agora inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH v8 2/5] instr_time: Represent time as an int64 on all platforms
60+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* [PATCH v8 2/5] instr_time: Represent time as an int64 on all platforms
@ 2023-01-17 04:38  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2023-01-17 04:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Until now we used struct timespec on all platforms but windows. Using struct
timespe causes a fair bit of memory (struct timeval is 16 bytes) and runtime
overhead (much more complicated additions). Instead we can convert the time to
nanoseconds in INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(), making the remaining operations
cheaper.

Representing time as int64 nanoseconds provides sufficient range, ~292 years
relative to a starting point (depending on clock source, relative to the unix
epoch or the system's boot time). That'd not be sufficient for calendar time
stored on disk, but is plenty for runtime interval time measurement.

On windows instr_time already is represented as cycles. It might make sense to
represent time as cycles on other platforms as well, as using cycle
acquisition instructions like rdtsc directly can reduce the overhead of time
acquisition substantially. This could be done in a fairly localized manner as
the code stands after this commit.

Because the windows and non-windows paths are now more similar, use a common
set of macros. To make that possible, most of the use of LARGE_INTEGER had to
be removed, which looks nicer anyway.

To avoid users of the API relying on the integer representation, we wrap the
64bit integer inside struct struct instr_time.

Author: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Author: Lukas Fittl <[email protected]>
Author: David Geier <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
---
 src/include/portability/instr_time.h | 162 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/include/portability/instr_time.h b/src/include/portability/instr_time.h
index 9ea1a68bd94..c0ed491395d 100644
--- a/src/include/portability/instr_time.h
+++ b/src/include/portability/instr_time.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
  *
  * INSTR_TIME_GET_MICROSEC(t)		convert t to uint64 (in microseconds)
  *
+ * INSTR_TIME_GET_NANOSEC(t)		convert t to uint64 (in nanoseconds)
+ *
  * Note that INSTR_TIME_SUBTRACT and INSTR_TIME_ACCUM_DIFF convert
  * absolute times to intervals.  The INSTR_TIME_GET_xxx operations are
  * only useful on intervals.
@@ -54,8 +56,32 @@
 #ifndef INSTR_TIME_H
 #define INSTR_TIME_H
 
+
+/*
+ * We store interval times as an int64 integer on all platforms, as int64 is
+ * cheap to add/subtract, the most common operation for instr_time. The
+ * acquisition of time and converting to specific units of time is platform
+ * specific.
+ *
+ * To avoid users of the API relying on the integer representation, we wrap
+ * the 64bit integer in a struct.
+ */
+typedef struct instr_time
+{
+	int64		ticks;			/* in platforms specific unit */
+} instr_time;
+
+
+/* helpers macros used in platform specific code below */
+
+#define NS_PER_S	INT64CONST(1000000000)
+#define NS_PER_MS	INT64CONST(1000000)
+#define NS_PER_US	INT64CONST(1000)
+
+
 #ifndef WIN32
 
+
 /* Use clock_gettime() */
 
 #include <time.h>
@@ -80,93 +106,43 @@
 #define PG_INSTR_CLOCK	CLOCK_REALTIME
 #endif
 
-typedef struct timespec instr_time;
+/* helper for INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT */
+static inline instr_time
+pg_clock_gettime_ns(void)
+{
+	instr_time	now;
+	struct timespec tmp;
 
-#define INSTR_TIME_IS_ZERO(t)	((t).tv_nsec == 0 && (t).tv_sec == 0)
+	clock_gettime(PG_INSTR_CLOCK, &tmp);
+	now.ticks = tmp.tv_sec * NS_PER_S + tmp.tv_nsec;
 
-#define INSTR_TIME_SET_ZERO(t)	((t).tv_sec = 0, (t).tv_nsec = 0)
+	return now;
+}
 
-#define INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(t)	((void) clock_gettime(PG_INSTR_CLOCK, &(t)))
+#define INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(t) \
+	((t) = pg_clock_gettime_ns())
 
-#define INSTR_TIME_ADD(x,y) \
-	do { \
-		(x).tv_sec += (y).tv_sec; \
-		(x).tv_nsec += (y).tv_nsec; \
-		/* Normalize */ \
-		while ((x).tv_nsec >= 1000000000) \
-		{ \
-			(x).tv_nsec -= 1000000000; \
-			(x).tv_sec++; \
-		} \
-	} while (0)
+#define INSTR_TIME_GET_NANOSEC(t) \
+	((int64) (t).ticks)
 
-#define INSTR_TIME_SUBTRACT(x,y) \
-	do { \
-		(x).tv_sec -= (y).tv_sec; \
-		(x).tv_nsec -= (y).tv_nsec; \
-		/* Normalize */ \
-		while ((x).tv_nsec < 0) \
-		{ \
-			(x).tv_nsec += 1000000000; \
-			(x).tv_sec--; \
-		} \
-	} while (0)
-
-#define INSTR_TIME_ACCUM_DIFF(x,y,z) \
-	do { \
-		(x).tv_sec += (y).tv_sec - (z).tv_sec; \
-		(x).tv_nsec += (y).tv_nsec - (z).tv_nsec; \
-		/* Normalize after each add to avoid overflow/underflow of tv_nsec */ \
-		while ((x).tv_nsec < 0) \
-		{ \
-			(x).tv_nsec += 1000000000; \
-			(x).tv_sec--; \
-		} \
-		while ((x).tv_nsec >= 1000000000) \
-		{ \
-			(x).tv_nsec -= 1000000000; \
-			(x).tv_sec++; \
-		} \
-	} while (0)
-
-#define INSTR_TIME_GET_DOUBLE(t) \
-	(((double) (t).tv_sec) + ((double) (t).tv_nsec) / 1000000000.0)
-
-#define INSTR_TIME_GET_MILLISEC(t) \
-	(((double) (t).tv_sec * 1000.0) + ((double) (t).tv_nsec) / 1000000.0)
-
-#define INSTR_TIME_GET_MICROSEC(t) \
-	(((uint64) (t).tv_sec * (uint64) 1000000) + (uint64) ((t).tv_nsec / 1000))
 
 #else							/* WIN32 */
 
+
 /* Use QueryPerformanceCounter() */
 
-typedef LARGE_INTEGER instr_time;
+/* helper for INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT */
+static inline instr_time
+pg_query_performance_counter(void)
+{
+	instr_time	now;
+	LARGE_INTEGER tmp;
 
-#define INSTR_TIME_IS_ZERO(t)	((t).QuadPart == 0)
+	QueryPerformanceCounter(&tmp);
+	now.ticks = tmp.QuadPart;
 
-#define INSTR_TIME_SET_ZERO(t)	((t).QuadPart = 0)
-
-#define INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(t)	QueryPerformanceCounter(&(t))
-
-#define INSTR_TIME_ADD(x,y) \
-	((x).QuadPart += (y).QuadPart)
-
-#define INSTR_TIME_SUBTRACT(x,y) \
-	((x).QuadPart -= (y).QuadPart)
-
-#define INSTR_TIME_ACCUM_DIFF(x,y,z) \
-	((x).QuadPart += (y).QuadPart - (z).QuadPart)
-
-#define INSTR_TIME_GET_DOUBLE(t) \
-	(((double) (t).QuadPart) / GetTimerFrequency())
-
-#define INSTR_TIME_GET_MILLISEC(t) \
-	(((double) (t).QuadPart * 1000.0) / GetTimerFrequency())
-
-#define INSTR_TIME_GET_MICROSEC(t) \
-	((uint64) (((double) (t).QuadPart * 1000000.0) / GetTimerFrequency()))
+	return now;
+}
 
 static inline double
 GetTimerFrequency(void)
@@ -177,11 +153,45 @@ GetTimerFrequency(void)
 	return (double) f.QuadPart;
 }
 
+#define INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(t) \
+	((t) = pg_query_performance_counter())
+
+#define INSTR_TIME_GET_NANOSEC(t) \
+	((int64) (((double) (t).ticks * NS_PER_S) / GetTimerFrequency()))
+
 #endif							/* WIN32 */
 
-/* same macro on all platforms */
+
+/*
+ * Common macros
+ */
+
+#define INSTR_TIME_IS_ZERO(t)	((t).ticks == 0)
+
+
+#define INSTR_TIME_SET_ZERO(t)	((t).ticks = 0)
 
 #define INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT_LAZY(t) \
 	(INSTR_TIME_IS_ZERO(t) ? INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(t), true : false)
 
+
+#define INSTR_TIME_ADD(x,y) \
+	((x).ticks += (y).ticks)
+
+#define INSTR_TIME_SUBTRACT(x,y) \
+	((x).ticks -= (y).ticks)
+
+#define INSTR_TIME_ACCUM_DIFF(x,y,z) \
+	((x).ticks += (y).ticks - (z).ticks)
+
+
+#define INSTR_TIME_GET_DOUBLE(t) \
+	((double) INSTR_TIME_GET_NANOSEC(t) / NS_PER_S)
+
+#define INSTR_TIME_GET_MILLISEC(t) \
+	((double) INSTR_TIME_GET_NANOSEC(t) / NS_PER_MS)
+
+#define INSTR_TIME_GET_MICROSEC(t) \
+	(INSTR_TIME_GET_NANOSEC(t) / NS_PER_US)
+
 #endif							/* INSTR_TIME_H */
-- 
2.38.0


--vt42kbp2j7rjcapp
Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="v8-0003-instr_time-Add-INSTR_TIME_SET_SECONDS-INSTR_TIME_.patch"



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names
@ 2026-05-26 07:56  Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 60+ messages in thread

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi @ 2026-05-26 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)

datachecksum_state.c currently refers to processes as both
"datachecksum worker/launcher" and "datachecksums launcher".

Use the singular "datachecksum" form consistently for process names
instead.
---
 src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c           |   4 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c           |   8 +-
 src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c | 234 ++++++++++----------
 src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c         |   4 +-
 src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c        |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c      |   4 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c           |   2 +-
 src/include/miscadmin.h                     |  10 +-
 src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h |  30 +--
 src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h       |   4 +-
 src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h         |   2 +-
 13 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index fecdf0d4b05..16f8278809e 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -9178,7 +9178,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		SpinLockRelease(&XLogCtl->info_lck);
 
 		if (new_state)
-			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
+			EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(redo_rec.data_checksum_version);
 	}
 	else if (info == XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS_CHANGE)
 	{
@@ -9256,7 +9256,7 @@ xlog2_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 		 * change to checksum status. Once the barrier has been passed we can
 		 * initiate the corresponding processing.
 		 */
-		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
+		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(state.new_checksum_state);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
index 2e4acad4f00..68256d90cef 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ static const struct
 		.fn_addr = TableSyncWorkerMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
 	},
 	{
-		.fn_name = "DataChecksumsWorkerMain",
-		.fn_addr = DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+		.fn_name = "DataChecksumWorkerMain",
+		.fn_addr = DataChecksumWorkerMain
 	}
 };
 
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
index 33430147ff2..1715e506cbc 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksum_state.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  * checksums enabled, then disabled them and updated the page while they were
  * disabled.
  *
- * The DataChecksumsWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
+ * The DataChecksumWorker will compile a list of all databases at the start,
  * any databases created concurrently will see the in-progress state and will
  * be checksummed automatically.  All databases from the original list MUST BE
  * successfully processed in order for data checksums to be enabled, the only
@@ -99,10 +99,10 @@
  * state will also be set to "off".
  *
  * Backends transition Bd -> Bi via a procsignalbarrier which is emitted by the
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain.  When all backends have acknowledged the
  * barrier then Bd will be empty and the next phase can begin: calculating and
- * writing data checksums with DataChecksumsWorkers.  When the
- * DataChecksumsWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
+ * writing data checksums with DataChecksumWorkers.  When the
+ * DataChecksumWorker processes have finished writing checksums on all pages,
  * data checksums are enabled cluster-wide via another procsignalbarrier.
  * There are four sets of backends where Bd shall be an empty set:
  *
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
  * found on the -hackers threads linked to in the commit message of this
  * feature.
  *
- *   * Launching datachecksumsworker for resuming operation from the startup
+ *   * Launching datachecksumworker for resuming operation from the startup
  *     process: Currently users have to restart processing manually after a
  *     restart since dynamic background worker cannot be started from the
  *     postmaster. Changing the startup process could make restarting the
@@ -280,15 +280,15 @@ static const ChecksumBarrierCondition checksum_barriers[9] =
  * Signaling between backends calling pg_enable/disable_data_checksums, the
  * checksums launcher process, and the checksums worker process.
  *
- * This struct is protected by DataChecksumsWorkerLock
+ * This struct is protected by DataChecksumWorkerLock
  */
-typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
+typedef struct DataChecksumStateStruct
 {
 	/*
 	 * These are set by pg_{enable|disable}_data_checksums, to tell the
 	 * launcher what the target state is.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation launch_operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation launch_operation;
 	int			launch_cost_delay;
 	int			launch_cost_limit;
 
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 * without a lock. If multiple workers, or dynamic cost parameters, are
 	 * supported at some point then this would need to be revisited.
 	 */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+	DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 	int			cost_delay;
 	int			cost_limit;
 
@@ -329,58 +329,58 @@ typedef struct DataChecksumsStateStruct
 	 */
 
 	/* result, set by worker before exiting */
-	DataChecksumsWorkerResult success;
+	DataChecksumWorkerResult success;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tells the worker process whether it should also process the shared
 	 * catalogs
 	 */
 	bool		process_shared_catalogs;
-} DataChecksumsStateStruct;
+} DataChecksumStateStruct;
 
-/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumsworker */
-static DataChecksumsStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
+/* Shared memory segment for datachecksumworker */
+static DataChecksumStateStruct *DataChecksumState;
 
-typedef struct DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase
+typedef struct DataChecksumWorkerDatabase
 {
 	Oid			dboid;
 	char	   *dbname;
-} DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase;
+} DataChecksumWorkerDatabase;
 
 /* Flag set by the interrupt handler */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t abort_requested = false;
 
 /*
- * Have we set the DataChecksumsStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
+ * Have we set the DataChecksumStateStruct->launcher_running flag?
  * If we have, we need to clear it before exiting!
  */
 static volatile sig_atomic_t launcher_running = false;
 
 /* Are we enabling data checksums, or disabling them? */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerOperation operation;
+static DataChecksumWorkerOperation operation;
 
 /* Prototypes */
-static void DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg);
+static void DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static bool DatabaseExists(Oid dboid);
 static List *BuildDatabaseList(void);
 static List *BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared);
 static void FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist);
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db);
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db);
 static bool ProcessAllDatabases(void);
 static bool ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrategy strategy);
 static void launcher_cancel_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS);
 static void WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void);
 
-const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
-	.request_fn = DataChecksumsShmemRequest,
+const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumShmemCallbacks = {
+	.request_fn = DataChecksumShmemRequest,
 };
 
 #define CHECK_FOR_ABORT_REQUEST() \
 	do {															\
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);			\
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)		\
 			abort_requested = true;									\
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);						\
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);						\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ const ShmemCallbacks DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks = {
  */
 
 void
-EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
+EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state)
 {
 	uint64		barrier;
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
 }
 
 /*
- * AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier
+ * AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier
  *		Generic function for absorbing data checksum state changes
  *
  * All procsignalbarriers regarding data checksum state changes are absorbed
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state)
  * used to look up the relevant entry.
  */
 bool
-AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
+AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier)
 {
 	uint32		target_state;
 	int			current = data_checksums;
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ disable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
 				errmsg("must be superuser to change data checksum state"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, 0, 0);
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
@@ -548,27 +548,27 @@ enable_data_checksums(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
 				errmsg("cost limit must be greater than zero"));
 
-	StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
+	StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS, cost_delay, cost_limit);
 
 	PG_RETURN_VOID();
 }
 
 
 /*****************************************************************************
- * Functionality for running the datachecksumsworker and associated launcher
+ * Functionality for running the datachecksum worker and associated launcher
  */
 
 /*
- * StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher
- *		Main entry point for datachecksumsworker launcher process
+ * StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher
+ *		Main entry point for datachecksumworker launcher process
  *
  * The main entrypoint for starting data checksums processing for enabling as
  * well as disabling.
  */
 void
-StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-								 int cost_delay,
-								 int cost_limit)
+StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+								int cost_delay,
+								int cost_limit)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		Assert(cost_delay == 0 && cost_limit == 0);
 #endif
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-startup-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-startup-delay", NULL);
 
 	/* Store the desired state in shared memory */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	DataChecksumState->launch_operation = op;
 	DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay = cost_delay;
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 	/* Is the launcher already running? If so, what is it doing? */
 	running = DataChecksumState->launcher_running;
 
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Launch a new launcher process, if it's not running already.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
 		bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 		bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain");
+		snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum launcher");
 		bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ ProcessSingleRelationFork(Relation reln, ForkNumber forkNum, BufferAccessStrateg
 		 * abortion will bubble up from here.
 		 */
 		Assert(operation == ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS);
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
 		if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation == DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS)
 			abort_requested = true;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (abort_requested)
 			return false;
@@ -795,8 +795,8 @@ ProcessSingleRelationByOid(Oid relationId, BufferAccessStrategy strategy)
  * waiting for it to finish.  We have to do this in a separate worker, since
  * each process can only be connected to one database during its lifetime.
  */
-static DataChecksumsWorkerResult
-ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
+static DataChecksumWorkerResult
+ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db)
 {
 	BackgroundWorker bgw;
 	BackgroundWorkerHandle *bgw_handle;
@@ -804,15 +804,15 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 	pid_t		pid;
 	char		activity[NAMEDATALEN + 64];
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
 	bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS | BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
 	bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_library_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "postgres");
-	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumsWorkerMain");
+	snprintf(bgw.bgw_function_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "%s", "DataChecksumWorkerMain");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_name, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	snprintf(bgw.bgw_type, BGW_MAXLEN, "datachecksum worker");
 	bgw.bgw_restart_time = BGW_NEVER_RESTART;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("The \"%s\" setting might be too low.", "max_worker_processes"));
-		return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+		return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 	}
 
 	status = WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(bgw_handle, &pid);
@@ -840,17 +840,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * If the worker managed to start, and stop, before we got to waiting
 		 * for it we can see a STOPPED status here without it being a failure.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+		if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL)
 		{
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			return DataChecksumState->success;
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		ereport(WARNING,
 				errmsg("could not start background worker for enabling data checksums in database \"%s\"",
@@ -862,9 +862,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 		 * treat it as not an error, else treat as fatal and error out.
 		 */
 		if (DatabaseExists(db->dboid))
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
 		else
-			return DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB;
+			return DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -886,9 +886,9 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 				   db->dbname));
 
 	/* Save the pid of the worker so we can signal it later */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = pid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	snprintf(activity, sizeof(activity) - 1,
 			 "Waiting for worker in database %s (pid %ld)", db->dbname, (long) pid);
@@ -902,17 +902,17 @@ ProcessDatabase(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db)
 					   db->dbname),
 				errhint("Restart the database and restart data checksum processing by calling pg_enable_data_checksums()."));
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
-	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED)
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_SHARED);
+	if (DataChecksumState->success == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED)
 		ereport(LOG,
 				errmsg("data checksums processing was aborted in database \"%s\"",
 					   db->dbname));
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL);
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->worker_pid = InvalidPid;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	return DataChecksumState->success;
 }
@@ -934,14 +934,14 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 
 	if (launcher_running)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if (DataChecksumState->worker_pid != InvalidPid)
 		{
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksums launcher exiting while worker is still running, signalling worker"));
 			kill(DataChecksumState->worker_pid, SIGTERM);
 		}
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -951,10 +951,10 @@ launcher_exit(int code, Datum arg)
 	if (DataChecksumsInProgressOn())
 		SetDataChecksumsOff();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain
  *
  * Main function for launching dynamic background workers for processing data
  * checksums in databases. This function has the bgworker management, with
@@ -1052,11 +1052,11 @@ WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish(void)
  * initiating processing.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 {
 
 	ereport(DEBUG1,
-			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" started"));
+			errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" started"));
 
 	pqsignal(SIGTERM, die);
 	pqsignal(SIGINT, launcher_cancel_handler);
@@ -1065,19 +1065,19 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
-	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumsworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
+	INJECTION_POINT("datachecksumworker-launcher-delay", NULL);
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
 	if (DataChecksumState->launcher_running)
 	{
 		ereport(LOG,
-				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksums launcher\" already running, exiting"));
+				errmsg("background worker \"datachecksum launcher\" already running, exiting"));
 		/* Launcher was already running, let it finish */
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg)
 	DataChecksumState->operation = operation;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 	DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The target state can change while we are busy enabling/disabling
@@ -1134,13 +1134,13 @@ again:
 			 * If the target state changed during processing then it's not a
 			 * failure, so restart processing instead.
 			 */
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 			if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 			{
-				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+				LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 				goto done;
 			}
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES),
 					errmsg("unable to enable data checksums in cluster"));
@@ -1183,14 +1183,14 @@ done:
 	 * while we were running. In that case we will have to start all over
 	 * again.
 	 */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	if (DataChecksumState->launch_operation != operation)
 	{
 		DataChecksumState->operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		operation = DataChecksumState->launch_operation;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_delay = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay;
 		DataChecksumState->cost_limit = DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		goto again;
 	}
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ done:
 
 	launcher_running = false;
 	DataChecksumState->launcher_running = false;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 	int			cumulative_total = 0;
 
 	/* Set up so first run processes shared catalogs, not once in every db */
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 	DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = true;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 	/* Get a list of all databases to process */
 	WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish();
@@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(6, index, vals);
 	}
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, DatabaseList)
 	{
-		DataChecksumsWorkerResult result;
+		DataChecksumWorkerResult result;
 
 		result = ProcessDatabase(db);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
 		/* Allow a test process to alter the result of the operation */
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result"))
 		{
-			result = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED;
-			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fail-db-result",
+			result = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED;
+			INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fail-db-result",
 								   db->dbname);
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE,
 									 ++cumulative_total);
 
-		if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED)
+		if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED)
 		{
 			/*
 			 * Disable checksums on cluster, because we failed one of the
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 					errmsg("data checksums failed to get enabled in all databases, aborting"),
 					errhint("The server log might have more information on the cause of the error."));
 		}
-		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
+		else if (result == DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED || abort_requested)
 		{
 			/* Abort flag set, so exit the whole process */
 			return false;
@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 		 * When one database has completed, it will have done shared catalogs
 		 * so we don't have to process them again.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		DataChecksumState->process_shared_catalogs = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 	}
 
 	FreeDatabaseList(DatabaseList);
@@ -1308,14 +1308,14 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsShmemRequest
- *		Request datachecksumsworker-related shared memory
+ * DataChecksumShmemRequest
+ *		Request datachecksumworker-related shared memory
  */
 static void
-DataChecksumsShmemRequest(void *arg)
+DataChecksumShmemRequest(void *arg)
 {
-	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumsWorker Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumsStateStruct),
+	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "DataChecksumWorker Data",
+					   .size = sizeof(DataChecksumStateStruct),
 					   .ptr = (void **) &DataChecksumState,
 		);
 }
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ DatabaseExists(Oid dboid)
  * BuildDatabaseList
  *		Compile a list of all currently available databases in the cluster
  *
- * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksumsworker workers to
+ * This creates the list of databases for the datachecksum workers to
  * add checksums to. If the caller wants to ensure that no concurrently
  * running CREATE DATABASE calls exist, this needs to be preceded by a call
  * to WaitForAllTransactionsToFinish().
@@ -1393,11 +1393,11 @@ BuildDatabaseList(void)
 	while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = heap_getnext(scan, ForwardScanDirection)))
 	{
 		Form_pg_database pgdb = (Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tup);
-		DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *db;
+		DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *db;
 
 		oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(ctx);
 
-		db = (DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase));
+		db = (DataChecksumWorkerDatabase *) palloc0(sizeof(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase));
 
 		db->dboid = pgdb->oid;
 		db->dbname = pstrdup(NameStr(pgdb->datname));
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ FreeDatabaseList(List *dblist)
 	if (!dblist)
 		return;
 
-	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumsWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
+	foreach_ptr(DataChecksumWorkerDatabase, db, dblist)
 	{
 		if (db->dbname != NULL)
 			pfree(db->dbname);
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
 }
 
 /*
- * DataChecksumsWorkerMain
+ * DataChecksumWorkerMain
  *
  * Main function for enabling checksums in a single database. This is the
  * function set as the bgw_function_name in the dynamic background worker
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ BuildRelationList(bool temp_relations, bool include_shared)
  * existing temporary relations with data checksums.
  */
 void
-DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
+DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 {
 	Oid			dboid = DatumGetObjectId(arg);
 	List	   *RelationList = NIL;
@@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
 
-	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER;
+	MyBackendType = B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER;
 	init_ps_display(NULL);
 
 	BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid(dboid, InvalidOid,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		 * to reflect the new values and signal that the access strategy needs
 		 * to be refreshed.
 		 */
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		if ((DataChecksumState->launch_cost_delay != DataChecksumState->cost_delay)
 			|| (DataChecksumState->launch_cost_limit != DataChecksumState->cost_limit))
 		{
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		}
 		else
 			costs_updated = false;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 
 		if (costs_updated)
 		{
@@ -1634,9 +1634,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 	if (aborted || abort_requested)
 	{
-		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+		LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+		LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 		ereport(DEBUG1,
 				errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 					   dboid));
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 		list_free(CurrentTempTables);
 
 #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
-		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
+		if (IS_INJECTION_POINT_ATTACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait"))
 		{
 			/* Make sure to just cause one retry */
 			if (!retried && numleft == 0)
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 				numleft = 1;
 				retried = true;
 
-				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumsworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
+				INJECTION_POINT_CACHED("datachecksumworker-fake-temptable-wait", NULL);
 			}
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1706,9 +1706,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 
 		if (aborted || abort_requested)
 		{
-			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED;
-			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+			LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+			DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED;
+			LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 			ereport(LOG,
 					errmsg("data checksum processing aborted in database OID %u",
 						   dboid));
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg)
 	/* worker done */
 	pgstat_progress_end_command();
 
-	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumsWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
-	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumsWorkerLock);
+	LWLockAcquire(DataChecksumWorkerLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+	DataChecksumState->success = DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL;
+	LWLockRelease(DataChecksumWorkerLock);
 }
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 90c7c4528e8..0debcb18991 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -3010,8 +3010,8 @@ PostmasterStateMachine(void)
 
 			/* also add data checksums processes */
 			remainMask = btmask_add(remainMask,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-									B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER);
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+									B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER);
 
 			/* All types should be included in targetMask or remainMask */
 			Assert((remainMask.mask | targetMask.mask) == BTYPE_MASK_ALL.mask);
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
index 1397f65f67b..0e0c7acf0df 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ ProcessProcSignalBarrier(void)
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_ON:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_INPROGRESS_OFF:
 					case PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_CHECKSUM_OFF:
-						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(type);
+						processed = AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(type);
 						break;
 				}
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
index 73461c9bca5..bccf6f27121 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_backend.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_CHECKPOINTER:
 		case B_IO_WORKER:
 		case B_STARTUP:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 			return false;
 
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
index 13a5d8e6440..49f0466040b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_io.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ pgstat_tracks_io_bktype(BackendType bktype)
 		case B_LOGGER:
 			return false;
 
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER:
-		case B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER:
+		case B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER:
 		case B_AUTOVAC_WORKER:
 		case B_BACKEND:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index 7ffc808073a..42a0e896f1d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void)
 	 */
 	Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster || AmAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() ||
 		   AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() || AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() ||
-		   AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess());
+		   AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess());
 
 	/* call only once */
 	Assert(!OidIsValid(AuthenticatedUserId));
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
index 2460e550f96..9acd984da42 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/postinit.c
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ InitPostgres(const char *in_dbname, Oid dboid,
 					 errhint("You should immediately run CREATE USER \"%s\" SUPERUSER;.",
 							 username != NULL ? username : "postgres")));
 	}
-	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess())
+	else if (AmBackgroundWorkerProcess() || AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess())
 	{
 		if (username == NULL && !OidIsValid(useroid))
 		{
diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
index 7de0a115402..bc538ac212e 100644
--- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
+++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ typedef enum BackendType
 	B_WAL_SUMMARIZER,
 	B_WAL_WRITER,
 
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER,
-	B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER,
+	B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER,
 
 	/*
 	 * Logger is not connected to shared memory and does not have a PGPROC
@@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT BackendType MyBackendType;
 #define AmWalSummarizerProcess()	(MyBackendType == B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)
 #define AmWalWriterProcess()		(MyBackendType == B_WAL_WRITER)
 #define AmIoWorkerProcess()			(MyBackendType == B_IO_WORKER)
-#define AmDataChecksumsWorkerProcess() \
-	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
-	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER)
+#define AmDataChecksumWorkerProcess() \
+	(MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER || \
+	 MyBackendType == B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER)
 
 #define AmSpecialWorkerProcess() \
 	(AmAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() || \
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
index 2a1ae10d55d..4426f9dc622 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/datachecksum_state.h
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
 
 #include "storage/procsignal.h"
 
-/* Possible operations the DataChecksumsWorker can perform */
-typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
+/* Possible operations the DataChecksumWorker can perform */
+typedef enum DataChecksumWorkerOperation
 {
 	ENABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
 	DISABLE_DATACHECKSUMS,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerOperation;
+} DataChecksumWorkerOperation;
 
 /*
  * Possible states for a database entry which has been processed. Exported
@@ -30,25 +30,25 @@ typedef enum DataChecksumsWorkerOperation
  */
 typedef enum
 {
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_ABORTED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_FAILED,
-	DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_DROPDB,
-} DataChecksumsWorkerResult;
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_SUCCESSFUL = 0,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_ABORTED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_FAILED,
+	DATACHECKSUMWORKER_DROPDB,
+} DataChecksumWorkerResult;
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum state manipulation */
-bool		AbsorbDataChecksumsBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
-void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumsBarrier(uint32 state);
+bool		AbsorbDataChecksumBarrier(ProcSignalBarrierType barrier);
+void		EmitAndWaitDataChecksumBarrier(uint32 state);
 
 /* Prototypes for data checksum background worker */
 
 /* Start the background processes for enabling or disabling checksums */
-void		StartDataChecksumsWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumsWorkerOperation op,
-											 int cost_delay,
-											 int cost_limit);
+void		StartDataChecksumWorkerLauncher(DataChecksumWorkerOperation op,
+											int cost_delay,
+											int cost_limit);
 
 /* Background worker entrypoints */
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
-void		DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerLauncherMain(Datum arg);
+void		DataChecksumWorkerMain(Datum arg);
 
 #endif							/* DATACHECKSUM_STATE_H */
diff --git a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
index b3477e6f17a..ec84860a613 100644
--- a/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
+++ b/src/include/postmaster/proctypelist.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ PG_PROCTYPE(B_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("client backend"), BackendMain, t
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WORKER, "bgworker", gettext_noop("background worker"), BackgroundWorkerMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_BG_WRITER, "bgwriter", gettext_noop("background writer"), BackgroundWriterMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_CHECKPOINTER, "checkpointer", gettext_noop("checkpointer"), CheckpointerMain, true)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
-PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMSWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_LAUNCHER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum launcher"), NULL, false)
+PG_PROCTYPE(B_DATACHECKSUMWORKER_WORKER, "checksums", gettext_noop("datachecksum worker"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_DEAD_END_BACKEND, "backend", gettext_noop("dead-end client backend"), BackendMain, true)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_INVALID, "postmaster", gettext_noop("unrecognized"), NULL, false)
 PG_PROCTYPE(B_IO_WORKER, "ioworker", gettext_noop("io worker"), IoWorkerMain, true)
diff --git a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
index 9ad619080be..e9bd1ce0681 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/subsystemlist.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(InjectionPointShmemCallbacks)
 #endif
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(WaitLSNShmemCallbacks)
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(LogicalDecodingCtlShmemCallbacks)
-PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumsShmemCallbacks)
+PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(DataChecksumShmemCallbacks)
 
 /* AIO subsystem. This delegates to the method-specific callbacks */
 PG_SHMEM_SUBSYSTEM(AioShmemCallbacks)
-- 
2.47.3


----Next_Part(Thu_May_28_12_16_22_2026_214)----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 60+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-26 07:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-17 04:38 [PATCH v8 2/5] instr_time: Represent time as an int64 on all platforms Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
2026-05-26 07:56 [PATCH 4/4] Use singular "datachecksum" consistently in process names Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox