agora inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' 219+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/3] Better express platform requirements in s_lock.h. @ 2026-05-07 20:32 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 219+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-05-07 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/include/storage/s_lock.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/include/storage/s_lock.h b/src/include/storage/s_lock.h index fb872edd2f0..c4369ee4ff6 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/s_lock.h +++ b/src/include/storage/s_lock.h @@ -44,23 +44,16 @@ * atomic test-and-set only when it appears free. * * TAS() and TAS_SPIN() are NOT part of the API, and should never be called - * directly. - * - * CAUTION: on some platforms TAS() and/or TAS_SPIN() may sometimes report - * failure to acquire a lock even when the lock is not locked. For example, - * on Alpha TAS() will "fail" if interrupted. Therefore a retry loop must - * always be used, even if you are certain the lock is free. + * directly. If a platform-specific TAS() is defined, the platform must + * _not_ define its own S_LOCK(). Conversely, if a platform-specific + * S_LOCK() is defined, the platform must _not_ define its own TAS(), but + * it does need to define its own TAS_SPIN(). Currently, all supported + * platforms define TAS() and use the default S_LOCK() implementation, so + * that is probably a good place to start if adding a new one. * * It is the responsibility of these macros to make sure that the compiler * does not re-order accesses to shared memory to precede the actual lock - * acquisition, or follow the lock release. Prior to PostgreSQL 9.5, this - * was the caller's responsibility, which meant that callers had to use - * volatile-qualified pointers to refer to both the spinlock itself and the - * shared data being accessed within the spinlocked critical section. This - * was notationally awkward, easy to forget (and thus error-prone), and - * prevented some useful compiler optimizations. For these reasons, we - * now require that the macros themselves prevent compiler re-ordering, - * so that the caller doesn't need to take special precautions. + * acquisition, or follow the lock release. * * On platforms with weak memory ordering, the TAS(), TAS_SPIN(), and * S_UNLOCK() macros must further include hardware-level memory fence @@ -72,7 +65,7 @@ * * On most supported platforms, TAS() uses a tas() function written * in assembly language to execute a hardware atomic-test-and-set - * instruction. Equivalent OS-supplied mutex routines could be used too. + * instruction. Equivalent compiler intrinsics are another popular option. * * * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2026, PostgreSQL Global Development Group @@ -642,20 +635,25 @@ spin_delay(void) #endif /* !defined(TAS) */ -/* Blow up if we didn't have any way to do spinlocks */ -#ifndef TAS -#error PostgreSQL does not have spinlock support on this platform. Please report this to [email protected]. -#endif - - /* * Default Definitions - override these above as needed. */ -#if !defined(S_LOCK) +/* + * Make sure S_LOCK is defined, either explicitly for the platform or via a TAS + * macro for the platform. Exactly one of either S_LOCK or TAS should be + * defined for a supported platform at this point in the file. + */ +#if defined(S_LOCK) +#if defined(TAS) +#error Both TAS and S_LOCK defined on this platform. Please report this to [email protected]. +#endif +#elif defined(TAS) #define S_LOCK(lock) \ (TAS(lock) ? s_lock((lock), __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__) : 0) -#endif /* S_LOCK */ +#else +#error Neither TAS nor S_LOCK defined on this platform. Please report this to [email protected]. +#endif #if !defined(S_UNLOCK) /* @@ -687,9 +685,19 @@ extern void s_unlock(volatile slock_t *lock); #define SPIN_DELAY() ((void) 0) #endif /* SPIN_DELAY */ +/* + * We can only define TAS_SPIN if TAS was defined. Otherwise, the platform + * defined its own S_LOCK without TAS, and therefore is responsible for + * defining its own TAS_SPIN as well. (Note that we currently do not have any + * platforms that don't define TAS.) + */ #if !defined(TAS_SPIN) +#if defined(TAS) #define TAS_SPIN(lock) TAS(lock) -#endif /* TAS_SPIN */ +#else +#error Neither TAS nor TAS_SPIN defined on this platform. Please report this to [email protected]. +#endif /* TAS */ +#endif /* ! TAS_SPIN */ /* -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --JmXY/Yn6swRVDyih-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 219+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-07 20:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 219+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]> 2026-05-07 20:32 [PATCH v4 3/3] Better express platform requirements in s_lock.h. Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox