agora inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH v52 08/10] Introduce an option to make logical replication database specific. 67+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH v52 08/10] Introduce an option to make logical replication database specific. @ 2026-04-03 10:34 Antonin Houska <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-03 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw) By default, the logical decoding assumes access to shared catalogs, so the snapshot builder needs to consider cluster-wide XIDs during startup. That in turn means that, if any transaction is already running (and has XID assigned), the snapshot builder needs to wait for its completion, as it does not know if that transaction performed catalog changes earlier. Possible problem with this concept is that if REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) is running in some database, backends running the same command in other databases get stuck until the first one has committed. Thus only as single backend in the cluster can run REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) at any time. Likewise, REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) can block walsenders starting on behalf of subscriptions throughout the cluster. This patch introduces the possibility for a backend to declare that its output plugin does not use shared catalogs (i.e. catalogs that can be changed by transactions running in other databases in the cluster). In that case, no snapshot the backend will use during the decoding needs to contain information about transactions running in other databases. Thus the snapshot builder only needs to wait for completion of transactions in the current database. Currently we only use this option in the REPACK background worker. It could possibly be used in walsender involved in logical replication too, however that would need thorough analysis of its output plugin. The patch bumps WAL version number, due to a new field in xl_running_xacts. --- contrib/pg_visibility/pg_visibility.c | 4 ++-- src/backend/access/index/genam.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++ src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/standbydesc.c | 2 ++ src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 2 +- src/backend/access/transam/xlogfuncs.c | 2 +- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 8 +++++++ src/backend/postmaster/bgwriter.c | 2 +- src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 10 ++++++++- src/backend/replication/slot.c | 12 +++++++++-- src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++- src/backend/storage/ipc/standby.c | 14 +++++++++++-- src/include/access/genam.h | 8 +++++++ src/include/access/xlog_internal.h | 2 +- src/include/storage/procarray.h | 2 +- src/include/storage/standby.h | 3 ++- src/include/storage/standbydefs.h | 1 + 16 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/contrib/pg_visibility/pg_visibility.c b/contrib/pg_visibility/pg_visibility.c index dfab0b64cf5..d564bd2a00c 100644 --- a/contrib/pg_visibility/pg_visibility.c +++ b/contrib/pg_visibility/pg_visibility.c @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ GetStrictOldestNonRemovableTransactionId(Relation rel) else if (rel == NULL || rel->rd_rel->relisshared) { /* Shared relation: take into account all running xids */ - runningTransactions = GetRunningTransactionData(); + runningTransactions = GetRunningTransactionData(InvalidOid); LWLockRelease(ProcArrayLock); LWLockRelease(XidGenLock); return runningTransactions->oldestRunningXid; @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ GetStrictOldestNonRemovableTransactionId(Relation rel) * Normal relation: take into account xids running within the current * database */ - runningTransactions = GetRunningTransactionData(); + runningTransactions = GetRunningTransactionData(InvalidOid); LWLockRelease(ProcArrayLock); LWLockRelease(XidGenLock); return runningTransactions->oldestDatabaseRunningXid; diff --git a/src/backend/access/index/genam.c b/src/backend/access/index/genam.c index 1408989c568..df092dc999a 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/index/genam.c +++ b/src/backend/access/index/genam.c @@ -37,6 +37,14 @@ #include "utils/ruleutils.h" #include "utils/snapmgr.h" +/* + * If a backend is going to do logical decoding and if the output plugin does + * not need to access shared catalogs, setting this variable to false can make + * the decoding startup faster. In particular, the backend will not need to + * wait for completion of already running transactions in other databases. + */ +bool accessSharedCatalogsInDecoding = true; + /* ---------------------------------------------------------------- * general access method routines @@ -394,6 +402,16 @@ systable_beginscan(Relation heapRelation, SysScanDesc sysscan; Relation irel; + /* + * If this backend promised that it won't access shared catalogs during + * logical decoding, this seems to be the right place to check. + * + * XXX Should this be ereport(ERROR) ? + */ + Assert(!HistoricSnapshotActive() || + accessSharedCatalogsInDecoding || + !heapRelation->rd_rel->relisshared); + if (indexOK && !IgnoreSystemIndexes && !ReindexIsProcessingIndex(indexId)) diff --git a/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/standbydesc.c b/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/standbydesc.c index 0a291354ae2..685d1bdb024 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/standbydesc.c +++ b/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/standbydesc.c @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ standby_desc_running_xacts(StringInfo buf, xl_running_xacts *xlrec) for (i = 0; i < xlrec->subxcnt; i++) appendStringInfo(buf, " %u", xlrec->xids[xlrec->xcnt + i]); } + + appendStringInfo(buf, "; dbid: %u", xlrec->dbid); } void diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index 2c1c6f88b74..8da8eff93e4 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -7336,7 +7336,7 @@ CreateCheckPoint(int flags) * recovery we don't need to write running xact data. */ if (!shutdown && XLogStandbyInfoActive()) - LogStandbySnapshot(); + LogStandbySnapshot(InvalidOid); START_CRIT_SECTION(); diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlogfuncs.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlogfuncs.c index 65bbaeda59c..0f5979691e6 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlogfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlogfuncs.c @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ pg_log_standby_snapshot(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE), errmsg("pg_log_standby_snapshot() can only be used if \"wal_level\" >= \"replica\""))); - recptr = LogStandbySnapshot(); + recptr = LogStandbySnapshot(InvalidOid); /* * As a convenience, return the WAL location of the last inserted record diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index c85166ba849..ff34e246469 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ */ #include "postgres.h" +#include "access/genam.h" #include "access/table.h" #include "access/xlog_internal.h" #include "access/xlogutils.h" @@ -237,6 +238,13 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) EnsureLogicalDecodingEnabled(); + /* + * By declaring that our output plugin does not need shared catalogs, we + * avoid waiting for completion of transactions running in other databases + * than the one we're connected to. + */ + accessSharedCatalogsInDecoding = false; + /* * Neither prepare_write nor do_write callback nor update_progress is * useful for us. diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgwriter.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgwriter.c index 1d8947774a9..a30de4262eb 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgwriter.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgwriter.c @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ BackgroundWriterMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) if (now >= timeout && last_snapshot_lsn <= GetLastImportantRecPtr()) { - last_snapshot_lsn = LogStandbySnapshot(); + last_snapshot_lsn = LogStandbySnapshot(InvalidOid); last_snapshot_ts = now; } } diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c index b4269a3b102..2e3926e1d13 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ #include <sys/stat.h> #include <unistd.h> +#include "access/genam.h" #include "access/heapam_xlog.h" #include "access/transam.h" #include "access/xact.h" @@ -1465,7 +1466,14 @@ SnapBuildWaitSnapshot(xl_running_xacts *running, TransactionId cutoff) */ if (!RecoveryInProgress()) { - LogStandbySnapshot(); + Oid dbid; + + /* + * Only consider transactions of the current database if our plugin is + * not supposed to access shared catalogs. + */ + dbid = accessSharedCatalogsInDecoding ? InvalidOid : MyDatabaseId; + LogStandbySnapshot(dbid); } } diff --git a/src/backend/replication/slot.c b/src/backend/replication/slot.c index a9092fc2382..d553bd5dbff 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/slot.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/slot.c @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/stat.h> +#include "access/genam.h" #include "access/transam.h" #include "access/xlog_internal.h" #include "access/xlogrecovery.h" @@ -1760,9 +1761,16 @@ ReplicationSlotReserveWal(void) if (!RecoveryInProgress() && SlotIsLogical(slot)) { XLogRecPtr flushptr; + Oid dbid; - /* make sure we have enough information to start */ - flushptr = LogStandbySnapshot(); + /* + * Make sure we have enough information to start. + * + * Only consider transactions of the current database if our plugin is + * not supposed to access shared catalogs. + */ + dbid = accessSharedCatalogsInDecoding ? InvalidOid : MyDatabaseId; + flushptr = LogStandbySnapshot(dbid); /* and make sure it's fsynced to disk */ XLogFlush(flushptr); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c index cc207cb56e3..92ed34128e5 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c @@ -2631,9 +2631,11 @@ ProcArrayInstallRestoredXmin(TransactionId xmin, PGPROC *proc) * * Note that if any transaction has overflowed its cached subtransactions * then there is no real need include any subtransactions. + * + * If 'dbid' is valid, only gather transactions running in that database. */ RunningTransactions -GetRunningTransactionData(void) +GetRunningTransactionData(Oid dbid) { /* result workspace */ static RunningTransactionsData CurrentRunningXactsData; @@ -2708,6 +2710,18 @@ GetRunningTransactionData(void) if (!TransactionIdIsValid(xid)) continue; + /* + * Filter by database OID if requested. + */ + if (OidIsValid(dbid)) + { + int pgprocno = arrayP->pgprocnos[index]; + PGPROC *proc = &allProcs[pgprocno]; + + if (proc->databaseId != dbid) + continue; + } + /* * Be careful not to exclude any xids before calculating the values of * oldestRunningXid and suboverflowed, since these are used to clean @@ -2758,6 +2772,12 @@ GetRunningTransactionData(void) PGPROC *proc = &allProcs[pgprocno]; int nsubxids; + /* + * Filter by database OID if requested. + */ + if (OidIsValid(dbid) && proc->databaseId != dbid) + continue; + /* * Save subtransaction XIDs. Other backends can't add or remove * entries while we're holding XidGenLock. @@ -2791,6 +2811,7 @@ GetRunningTransactionData(void) * increases if slots do. */ + CurrentRunningXacts->dbid = dbid; CurrentRunningXacts->xcnt = count - subcount; CurrentRunningXacts->subxcnt = subcount; CurrentRunningXacts->subxid_status = suboverflowed ? SUBXIDS_IN_SUBTRANS : SUBXIDS_IN_ARRAY; diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/standby.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/standby.c index de9092fdf5b..c653ea742bc 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/standby.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/standby.c @@ -1188,6 +1188,14 @@ standby_redo(XLogReaderState *record) xl_running_xacts *xlrec = (xl_running_xacts *) XLogRecGetData(record); RunningTransactionsData running; + /* + * Records issued for specific database are not suitable for physical + * replication because that affects the whole cluster. In particular, + * the list of XID is probably incomplete here. + */ + if (OidIsValid(xlrec->dbid)) + return; + running.xcnt = xlrec->xcnt; running.subxcnt = xlrec->subxcnt; running.subxid_status = xlrec->subxid_overflow ? SUBXIDS_MISSING : SUBXIDS_IN_ARRAY; @@ -1277,11 +1285,12 @@ standby_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * as there's no independent knob to just enable logical decoding. For * details of how this is used, check snapbuild.c's introductory comment. * + * If 'dbid' is valid, only gather transactions running in that database. * * Returns the RecPtr of the last inserted record. */ XLogRecPtr -LogStandbySnapshot(void) +LogStandbySnapshot(Oid dbid) { XLogRecPtr recptr; RunningTransactions running; @@ -1314,7 +1323,7 @@ LogStandbySnapshot(void) * Log details of all in-progress transactions. This should be the last * record we write, because standby will open up when it sees this. */ - running = GetRunningTransactionData(); + running = GetRunningTransactionData(dbid); /* * GetRunningTransactionData() acquired ProcArrayLock, we must release it. @@ -1358,6 +1367,7 @@ LogCurrentRunningXacts(RunningTransactions CurrRunningXacts) xl_running_xacts xlrec; XLogRecPtr recptr; + xlrec.dbid = CurrRunningXacts->dbid; xlrec.xcnt = CurrRunningXacts->xcnt; xlrec.subxcnt = CurrRunningXacts->subxcnt; xlrec.subxid_overflow = (CurrRunningXacts->subxid_status != SUBXIDS_IN_ARRAY); diff --git a/src/include/access/genam.h b/src/include/access/genam.h index b69320a7fc8..56c573399ab 100644 --- a/src/include/access/genam.h +++ b/src/include/access/genam.h @@ -136,6 +136,14 @@ typedef struct IndexOrderByDistance bool isnull; } IndexOrderByDistance; +/* + * Is the backend interested in shared catalogs when performing logical + * decoding? + * + * XXX Is there a better place for this declaration? + */ +extern bool accessSharedCatalogsInDecoding; + /* * generalized index_ interface routines (in indexam.c) */ diff --git a/src/include/access/xlog_internal.h b/src/include/access/xlog_internal.h index 755835d63bf..ae19982d88d 100644 --- a/src/include/access/xlog_internal.h +++ b/src/include/access/xlog_internal.h @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ /* * Each page of XLOG file has a header like this: */ -#define XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC 0xD11E /* can be used as WAL version indicator */ +#define XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC 0xD11F /* can be used as WAL version indicator */ typedef struct XLogPageHeaderData { diff --git a/src/include/storage/procarray.h b/src/include/storage/procarray.h index abdf021e66e..377b3060b9f 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/procarray.h +++ b/src/include/storage/procarray.h @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ extern bool ProcArrayInstallImportedXmin(TransactionId xmin, VirtualTransactionId *sourcevxid); extern bool ProcArrayInstallRestoredXmin(TransactionId xmin, PGPROC *proc); -extern RunningTransactions GetRunningTransactionData(void); +extern RunningTransactions GetRunningTransactionData(Oid dbid); extern bool TransactionIdIsInProgress(TransactionId xid); extern TransactionId GetOldestNonRemovableTransactionId(Relation rel); diff --git a/src/include/storage/standby.h b/src/include/storage/standby.h index 6a314c693cd..8715c08e94f 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/standby.h +++ b/src/include/storage/standby.h @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ typedef enum typedef struct RunningTransactionsData { + Oid dbid; /* only track xacts in this database */ int xcnt; /* # of xact ids in xids[] */ int subxcnt; /* # of subxact ids in xids[] */ subxids_array_status subxid_status; @@ -143,7 +144,7 @@ typedef RunningTransactionsData *RunningTransactions; extern void LogAccessExclusiveLock(Oid dbOid, Oid relOid); extern void LogAccessExclusiveLockPrepare(void); -extern XLogRecPtr LogStandbySnapshot(void); +extern XLogRecPtr LogStandbySnapshot(Oid dbid); extern void LogStandbyInvalidations(int nmsgs, SharedInvalidationMessage *msgs, bool relcacheInitFileInval); diff --git a/src/include/storage/standbydefs.h b/src/include/storage/standbydefs.h index 231d251fd51..e75b7078766 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/standbydefs.h +++ b/src/include/storage/standbydefs.h @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ typedef struct xl_standby_locks */ typedef struct xl_running_xacts { + Oid dbid; /* only track xacts in this database */ int xcnt; /* # of xact ids in xids[] */ int subxcnt; /* # of subxact ids in xids[] */ bool subxid_overflow; /* snapshot overflowed, subxids missing */ -- 2.47.3 --gp2pyozrd5pweboh Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v52-0009-Reserve-replication-slots-specifically-for-REPAC.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names @ 2026-05-26 07:56 Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 67+ messages in thread From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both "datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher". Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names instead. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 4 +- src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 8 +- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++---------- src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 4 +- src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c | 4 +- src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c | 2 +- src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c | 2 +- src/include/miscadmin.h | 10 +- src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h | 30 +-- src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h | 4 +- src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h | 2 +- 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck); if (new_state) - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version); } else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE) { @@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record) * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can * initiate the corresponding processing. */ - EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); + EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state); } } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c @@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct .fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain }, { - .fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain", - .fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain + .fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain", + .fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain } }; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were * disabled. * - * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, + * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start, * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will * be checksummed automatically. All databases from the original list MUST BE * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ * state will also be set to "off". * * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain. When all backends have acknowledged the * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and - * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers. When the - * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, + * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers. When the + * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages, * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier. * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set: * @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this * feature. * - * * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup + * * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup * process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a * restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the * postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the @@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] = * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process. * - * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock + * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock */ -typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct +typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct { /* * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the * launcher what the target state is. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation; int launch_cost_delay; int launch_cost_limit; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited. */ - DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; + DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; int cost_delay; int cost_limit; @@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct */ /* result, set by worker before exiting */ - DataChecksumsWorkerResult success; + DataChecksumWorkerResult success; /* * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared * catalogs */ bool process_shared_catalogs; -} DataChecksumsStateStruct; +} DataChecksumStateStruct; -/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */ -static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState; +/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */ +static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState; -typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase +typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase { Oid dboid; char *dbname; -} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase; +} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase; /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */ static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false; /* - * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag? + * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag? * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting! */ static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false; /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation; +static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation; /* Prototypes */ -static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg); +static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg); static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid); static List *BuildDatabaseList(void); static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared); static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist); -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db); +static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db); static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void); static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy); static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS); static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void); -const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { - .request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest, +const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = { + .request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest, }; #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \ do { \ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); \ if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) \ abort_requested = true; \ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); \ + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); \ } while (0) @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = { */ void -EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) +EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state) { uint64 barrier; @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) } /* - * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier + * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier * Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes * * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state) * used to look up the relevant entry. */ bool -AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) +AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier) { uint32 target_state; int current = data_checksums; @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } @@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero")); - StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); + StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit); PG_RETURN_VOID(); } /***************************************************************************** - * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher + * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher */ /* - * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher - * Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process + * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher + * Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process * * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as * well as disabling. */ void -StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit) +StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0); #endif - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL); /* Store the desired state in shared memory */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op; DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay; @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, /* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */ running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already. @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg * abortion will bubble up from here. */ Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS) abort_requested = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (abort_requested) return false; @@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy) * waiting for it to finish. We have to do this in a separate worker, since * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime. */ -static DataChecksumsWorkerResult -ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) +static DataChecksumWorkerResult +ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db) { BackgroundWorker bgw; BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle; @@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) pid_t pid; char activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64]; - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw)); bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION; bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished; snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres"); - snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain"); + snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker"); bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART; @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", db->dbname), errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes")); - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; } status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid); @@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(WARNING, errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"", @@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out. */ if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid)) - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; else - return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB; + return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB; } /* @@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname)); /* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1, "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid); @@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db) db->dbname), errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums().")); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); - if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED) + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED) ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"", db->dbname)); - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return DataChecksumState->success; } @@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (launcher_running) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid) { ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker")); kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM); } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg) if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn()) SetDataChecksumsOff(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain + * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain * * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with @@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void) * initiating processing. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) { ereport(DEBUG1, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started")); pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler); @@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER; init_ps_display(NULL); - INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running) { ereport(LOG, - errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting")); + errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting")); /* Launcher was already running, let it finish */ - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); return; } @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg) DataChecksumState->operation = operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling @@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again: * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a * failure, so restart processing instead. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto done; } - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES), errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster")); @@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done: * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over * again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation) { DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation; DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay; DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); goto again; } @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done: launcher_running = false; DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } /* @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) int cumulative_total = 0; /* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); /* Get a list of all databases to process */ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(); @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals); } - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList) { - DataChecksumsWorkerResult result; + DataChecksumWorkerResult result; result = ProcessDatabase(db); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS /* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */ - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result")) { - result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result", + result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED; + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result", db->dbname); } #endif @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, ++cumulative_total); - if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED) + if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED) { /* * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"), errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error.")); } - else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) + else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested) { /* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */ return false; @@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs * so we don't have to process them again. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList); @@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void) } /* - * DataChecksumsShmemRequest - * Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory + * DataChecksumShmemRequest + * Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory */ static void -DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg) +DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg) { - ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data", - .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct), + ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data", + .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct), .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState, ); } @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid) * BuildDatabaseList * Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster * - * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to + * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(). @@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void) while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection))) { Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup); - DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db; + DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db; oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx); - db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase)); + db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase)); db->dboid = pgdb->oid; db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname)); @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist) if (!dblist) return; - foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) + foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist) { if (db->dbname != NULL) pfree(db->dbname); @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) } /* - * DataChecksumsWorkerMain + * DataChecksumWorkerMain * * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared) * existing temporary relations with data checksums. */ void -DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) +DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg) { Oid dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg); List *RelationList = NIL; @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals(); - MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER; + MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER; init_ps_display(NULL); BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs * to be refreshed. */ - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay) || (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit)) { @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) } else costs_updated = false; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); if (costs_updated) { @@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(DEBUG1, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) list_free(CurrentTempTables); #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS - if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait")) + if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait")) { /* Make sure to just cause one retry */ if (!retried && numleft == 0) @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) numleft = 1; retried = true; - INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); + INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL); } } #endif @@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) if (aborted || abort_requested) { - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); ereport(LOG, errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u", dboid)); @@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) /* worker done */ pgstat_progress_end_command(); - LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; - LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock); + LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL; + LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock); } diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void) /* also add data checksums processes */ remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER); + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER); /* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */ Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask); diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void) case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF: case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF: - processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type); + processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type); break; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_CHECKPOINTER: case B_IO_WORKER: case B_STARTUP: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: return false; case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype) case B_LOGGER: return false; - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER: - case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER: + case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER: case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER: case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER: case B_BACKEND: diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void) */ Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() || AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || - AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()); + AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()); /* call only once */ Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId)); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid, errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.", username != NULL ? username : "postgres"))); } - else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess()) + else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess()) { if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid)) { diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644 --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType B_WAL_SUMMARIZER, B_WAL_WRITER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, - B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, + B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, /* * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType; #define AmWalSummarizerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER) #define AmWalWriterProcess() (MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER) #define AmIoWorkerProcess() (MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER) -#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \ - (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ - MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER) +#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \ + (MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \ + MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER) #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \ (AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ #include "storage/procsignal.h" -/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */ -typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation +/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */ +typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation { ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, -} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation; +} DataChecksumWorkerOperation; /* * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported @@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation */ typedef enum { - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED, - DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB, -} DataChecksumsWorkerResult; + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED, + DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB, +} DataChecksumWorkerResult; /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */ -bool AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); -void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state); +bool AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier); +void EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state); /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */ /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */ -void StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op, - int cost_delay, - int cost_limit); +void StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op, + int cost_delay, + int cost_limit); /* Background worker entrypoints */ -void DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); -void DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg); +void DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg); #endif /* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */ diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644 --- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h +++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) -PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false) +PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true) PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false) PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true) diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h +++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks) #endif PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks) PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks) -PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks) +PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks) /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks) -- 2.47.3 ----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)---- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 67+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-26 07:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 67+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-04-03 10:34 [PATCH v52 08/10] Introduce an option to make logical replication database specific. Antonin Houska <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> 2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox