance degradation due +to the need to exclusively lock tables while being vacuumed. In each +wraparound cycle, SLRU buffers are also being cut. + +With 64-bit XID's wraparound is effectively postponed to a very distant +future. Even in highly loaded systems that had 2^32 transactions per day +it will take huge 2^31 days before the first enforced "vacuum to prevent +wraparound"). Buffers cutting and routine vacuum are not enforced, and DBA +can plan them independently at the time with the least system load and least +critical for database performance. Also, it can be done less frequently +(several times a year vs every several days) on systems with transaction rates +similar to those mentioned above. + +On-disk tuple and page format +----------------------------- + +On-disk tuple format remains unchanged. 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax store the +lower parts of 64-bit XMIN and XMAX values. Each heap page has additional +64-bit pd_xid_base and pd_multi_base which are common for all tuples on a page. +They are placed into a pd_special area - 16 bytes in the end of a heap page. +Actual XMIN/XMAX for a tuple are calculated upon reading a tuple from a page +as follows: + +XMIN = t_xmin + pd_xid_base. (1) +XMAX = t_xmax + pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. (2) + +"Double XMAX" page format +--------------------------------- + +At first read of a heap page after pg_upgrade from 32-bit XID PostgreSQL +version pd_special area with a size of 16 bytes should be added to a page. +Though a page may not have space for this. Then it can be converted to a +temporary format called "double XMAX". + +All tuples after pg-upgrade would necessarily have xmin = FrozenTransactionId. +So we don't need tuple header t_xmin field and we reuse t_xmin to store higher +32 bits of its XMAX. + +Double XMAX format is only for full pages that don't have 16 bytes for +pd_special. So it neither has a�place for a single tuple. Insert and HOT update +for double XMAX pages is impossible and not supported. We can only read or +delete tuples from it. + +When we are able to prune page double XMAX it will be converted from it to +general 64-bit XID page format with all operations on its tuples supported. + +In-memory tuple format +---------------------- + +In-memory tuple representation consists of two parts: +- HeapTupleHeader from disk page (contains all heap tuple contents, not only +header) +- HeapTuple with additional in-memory fields + +HeapTuple for each tuple in memory stores t_xid_base/t_multi_base - a copies of +page's pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. With tuple's 32-bit t_xmin and t_xmax from +HeapTupleHeader they are used to calculate actual 64-bit XMIN and XMAX: + +XMIN = t_xmin + t_xid_base. (3) +XMAX = t_xmax + t_xid_base/t_multi_base. (4) + +The downside of this is that we can not use tuple's XMIN and XMAX right away. +We often need to re-read t_xmin and t_xmax - which could actually be pointers +into a page in shared buffers and therefore they could be updated by any other +backend. + +Update/delete with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +When we try to delete/update a tuple, we check that XMAX for a page fits (2). +I.e. that t_xmax will not be over MaxShortTransactionId relative to +pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base of a its page. + +If the current XID doesn't fit a range +(pd_xid_base, pd_xid_base + MaxShortTransactionId) (5): + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base on +a page and update all t_xmin/t_xmax of the other tuples on the page to +correspond new pd_xid_base/pd_multi_base. + +- If it was impossible, it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +- If this is unsuccessful it will throw an error. Normally this is very +unlikely but if there is a very old living transaction with an age of around +2^32 this can arise. Basically, this is a behavior similar to one during the +vacuum to prevent wraparound when XID was 32-bit. Dba should take care and +avoid very-long-living transactions with an age close to 2^32. So long-living +transactions often they are most likely defunct. + +Insert with 64-bit XIDs and 32-bit t_xmin/t_xmax +------------------------------------------------ + +On insert we check if current XID fits a range (5). Otherwise: + +- heap_page_prepare_for_xid() will try to increase pd_xid_base for t_xmin will +not be over MaxShortTransactionId. + +- If it is impossible, then it will try to prune and freeze tuples on a page. + +Known issue: if pd_xid_base could not be shifted to accommodate a tuple being +inserted due to a very long-running transaction, we just throw an error. We +neither try to insert a�tuple into another page nor mark the current page as +full. So, in this (unlikely) case we will get regular insert errors on the next +tries to insert to the page 'locked' by this very long-running transaction. + +Upgrade from 32-bit XID versions +-------------------------------- + +pg_upgrade doesn't change pages format itself. It is done lazily after. + +1. At first heap page read, tuples on a page are repacked to free 16 bytes +at the end of a page, possibly freeing space from dead tuples. + +2A. 16 bytes of pd_special is added if there is a place for it + +2B. Page is converted to "Double XMAX" format if there is no place for +pd_special + +3. If a page is in double XMAX format after its first read, and vacuum (or +micro-vacuum at select query) could prune some tuples and free space for +pd_special, prune_page will add pd_special and convert page from double XMAX +to general 64-bit XID page format. -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) --cpok4wp6gsarlzvp-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Shorten pg_attribute_always_inline to pg_always_inline @ 2026-04-08 21:07 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 265+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-08 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/include/c.h | 8 +++--- src/include/executor/execScan.h | 8 +++--- src/include/portability/instr_time.h | 8 +++--- src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c | 2 +- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +-- src/backend/commands/copyfromparse.c | 32 ++++++++++++------------ src/backend/commands/copyto.c | 4 +-- src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c | 36 +++++++++++++-------------- src/backend/executor/execTuples.c | 6 ++--- src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c | 2 +- src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c | 4 +-- src/backend/nodes/queryjumblefuncs.c | 6 ++--- src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c | 24 +++++++++--------- src/backend/utils/adt/json.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c | 2 +- 15 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/include/c.h b/src/include/c.h index 88d13ec9993..ec74d78d72a 100644 --- a/src/include/c.h +++ b/src/include/c.h @@ -289,20 +289,20 @@ extern "C++" #endif /* - * Use "pg_attribute_always_inline" in place of "inline" for functions that + * Use "pg_always_inline" in place of "inline" for functions that * we wish to force inlining of, even when the compiler's heuristics would * choose not to. But, if possible, don't force inlining in unoptimized * debug builds. */ #if defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__OPTIMIZE__) /* GCC supports always_inline via __attribute__ */ -#define pg_attribute_always_inline __attribute__((always_inline)) inline +#define pg_always_inline __attribute__((always_inline)) inline #elif defined(_MSC_VER) /* MSVC has a special keyword for this */ -#define pg_attribute_always_inline __forceinline +#define pg_always_inline __forceinline #else /* Otherwise, the best we can do is to say "inline" */ -#define pg_attribute_always_inline inline +#define pg_always_inline inline #endif /* diff --git a/src/include/executor/execScan.h b/src/include/executor/execScan.h index 18b03235c3c..7f795b0b3fc 100644 --- a/src/include/executor/execScan.h +++ b/src/include/executor/execScan.h @@ -24,12 +24,12 @@ * This routine substitutes a test tuple if inside an EvalPlanQual recheck. * Otherwise, it simply executes the access method's next-tuple routine. * - * The pg_attribute_always_inline attribute allows the compiler to inline + * The pg_always_inline attribute allows the compiler to inline * this function into its caller. When EPQState is NULL, the EvalPlanQual * logic is completely eliminated at compile time, avoiding unnecessary * run-time checks and code for cases where EPQ is not required. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline TupleTableSlot * +static pg_always_inline TupleTableSlot * ExecScanFetch(ScanState *node, EPQState *epqstate, ExecScanAccessMtd accessMtd, @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ ExecScanFetch(ScanState *node, * conditions enforced by the access method. * * This function is an alternative to ExecScan, used when callers may omit - * 'qual' or 'projInfo'. The pg_attribute_always_inline attribute allows the + * 'qual' or 'projInfo'. The pg_always_inline attribute allows the * compiler to eliminate non-relevant branches at compile time, avoiding * run-time checks in those cases. * @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ ExecScanFetch(ScanState *node, * positioned before the first qualifying tuple. * ---------------------------------------------------------------- */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline TupleTableSlot * +static pg_always_inline TupleTableSlot * ExecScanExtended(ScanState *node, ExecScanAccessMtd accessMtd, /* function returning a tuple */ ExecScanRecheckMtd recheckMtd, diff --git a/src/include/portability/instr_time.h b/src/include/portability/instr_time.h index 92558e234ac..b110008b747 100644 --- a/src/include/portability/instr_time.h +++ b/src/include/portability/instr_time.h @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ pg_rdtscp(void) * only inlining the function partially. * See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124795 */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline instr_time +static pg_always_inline instr_time pg_get_ticks(void) { if (likely(timing_tsc_enabled)) @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ pg_get_ticks(void) return pg_get_ticks_system(); } -static pg_attribute_always_inline instr_time +static pg_always_inline instr_time pg_get_ticks_fast(void) { if (likely(timing_tsc_enabled)) @@ -398,13 +398,13 @@ pg_get_ticks_fast(void) #else -static pg_attribute_always_inline instr_time +static pg_always_inline instr_time pg_get_ticks(void) { return pg_get_ticks_system(); } -static pg_attribute_always_inline instr_time +static pg_always_inline instr_time pg_get_ticks_fast(void) { return pg_get_ticks_system(); diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c index abfd8e8970a..4f373b86028 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ heap_setscanlimits(TableScanDesc sscan, BlockNumber startBlk, BlockNumber numBlk * multiple times, with constant arguments for all_visible, * check_serializable. */ -pg_attribute_always_inline +pg_always_inline static int page_collect_tuples(HeapScanDesc scan, Snapshot snapshot, Page page, Buffer buffer, diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index f85b5286086..d13c0353dce 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -1143,9 +1143,9 @@ XLogInsertRecord(XLogRecData *rdata, * * NB: Testing shows that XLogInsertRecord runs faster if this code is inlined; * however, because there are two call sites, the compiler is reluctant to - * inline. We use pg_attribute_always_inline here to try to convince it. + * inline. We use pg_always_inline here to try to convince it. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void ReserveXLogInsertLocation(int size, XLogRecPtr *StartPos, XLogRecPtr *EndPos, XLogRecPtr *PrevPtr) { diff --git a/src/backend/commands/copyfromparse.c b/src/backend/commands/copyfromparse.c index 65fd5a0ab4f..500810577ad 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/copyfromparse.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/copyfromparse.c @@ -144,22 +144,22 @@ static const char BinarySignature[11] = "PGCOPY\n\377\r\n\0"; /* non-export function prototypes */ static bool CopyReadLine(CopyFromState cstate, bool is_csv); -static pg_attribute_always_inline bool CopyReadLineText(CopyFromState cstate, - bool is_csv); +static pg_always_inline bool CopyReadLineText(CopyFromState cstate, + bool is_csv); static int CopyReadAttributesText(CopyFromState cstate); static int CopyReadAttributesCSV(CopyFromState cstate); static Datum CopyReadBinaryAttribute(CopyFromState cstate, FmgrInfo *flinfo, Oid typioparam, int32 typmod, bool *isnull); -static pg_attribute_always_inline bool CopyFromTextLikeOneRow(CopyFromState cstate, - ExprContext *econtext, - Datum *values, - bool *nulls, - bool is_csv); -static pg_attribute_always_inline bool NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal(CopyFromState cstate, - char ***fields, - int *nfields, - bool is_csv); +static pg_always_inline bool CopyFromTextLikeOneRow(CopyFromState cstate, + ExprContext *econtext, + Datum *values, + bool *nulls, + bool is_csv); +static pg_always_inline bool NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal(CopyFromState cstate, + char ***fields, + int *nfields, + bool is_csv); /* Low-level communications functions */ @@ -769,11 +769,11 @@ NextCopyFromRawFields(CopyFromState cstate, char ***fields, int *nfields) * * NOTE: force_not_null option are not applied to the returned fields. * - * We use pg_attribute_always_inline to reduce function call overhead + * We use pg_always_inline to reduce function call overhead * and to help compilers to optimize away the 'is_csv' condition when called * by internal functions such as CopyFromTextLikeOneRow(). */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline bool +static pg_always_inline bool NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal(CopyFromState cstate, char ***fields, int *nfields, bool is_csv) { int fldct; @@ -946,10 +946,10 @@ CopyFromCSVOneRow(CopyFromState cstate, ExprContext *econtext, Datum *values, /* * Workhorse for CopyFromTextOneRow() and CopyFromCSVOneRow(). * - * We use pg_attribute_always_inline to reduce function call overhead + * We use pg_always_inline to reduce function call overhead * and to help compilers to optimize away the 'is_csv' condition. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline bool +static pg_always_inline bool CopyFromTextLikeOneRow(CopyFromState cstate, ExprContext *econtext, Datum *values, bool *nulls, bool is_csv) { @@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ CopyReadLineTextSIMDHelper(CopyFromState cstate, bool is_csv, /* * CopyReadLineText - inner loop of CopyReadLine for text mode */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline bool +static pg_always_inline bool CopyReadLineText(CopyFromState cstate, bool is_csv) { char *copy_input_buf; diff --git a/src/backend/commands/copyto.c b/src/backend/commands/copyto.c index f0e0147c665..2d91ca86b3d 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/copyto.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/copyto.c @@ -294,10 +294,10 @@ CopyToCSVOneRow(CopyToState cstate, TupleTableSlot *slot) /* * Workhorse for CopyToTextOneRow() and CopyToCSVOneRow(). * - * We use pg_attribute_always_inline to reduce function call overhead + * We use pg_always_inline to reduce function call overhead * and to help compilers to optimize away the 'is_csv' condition. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void CopyToTextLikeOneRow(CopyToState cstate, TupleTableSlot *slot, bool is_csv) diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c b/src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c index 3c4843cde86..2bb0a3d1f63 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c @@ -178,16 +178,16 @@ static Datum ExecJustHashInnerVarVirt(ExprState *state, ExprContext *econtext, b static Datum ExecJustHashOuterVarStrict(ExprState *state, ExprContext *econtext, bool *isnull); /* execution helper functions */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void ExecAggPlainTransByVal(AggState *aggstate, - AggStatePerTrans pertrans, - AggStatePerGroup pergroup, - ExprContext *aggcontext, - int setno); -static pg_attribute_always_inline void ExecAggPlainTransByRef(AggState *aggstate, - AggStatePerTrans pertrans, - AggStatePerGroup pergroup, - ExprContext *aggcontext, - int setno); +static pg_always_inline void ExecAggPlainTransByVal(AggState *aggstate, + AggStatePerTrans pertrans, + AggStatePerGroup pergroup, + ExprContext *aggcontext, + int setno); +static pg_always_inline void ExecAggPlainTransByRef(AggState *aggstate, + AggStatePerTrans pertrans, + AggStatePerGroup pergroup, + ExprContext *aggcontext, + int setno); static char *ExecGetJsonValueItemString(JsonbValue *item, bool *resnull); /* @@ -2544,7 +2544,7 @@ get_cached_rowtype(Oid type_id, int32 typmod, */ /* implementation of ExecJust(Inner|Outer|Scan)Var */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline Datum +static pg_always_inline Datum ExecJustVarImpl(ExprState *state, TupleTableSlot *slot, bool *isnull) { ExprEvalStep *op = &state->steps[1]; @@ -2582,7 +2582,7 @@ ExecJustScanVar(ExprState *state, ExprContext *econtext, bool *isnull) } /* implementation of ExecJustAssign(Inner|Outer|Scan)Var */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline Datum +static pg_always_inline Datum ExecJustAssignVarImpl(ExprState *state, TupleTableSlot *inslot, bool *isnull) { ExprEvalStep *op = &state->steps[1]; @@ -2677,7 +2677,7 @@ ExecJustConst(ExprState *state, ExprContext *econtext, bool *isnull) } /* implementation of ExecJust(Inner|Outer|Scan)VarVirt */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline Datum +static pg_always_inline Datum ExecJustVarVirtImpl(ExprState *state, TupleTableSlot *slot, bool *isnull) { ExprEvalStep *op = &state->steps[0]; @@ -2720,7 +2720,7 @@ ExecJustScanVarVirt(ExprState *state, ExprContext *econtext, bool *isnull) } /* implementation of ExecJustAssign(Inner|Outer|Scan)VarVirt */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline Datum +static pg_always_inline Datum ExecJustAssignVarVirtImpl(ExprState *state, TupleTableSlot *inslot, bool *isnull) { ExprEvalStep *op = &state->steps[0]; @@ -2799,7 +2799,7 @@ ExecJustHashInnerVarWithIV(ExprState *state, ExprContext *econtext, } /* implementation of ExecJustHash(Inner|Outer)Var */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline Datum +static pg_always_inline Datum ExecJustHashVarImpl(ExprState *state, TupleTableSlot *slot, bool *isnull) { ExprEvalStep *fetchop = &state->steps[0]; @@ -2837,7 +2837,7 @@ ExecJustHashInnerVar(ExprState *state, ExprContext *econtext, bool *isnull) } /* implementation of ExecJustHash(Inner|Outer)VarVirt */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline Datum +static pg_always_inline Datum ExecJustHashVarVirtImpl(ExprState *state, TupleTableSlot *slot, bool *isnull) { ExprEvalStep *var = &state->steps[0]; @@ -5836,7 +5836,7 @@ ExecEvalAggOrderedTransTuple(ExprState *state, ExprEvalStep *op, } /* implementation of transition function invocation for byval types */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void ExecAggPlainTransByVal(AggState *aggstate, AggStatePerTrans pertrans, AggStatePerGroup pergroup, ExprContext *aggcontext, int setno) @@ -5868,7 +5868,7 @@ ExecAggPlainTransByVal(AggState *aggstate, AggStatePerTrans pertrans, } /* implementation of transition function invocation for byref types */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void ExecAggPlainTransByRef(AggState *aggstate, AggStatePerTrans pertrans, AggStatePerGroup pergroup, ExprContext *aggcontext, int setno) diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execTuples.c b/src/backend/executor/execTuples.c index f08982a43cc..cb47b4fda1b 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/execTuples.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/execTuples.c @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ static TupleDesc ExecTypeFromTLInternal(List *targetList, bool skipjunk); -static pg_attribute_always_inline void slot_deform_heap_tuple(TupleTableSlot *slot, HeapTuple tuple, uint32 *offp, - int reqnatts, bool support_cstring); +static pg_always_inline void slot_deform_heap_tuple(TupleTableSlot *slot, HeapTuple tuple, uint32 *offp, + int reqnatts, bool support_cstring); static inline void tts_buffer_heap_store_tuple(TupleTableSlot *slot, HeapTuple tuple, Buffer buffer, @@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ tts_buffer_heap_store_tuple(TupleTableSlot *slot, HeapTuple tuple, * emit code during inlining for cstring deforming when it's required. * cstrings can exist in MinimalTuples, but not in HeapTuples. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void slot_deform_heap_tuple(TupleTableSlot *slot, HeapTuple tuple, uint32 *offp, int reqnatts, bool support_cstring) { diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c index 0b365d5b475..202dd866251 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static void ExecParallelHashJoinPartitionOuter(HashJoinState *hjstate); * the other one is "outer". * ---------------------------------------------------------------- */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline TupleTableSlot * +static pg_always_inline TupleTableSlot * ExecHashJoinImpl(PlanState *pstate, bool parallel) { HashJoinState *node = castNode(HashJoinState, pstate); diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c index 5bcb0a861d7..b8c528ca089 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static TupleTableSlot *SeqNext(SeqScanState *node); * This is a workhorse for ExecSeqScan * ---------------------------------------------------------------- */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline TupleTableSlot * +static pg_always_inline TupleTableSlot * SeqNext(SeqScanState *node) { TableScanDesc scandesc; @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ SeqNext(SeqScanState *node) /* * SeqRecheck -- access method routine to recheck a tuple in EvalPlanQual */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline bool +static pg_always_inline bool SeqRecheck(SeqScanState *node, TupleTableSlot *slot) { /* diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/queryjumblefuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/queryjumblefuncs.c index 7c63766a51c..2ce27b9e552 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/queryjumblefuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/queryjumblefuncs.c @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ DoJumble(JumbleState *jstate, Node *node) * * Note: Callers must ensure that size > 0. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void AppendJumbleInternal(JumbleState *jstate, const unsigned char *item, Size size) { @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ AppendJumble(JumbleState *jstate, const unsigned char *value, Size size) * AppendJumbleNull * For jumbling NULL pointers */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void AppendJumbleNull(JumbleState *jstate) { jstate->pending_nulls++; @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ AppendJumble64(JumbleState *jstate, const unsigned char *value) * * Note: Callers must ensure that there's at least 1 pending NULL. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void FlushPendingNulls(JumbleState *jstate) { Assert(jstate->pending_nulls > 0); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c b/src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c index 3cc0b0bdd92..1f1198ec0f7 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c @@ -649,10 +649,10 @@ static inline BufferDesc *BufferAlloc(SMgrRelation smgr, static bool AsyncReadBuffers(ReadBuffersOperation *operation, int *nblocks_progress); static void CheckReadBuffersOperation(ReadBuffersOperation *operation, bool is_complete); -static pg_attribute_always_inline void TrackBufferHit(IOObject io_object, - IOContext io_context, - Relation rel, char persistence, SMgrRelation smgr, - ForkNumber forknum, BlockNumber blocknum); +static pg_always_inline void TrackBufferHit(IOObject io_object, + IOContext io_context, + Relation rel, char persistence, SMgrRelation smgr, + ForkNumber forknum, BlockNumber blocknum); static Buffer GetVictimBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy strategy, IOContext io_context); static void FlushUnlockedBuffer(BufferDesc *buf, SMgrRelation reln, IOObject io_object, IOContext io_context); @@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ ZeroAndLockBuffer(Buffer buffer, ReadBufferMode mode, bool already_valid) * already present, or false if more work is required to either read it in or * zero it. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline Buffer +static pg_always_inline Buffer PinBufferForBlock(Relation rel, SMgrRelation smgr, char persistence, @@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ PinBufferForBlock(Relation rel, * * smgr is required, rel is optional unless using P_NEW. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline Buffer +static pg_always_inline Buffer ReadBuffer_common(Relation rel, SMgrRelation smgr, char smgr_persistence, ForkNumber forkNum, BlockNumber blockNum, ReadBufferMode mode, @@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ ReadBuffer_common(Relation rel, SMgrRelation smgr, char smgr_persistence, return buffer; } -static pg_attribute_always_inline bool +static pg_always_inline bool StartReadBuffersImpl(ReadBuffersOperation *operation, Buffer *buffers, BlockNumber blockNum, @@ -1670,7 +1670,7 @@ CheckReadBuffersOperation(ReadBuffersOperation *operation, bool is_complete) * We track various stats related to buffer hits. Because this is done in a * few separate places, this helper exists for convenience. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void TrackBufferHit(IOObject io_object, IOContext io_context, Relation rel, char persistence, SMgrRelation smgr, ForkNumber forknum, BlockNumber blocknum) @@ -2184,7 +2184,7 @@ AsyncReadBuffers(ReadBuffersOperation *operation, int *nblocks_progress) * * No locks are held either at entry or exit. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline BufferDesc * +static pg_always_inline BufferDesc * BufferAlloc(SMgrRelation smgr, char relpersistence, ForkNumber forkNum, BlockNumber blockNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy, @@ -8277,7 +8277,7 @@ MarkDirtyAllUnpinnedBuffers(int32 *buffers_dirtied, * part of error handling, which in turn could lead to the buffer being * replaced while IO is ongoing. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void buffer_stage_common(PgAioHandle *ioh, bool is_write, bool is_temp) { uint64 *io_data; @@ -8521,7 +8521,7 @@ buffer_readv_encode_error(PgAioResult *result, * Helper for AIO readv completion callbacks, supporting both shared and temp * buffers. Gets called once for each buffer in a multi-page read. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void buffer_readv_complete_one(PgAioTargetData *td, uint8 buf_off, Buffer buffer, uint8 flags, bool failed, bool is_temp, bool *buffer_invalid, @@ -8672,7 +8672,7 @@ buffer_readv_complete_one(PgAioTargetData *td, uint8 buf_off, Buffer buffer, * * Shared between shared and local buffers, to reduce code duplication. */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline PgAioResult +static pg_always_inline PgAioResult buffer_readv_complete(PgAioHandle *ioh, PgAioResult prior_result, uint8 cb_data, bool is_temp) { diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/json.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/json.c index 0fee1b40d63..dccbe07cd2d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/json.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/json.c @@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@ json_object_two_arg(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) * escape_json_char * Inline helper function for escape_json* functions */ -static pg_attribute_always_inline void +static pg_always_inline void escape_json_char(StringInfo buf, char c) { switch (c) diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c index 87ed5506460..baa98f18ffa 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c @@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ RehashCatCacheLists(CatCache *cp) * * Call CatalogCacheInitializeCache() if not yet done. */ -pg_attribute_always_inline +pg_always_inline static void ConditionalCatalogCacheInitializeCache(CatCache *cache) { -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --nrl6kihukes5f4e7-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 265+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-08 21:07 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 265+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2022-01-10 19:20 [PATCH v6] README for 64bit xid Pavel Borisov <[email protected]> 2026-04-08 21:07 [PATCH v1] Shorten pg_attribute_always_inline to pg_always_inline Andres Freund <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox