agora inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH 1/8] Pass all scan keys to BRIN consistent function at once 12+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH 1/8] Pass all scan keys to BRIN consistent function at once @ 2020-09-12 13:07 Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Tomas Vondra @ 2020-09-12 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw) Passing all scan keys to the BRIN consistent function at once may allow elimination of additional ranges, which would be impossible when only passing individual scan keys. The code continues to support both the original (one scan key at a time) and new (all scan keys at once) approaches, depending on whether the consistent function accepts three or four arguments. This modifies the existing BRIN opclasses (minmax, inclusion) although those don't really benefit from this change. The primary purpose of this is to allow more advanced opclases in the future. Author: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mark Dilger <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected] --- src/backend/access/brin/brin.c | 150 +++++++++++++++----- src/backend/access/brin/brin_inclusion.c | 170 +++++++++++++++-------- src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax.c | 121 +++++++++++----- src/backend/access/brin/brin_validate.c | 4 +- src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat | 4 +- 5 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/brin/brin.c b/src/backend/access/brin/brin.c index 58fe109d2d..8a1a9da78f 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/brin/brin.c +++ b/src/backend/access/brin/brin.c @@ -389,6 +389,9 @@ bringetbitmap(IndexScanDesc scan, TIDBitmap *tbm) BrinMemTuple *dtup; BrinTuple *btup = NULL; Size btupsz = 0; + ScanKey **keys; + int *nkeys; + int keyno; opaque = (BrinOpaque *) scan->opaque; bdesc = opaque->bo_bdesc; @@ -410,6 +413,61 @@ bringetbitmap(IndexScanDesc scan, TIDBitmap *tbm) */ consistentFn = palloc0(sizeof(FmgrInfo) * bdesc->bd_tupdesc->natts); + /* + * Make room for per-attribute lists of scan keys that we'll pass to the + * consistent support procedure. + */ + keys = palloc0(sizeof(ScanKey *) * bdesc->bd_tupdesc->natts); + nkeys = palloc0(sizeof(int) * bdesc->bd_tupdesc->natts); + + /* + * Preprocess the scan keys - split them into per-attribute arrays. + */ + for (keyno = 0; keyno < scan->numberOfKeys; keyno++) + { + ScanKey key = &scan->keyData[keyno]; + AttrNumber keyattno = key->sk_attno; + + /* + * The collation of the scan key must match the collation + * used in the index column (but only if the search is not + * IS NULL/ IS NOT NULL). Otherwise we shouldn't be using + * this index ... + */ + Assert((key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) || + (key->sk_collation == + TupleDescAttr(bdesc->bd_tupdesc, + keyattno - 1)->attcollation)); + + /* First time we see this index attribute, so init as needed. */ + if (!keys[keyattno-1]) + { + FmgrInfo *tmp; + + /* + * This is a bit of an overkill - we don't know how many + * scan keys are there for this attribute, so we simply + * allocate the largest number possible. This may waste + * a bit of memory, but we only expect small number of + * scan keys in general, so this should be negligible, + * and it's cheaper than having to repalloc repeatedly. + */ + keys[keyattno - 1] = palloc0(sizeof(ScanKey) * scan->numberOfKeys); + + /* First time this column, so look up consistent function */ + Assert(consistentFn[keyattno - 1].fn_oid == InvalidOid); + + tmp = index_getprocinfo(idxRel, keyattno, + BRIN_PROCNUM_CONSISTENT); + fmgr_info_copy(&consistentFn[keyattno - 1], tmp, + CurrentMemoryContext); + } + + /* Add key to the per-attribute array. */ + keys[keyattno - 1][nkeys[keyattno - 1]] = key; + nkeys[keyattno - 1]++; + } + /* allocate an initial in-memory tuple, out of the per-range memcxt */ dtup = brin_new_memtuple(bdesc); @@ -470,7 +528,7 @@ bringetbitmap(IndexScanDesc scan, TIDBitmap *tbm) } else { - int keyno; + int attno; /* * Compare scan keys with summary values stored for the range. @@ -480,51 +538,75 @@ bringetbitmap(IndexScanDesc scan, TIDBitmap *tbm) * no keys. */ addrange = true; - for (keyno = 0; keyno < scan->numberOfKeys; keyno++) + for (attno = 1; attno <= bdesc->bd_tupdesc->natts; attno++) { - ScanKey key = &scan->keyData[keyno]; - AttrNumber keyattno = key->sk_attno; - BrinValues *bval = &dtup->bt_columns[keyattno - 1]; + BrinValues *bval; Datum add; - /* - * The collation of the scan key must match the collation - * used in the index column (but only if the search is not - * IS NULL/ IS NOT NULL). Otherwise we shouldn't be using - * this index ... - */ - Assert((key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) || - (key->sk_collation == - TupleDescAttr(bdesc->bd_tupdesc, - keyattno - 1)->attcollation)); + /* skip attributes without any san keys */ + if (nkeys[attno - 1] == 0) + continue; - /* First time this column? look up consistent function */ - if (consistentFn[keyattno - 1].fn_oid == InvalidOid) - { - FmgrInfo *tmp; + bval = &dtup->bt_columns[attno - 1]; - tmp = index_getprocinfo(idxRel, keyattno, - BRIN_PROCNUM_CONSISTENT); - fmgr_info_copy(&consistentFn[keyattno - 1], tmp, - CurrentMemoryContext); - } + Assert((nkeys[attno - 1] > 0) && + (nkeys[attno - 1] <= scan->numberOfKeys)); /* * Check whether the scan key is consistent with the page * range values; if so, have the pages in the range added * to the output bitmap. * - * When there are multiple scan keys, failure to meet the - * criteria for a single one of them is enough to discard - * the range as a whole, so break out of the loop as soon - * as a false return value is obtained. + * The opclass may or may not support processing of multiple + * scan keys. We can determine that based on the number of + * arguments - functions with extra parameter (number of scan + * keys) do support this, otherwise we have to simply pass the + * scan keys one by one, */ - add = FunctionCall3Coll(&consistentFn[keyattno - 1], - key->sk_collation, - PointerGetDatum(bdesc), - PointerGetDatum(bval), - PointerGetDatum(key)); - addrange = DatumGetBool(add); + if (consistentFn[attno - 1].fn_nargs >= 4) + { + Oid collation; + + /* + * Collation from the first key (has to be the same for + * all keys for the same attribue). + */ + collation = keys[attno - 1][0]->sk_collation; + + /* Check all keys at once */ + add = FunctionCall4Coll(&consistentFn[attno - 1], + collation, + PointerGetDatum(bdesc), + PointerGetDatum(bval), + PointerGetDatum(keys[attno - 1]), + Int32GetDatum(nkeys[attno - 1])); + addrange = DatumGetBool(add); + } + else + { + /* + * Check keys one by one + * + * When there are multiple scan keys, failure to meet the + * criteria for a single one of them is enough to discard + * the range as a whole, so break out of the loop as soon + * as a false return value is obtained. + */ + int keyno; + + for (keyno = 0; keyno < nkeys[attno - 1]; keyno++) + { + add = FunctionCall3Coll(&consistentFn[attno - 1], + keys[attno - 1][keyno]->sk_collation, + PointerGetDatum(bdesc), + PointerGetDatum(bval), + PointerGetDatum(keys[attno - 1][keyno])); + addrange = DatumGetBool(add); + if (!addrange) + break; + } + } + if (!addrange) break; } diff --git a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_inclusion.c b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_inclusion.c index 12e5bddd1f..215bc794d3 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_inclusion.c +++ b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_inclusion.c @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static FmgrInfo *inclusion_get_procinfo(BrinDesc *bdesc, uint16 attno, uint16 procnum); static FmgrInfo *inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(BrinDesc *bdesc, uint16 attno, Oid subtype, uint16 strategynum); +static bool inclusion_consistent_key(BrinDesc *bdesc, BrinValues *column, + ScanKey key, Oid colloid); /* @@ -258,53 +260,109 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { BrinDesc *bdesc = (BrinDesc *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0); BrinValues *column = (BrinValues *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(1); - ScanKey key = (ScanKey) PG_GETARG_POINTER(2); - Oid colloid = PG_GET_COLLATION(), - subtype; - Datum unionval; - AttrNumber attno; - Datum query; - FmgrInfo *finfo; - Datum result; - - Assert(key->sk_attno == column->bv_attno); + ScanKey *keys = (ScanKey *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(2); + int nkeys = PG_GETARG_INT32(3); + Oid colloid = PG_GET_COLLATION(); + int keyno; + bool regular_keys = false; - /* Handle IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests. */ - if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) + /* + * First check if there are any IS NULL scan keys, and if we're + * violating them. In that case we can terminate early, without + * inspecting the ranges. + */ + for (keyno = 0; keyno < nkeys; keyno++) { - if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNULL) + ScanKey key = keys[keyno]; + + Assert(key->sk_attno == column->bv_attno); + + /* handle IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) { - if (column->bv_allnulls || column->bv_hasnulls) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); - } + if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNULL) + { + if (column->bv_allnulls || column->bv_hasnulls) + continue; /* this key is fine, continue */ - /* - * For IS NOT NULL, we can only skip ranges that are known to have - * only nulls. - */ - if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNOTNULL) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!column->bv_allnulls); + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + } - /* - * Neither IS NULL nor IS NOT NULL was used; assume all indexable - * operators are strict and return false. - */ - PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + /* + * For IS NOT NULL, we can only skip ranges that are known to have + * only nulls. + */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNOTNULL) + { + if (column->bv_allnulls) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + + continue; + } + + /* + * Neither IS NULL nor IS NOT NULL was used; assume all indexable + * operators are strict and return false. + */ + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + } + else + /* note we have regular (non-NULL) scan keys */ + regular_keys = true; } - /* If it is all nulls, it cannot possibly be consistent. */ - if (column->bv_allnulls) + /* + * If the page range is all nulls, it cannot possibly be consistent if + * there are some regular scan keys. + */ + if (column->bv_allnulls && regular_keys) PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + /* If there are no regular keys, the page range is considered consistent. */ + if (!regular_keys) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + /* It has to be checked, if it contains elements that are not mergeable. */ if (DatumGetBool(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_UNMERGEABLE])) PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); - attno = key->sk_attno; - subtype = key->sk_subtype; - query = key->sk_argument; - unionval = column->bv_values[INCLUSION_UNION]; + /* Check that the range is consistent with all scan keys. */ + for (keyno = 0; keyno < nkeys; keyno++) + { + ScanKey key = keys[keyno]; + + /* ignore IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests handled above */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) + continue; + + /* + * When there are multiple scan keys, failure to meet the + * criteria for a single one of them is enough to discard + * the range as a whole, so break out of the loop as soon + * as a false return value is obtained. + */ + if (!inclusion_consistent_key(bdesc, column, key, colloid)) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + } + + PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); +} + +/* + * inclusion_consistent_key + * Determine if the range is consistent with a single scan key. + */ +static bool +inclusion_consistent_key(BrinDesc *bdesc, BrinValues *column, ScanKey key, + Oid colloid) +{ + FmgrInfo *finfo; + AttrNumber attno = key->sk_attno; + Oid subtype = key->sk_subtype; + Datum query = key->sk_argument; + Datum unionval = column->bv_values[INCLUSION_UNION]; + Datum result; + switch (key->sk_strategy) { /* @@ -324,49 +382,49 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTOverRightStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTOverLeftStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTRightStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTOverRightStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTLeftStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTRightStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTOverLeftStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTBelowStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTOverAboveStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTOverBelowStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTAboveStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTOverAboveStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTBelowStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTAboveStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTOverBelowStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); /* * Overlap and contains strategies @@ -384,7 +442,7 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, key->sk_strategy); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_DATUM(result); + return DatumGetBool(result); /* * Contained by strategies @@ -404,9 +462,9 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) RTOverlapStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); if (DatumGetBool(result)) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + return true; - PG_RETURN_DATUM(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); + return DatumGetBool(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); /* * Adjacent strategy @@ -423,12 +481,12 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) RTOverlapStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); if (DatumGetBool(result)) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + return true; finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, - RTAdjacentStrategyNumber); + RTAdjacentStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_DATUM(result); + return DatumGetBool(result); /* * Basic comparison strategies @@ -458,9 +516,9 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) RTRightStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); if (!DatumGetBool(result)) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + return true; - PG_RETURN_DATUM(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); + return DatumGetBool(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); case RTSameStrategyNumber: case RTEqualStrategyNumber: @@ -468,30 +526,30 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) RTContainsStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); if (DatumGetBool(result)) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + return true; - PG_RETURN_DATUM(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); + return DatumGetBool(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); case RTGreaterEqualStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTLeftStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); if (!DatumGetBool(result)) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + return true; - PG_RETURN_DATUM(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); + return DatumGetBool(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); case RTGreaterStrategyNumber: /* no need to check for empty elements */ finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTLeftStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); default: /* shouldn't happen */ elog(ERROR, "invalid strategy number %d", key->sk_strategy); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + return false; } } diff --git a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax.c b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax.c index 2ffbd9bf0d..12878ff3a0 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax.c +++ b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax.c @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ typedef struct MinmaxOpaque static FmgrInfo *minmax_get_strategy_procinfo(BrinDesc *bdesc, uint16 attno, Oid subtype, uint16 strategynum); +static bool minmax_consistent_key(BrinDesc *bdesc, BrinValues *column, + ScanKey key, Oid colloid); Datum @@ -146,47 +148,104 @@ brin_minmax_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { BrinDesc *bdesc = (BrinDesc *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0); BrinValues *column = (BrinValues *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(1); - ScanKey key = (ScanKey) PG_GETARG_POINTER(2); - Oid colloid = PG_GET_COLLATION(), - subtype; - AttrNumber attno; - Datum value; - Datum matches; - FmgrInfo *finfo; - - Assert(key->sk_attno == column->bv_attno); + ScanKey *keys = (ScanKey *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(2); + int nkeys = PG_GETARG_INT32(3); + Oid colloid = PG_GET_COLLATION(); + int keyno; + bool regular_keys = false; - /* handle IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests */ - if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) + /* + * First check if there are any IS NULL scan keys, and if we're + * violating them. In that case we can terminate early, without + * inspecting the ranges. + */ + for (keyno = 0; keyno < nkeys; keyno++) { - if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNULL) + ScanKey key = keys[keyno]; + + Assert(key->sk_attno == column->bv_attno); + + /* handle IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) { - if (column->bv_allnulls || column->bv_hasnulls) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNULL) + { + if (column->bv_allnulls || column->bv_hasnulls) + continue; /* this key is fine, continue */ + + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + } + + /* + * For IS NOT NULL, we can only skip ranges that are known to have + * only nulls. + */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNOTNULL) + { + if (column->bv_allnulls) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + + continue; + } + + /* + * Neither IS NULL nor IS NOT NULL was used; assume all indexable + * operators are strict and return false. + */ PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); } + else + /* note we have regular (non-NULL) scan keys */ + regular_keys = true; + } - /* - * For IS NOT NULL, we can only skip ranges that are known to have - * only nulls. - */ - if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNOTNULL) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!column->bv_allnulls); + /* + * If the page range is all nulls, it cannot possibly be consistent if + * there are some regular scan keys. + */ + if (column->bv_allnulls && regular_keys) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + + /* If there are no regular keys, the page range is considered consistent. */ + if (!regular_keys) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); - /* - * Neither IS NULL nor IS NOT NULL was used; assume all indexable - * operators are strict and return false. + /* Check that the range is consistent with all scan keys. */ + for (keyno = 0; keyno < nkeys; keyno++) + { + ScanKey key = keys[keyno]; + + /* ignore IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests handled above */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) + continue; + + /* + * When there are multiple scan keys, failure to meet the + * criteria for a single one of them is enough to discard + * the range as a whole, so break out of the loop as soon + * as a false return value is obtained. */ - PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + if (!minmax_consistent_key(bdesc, column, key, colloid)) + PG_RETURN_DATUM(false);; } - /* if the range is all empty, it cannot possibly be consistent */ - if (column->bv_allnulls) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + PG_RETURN_DATUM(true); +} + +/* + * minmax_consistent_key + * Determine if the range is consistent with a single scan key. + */ +static bool +minmax_consistent_key(BrinDesc *bdesc, BrinValues *column, ScanKey key, + Oid colloid) +{ + FmgrInfo *finfo; + AttrNumber attno = key->sk_attno; + Oid subtype = key->sk_subtype; + Datum value = key->sk_argument; + Datum matches; - attno = key->sk_attno; - subtype = key->sk_subtype; - value = key->sk_argument; switch (key->sk_strategy) { case BTLessStrategyNumber: @@ -229,7 +288,7 @@ brin_minmax_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) break; } - PG_RETURN_DATUM(matches); + return DatumGetBool(matches); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_validate.c b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_validate.c index 6d4253c05e..11835d85cd 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_validate.c +++ b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_validate.c @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ brinvalidate(Oid opclassoid) break; case BRIN_PROCNUM_CONSISTENT: ok = check_amproc_signature(procform->amproc, BOOLOID, true, - 3, 3, INTERNALOID, INTERNALOID, - INTERNALOID); + 3, 4, INTERNALOID, INTERNALOID, + INTERNALOID, INT4OID); break; case BRIN_PROCNUM_UNION: ok = check_amproc_signature(procform->amproc, BOOLOID, true, diff --git a/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat b/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat index d7b55f57ea..871e024e00 100644 --- a/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat +++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat @@ -8143,7 +8143,7 @@ prosrc => 'brin_minmax_add_value' }, { oid => '3385', descr => 'BRIN minmax support', proname => 'brin_minmax_consistent', prorettype => 'bool', - proargtypes => 'internal internal internal', + proargtypes => 'internal internal internal int4', prosrc => 'brin_minmax_consistent' }, { oid => '3386', descr => 'BRIN minmax support', proname => 'brin_minmax_union', prorettype => 'bool', @@ -8159,7 +8159,7 @@ prosrc => 'brin_inclusion_add_value' }, { oid => '4107', descr => 'BRIN inclusion support', proname => 'brin_inclusion_consistent', prorettype => 'bool', - proargtypes => 'internal internal internal', + proargtypes => 'internal internal internal int4', prosrc => 'brin_inclusion_consistent' }, { oid => '4108', descr => 'BRIN inclusion support', proname => 'brin_inclusion_union', prorettype => 'bool', -- 2.26.2 --------------CF71AF65F7C337C37C24B045 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=UTF-8; name="0002-Move-IS-NOT-NULL-handling-from-BRIN-support-20210112.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*0="0002-Move-IS-NOT-NULL-handling-from-BRIN-support-20210112.pa"; filename*1="tch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 11/14] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size @ 2024-02-16 01:13 Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Melanie Plageman @ 2024-02-16 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw) TIDBitmap's TBMIterateResult had a flexible sized array of tuple offsets but the API always allocated MaxHeapTuplesPerPage OffsetNumbers. Creating a fixed-size aray of size MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more clear for the API user. --- src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 29 +++++++---------------------- src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c index 0f4850065fb..689a959b467 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c @@ -40,21 +40,12 @@ #include <limits.h> -#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "common/hashfn.h" #include "nodes/bitmapset.h" #include "nodes/tidbitmap.h" #include "storage/lwlock.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" -/* - * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with - * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making - * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size - * is this: - */ -#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - /* * When we have to switch over to lossy storage, we use a data structure * with one bit per page, where all pages having the same number DIV @@ -66,7 +57,7 @@ * table, using identical data structures. (This is because the memory * management for hashtables doesn't easily/efficiently allow space to be * transferred easily from one hashtable to another.) Therefore it's best - * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE, or at least not + * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, or at least not * too different. But we also want PAGES_PER_CHUNK to be a power of 2 to * avoid expensive integer remainder operations. So, define it like this: */ @@ -78,7 +69,7 @@ #define BITNUM(x) ((x) % BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD) /* number of active words for an exact page: */ -#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) +#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) /* number of active words for a lossy chunk: */ #define WORDS_PER_CHUNK ((PAGES_PER_CHUNK - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) @@ -180,7 +171,7 @@ struct TBMIterator int spageptr; /* next spages index */ int schunkptr; /* next schunks index */ int schunkbit; /* next bit to check in current schunk */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* @@ -221,7 +212,7 @@ struct TBMSharedIterator PTEntryArray *ptbase; /* pagetable element array */ PTIterationArray *ptpages; /* sorted exact page index list */ PTIterationArray *ptchunks; /* sorted lossy page index list */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* Local function prototypes */ @@ -389,7 +380,7 @@ tbm_add_tuples(TIDBitmap *tbm, const ItemPointer tids, int ntids, bitnum; /* safety check to ensure we don't overrun bit array bounds */ - if (off < 1 || off > MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE) + if (off < 1 || off > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage) elog(ERROR, "tuple offset out of range: %u", off); /* @@ -691,12 +682,7 @@ tbm_begin_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm) Assert(tbm->iterating != TBM_ITERATING_SHARED); - /* - * Create the TBMIterator struct, with enough trailing space to serve the - * needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMIterator *) palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator)); iterator->tbm = tbm; /* @@ -1470,8 +1456,7 @@ tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa_area *dsa, dsa_pointer dp) * Create the TBMSharedIterator struct, with enough trailing space to * serve the needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. */ - iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator)); istate = (TBMSharedIteratorState *) dsa_get_address(dsa, dp); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h index 1945f0639bf..432fae52962 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef TIDBITMAP_H #define TIDBITMAP_H +#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "storage/itemptr.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" @@ -41,9 +42,16 @@ typedef struct TBMIterateResult { BlockNumber blockno; /* page number containing tuples */ int ntuples; /* -1 indicates lossy result */ - bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ /* Note: recheck is always true if ntuples < 0 */ - OffsetNumber offsets[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; + bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ + + /* + * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with + * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making + * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size is + * this: + */ + OffsetNumber offsets[MaxHeapTuplesPerPage]; } TBMIterateResult; /* function prototypes in nodes/tidbitmap.c */ -- 2.37.2 --5aaqsqqhbq27q3qo Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v4-0012-Separate-TBM-Shared-Iterator-and-TBMIterateResult.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 11/14] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size @ 2024-02-16 01:13 Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Melanie Plageman @ 2024-02-16 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw) TIDBitmap's TBMIterateResult had a flexible sized array of tuple offsets but the API always allocated MaxHeapTuplesPerPage OffsetNumbers. Creating a fixed-size aray of size MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more clear for the API user. --- src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 29 +++++++---------------------- src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c index e8ab5d78fcc..d2bf8f44d50 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ #include <limits.h> -#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "common/hashfn.h" #include "common/int.h" #include "nodes/bitmapset.h" @@ -48,14 +47,6 @@ #include "storage/lwlock.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" -/* - * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with - * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making - * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size - * is this: - */ -#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - /* * When we have to switch over to lossy storage, we use a data structure * with one bit per page, where all pages having the same number DIV @@ -67,7 +58,7 @@ * table, using identical data structures. (This is because the memory * management for hashtables doesn't easily/efficiently allow space to be * transferred easily from one hashtable to another.) Therefore it's best - * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE, or at least not + * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, or at least not * too different. But we also want PAGES_PER_CHUNK to be a power of 2 to * avoid expensive integer remainder operations. So, define it like this: */ @@ -79,7 +70,7 @@ #define BITNUM(x) ((x) % BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD) /* number of active words for an exact page: */ -#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) +#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) /* number of active words for a lossy chunk: */ #define WORDS_PER_CHUNK ((PAGES_PER_CHUNK - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) @@ -181,7 +172,7 @@ struct TBMIterator int spageptr; /* next spages index */ int schunkptr; /* next schunks index */ int schunkbit; /* next bit to check in current schunk */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* @@ -222,7 +213,7 @@ struct TBMSharedIterator PTEntryArray *ptbase; /* pagetable element array */ PTIterationArray *ptpages; /* sorted exact page index list */ PTIterationArray *ptchunks; /* sorted lossy page index list */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* Local function prototypes */ @@ -390,7 +381,7 @@ tbm_add_tuples(TIDBitmap *tbm, const ItemPointer tids, int ntids, bitnum; /* safety check to ensure we don't overrun bit array bounds */ - if (off < 1 || off > MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE) + if (off < 1 || off > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage) elog(ERROR, "tuple offset out of range: %u", off); /* @@ -692,12 +683,7 @@ tbm_begin_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm) Assert(tbm->iterating != TBM_ITERATING_SHARED); - /* - * Create the TBMIterator struct, with enough trailing space to serve the - * needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMIterator *) palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator)); iterator->tbm = tbm; /* @@ -1467,8 +1453,7 @@ tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa_area *dsa, dsa_pointer dp) * Create the TBMSharedIterator struct, with enough trailing space to * serve the needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. */ - iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator)); istate = (TBMSharedIteratorState *) dsa_get_address(dsa, dp); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h index 1945f0639bf..432fae52962 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef TIDBITMAP_H #define TIDBITMAP_H +#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "storage/itemptr.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" @@ -41,9 +42,16 @@ typedef struct TBMIterateResult { BlockNumber blockno; /* page number containing tuples */ int ntuples; /* -1 indicates lossy result */ - bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ /* Note: recheck is always true if ntuples < 0 */ - OffsetNumber offsets[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; + bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ + + /* + * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with + * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making + * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size is + * this: + */ + OffsetNumber offsets[MaxHeapTuplesPerPage]; } TBMIterateResult; /* function prototypes in nodes/tidbitmap.c */ -- 2.37.2 --6kjpcnqyi64ibp5i Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v5-0012-Separate-TBM-Shared-Iterator-and-TBMIterateResult.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 11/14] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size @ 2024-02-16 01:13 Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Melanie Plageman @ 2024-02-16 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw) TIDBitmap's TBMIterateResult had a flexible sized array of tuple offsets but the API always allocated MaxHeapTuplesPerPage OffsetNumbers. Creating a fixed-size aray of size MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more clear for the API user. --- src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 29 +++++++---------------------- src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c index e8ab5d78fcc..d2bf8f44d50 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ #include <limits.h> -#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "common/hashfn.h" #include "common/int.h" #include "nodes/bitmapset.h" @@ -48,14 +47,6 @@ #include "storage/lwlock.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" -/* - * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with - * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making - * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size - * is this: - */ -#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - /* * When we have to switch over to lossy storage, we use a data structure * with one bit per page, where all pages having the same number DIV @@ -67,7 +58,7 @@ * table, using identical data structures. (This is because the memory * management for hashtables doesn't easily/efficiently allow space to be * transferred easily from one hashtable to another.) Therefore it's best - * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE, or at least not + * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, or at least not * too different. But we also want PAGES_PER_CHUNK to be a power of 2 to * avoid expensive integer remainder operations. So, define it like this: */ @@ -79,7 +70,7 @@ #define BITNUM(x) ((x) % BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD) /* number of active words for an exact page: */ -#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) +#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) /* number of active words for a lossy chunk: */ #define WORDS_PER_CHUNK ((PAGES_PER_CHUNK - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) @@ -181,7 +172,7 @@ struct TBMIterator int spageptr; /* next spages index */ int schunkptr; /* next schunks index */ int schunkbit; /* next bit to check in current schunk */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* @@ -222,7 +213,7 @@ struct TBMSharedIterator PTEntryArray *ptbase; /* pagetable element array */ PTIterationArray *ptpages; /* sorted exact page index list */ PTIterationArray *ptchunks; /* sorted lossy page index list */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* Local function prototypes */ @@ -390,7 +381,7 @@ tbm_add_tuples(TIDBitmap *tbm, const ItemPointer tids, int ntids, bitnum; /* safety check to ensure we don't overrun bit array bounds */ - if (off < 1 || off > MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE) + if (off < 1 || off > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage) elog(ERROR, "tuple offset out of range: %u", off); /* @@ -692,12 +683,7 @@ tbm_begin_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm) Assert(tbm->iterating != TBM_ITERATING_SHARED); - /* - * Create the TBMIterator struct, with enough trailing space to serve the - * needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMIterator *) palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator)); iterator->tbm = tbm; /* @@ -1467,8 +1453,7 @@ tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa_area *dsa, dsa_pointer dp) * Create the TBMSharedIterator struct, with enough trailing space to * serve the needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. */ - iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator)); istate = (TBMSharedIteratorState *) dsa_get_address(dsa, dp); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h index 1945f0639bf..432fae52962 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef TIDBITMAP_H #define TIDBITMAP_H +#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "storage/itemptr.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" @@ -41,9 +42,16 @@ typedef struct TBMIterateResult { BlockNumber blockno; /* page number containing tuples */ int ntuples; /* -1 indicates lossy result */ - bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ /* Note: recheck is always true if ntuples < 0 */ - OffsetNumber offsets[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; + bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ + + /* + * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with + * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making + * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size is + * this: + */ + OffsetNumber offsets[MaxHeapTuplesPerPage]; } TBMIterateResult; /* function prototypes in nodes/tidbitmap.c */ -- 2.40.1 --w4wcjcocxsm37usi Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v6-0012-Separate-TBM-Shared-Iterator-and-TBMIterateResult.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 10/13] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size @ 2024-02-16 01:13 Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Melanie Plageman @ 2024-02-16 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw) TIDBitmap's TBMIterateResult had a flexible sized array of tuple offsets but the API always allocated MaxHeapTuplesPerPage OffsetNumbers. Creating a fixed-size aray of size MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more clear for the API user. --- src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 29 +++++++---------------------- src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c index 0f4850065fb..689a959b467 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c @@ -40,21 +40,12 @@ #include <limits.h> -#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "common/hashfn.h" #include "nodes/bitmapset.h" #include "nodes/tidbitmap.h" #include "storage/lwlock.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" -/* - * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with - * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making - * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size - * is this: - */ -#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - /* * When we have to switch over to lossy storage, we use a data structure * with one bit per page, where all pages having the same number DIV @@ -66,7 +57,7 @@ * table, using identical data structures. (This is because the memory * management for hashtables doesn't easily/efficiently allow space to be * transferred easily from one hashtable to another.) Therefore it's best - * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE, or at least not + * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, or at least not * too different. But we also want PAGES_PER_CHUNK to be a power of 2 to * avoid expensive integer remainder operations. So, define it like this: */ @@ -78,7 +69,7 @@ #define BITNUM(x) ((x) % BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD) /* number of active words for an exact page: */ -#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) +#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) /* number of active words for a lossy chunk: */ #define WORDS_PER_CHUNK ((PAGES_PER_CHUNK - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) @@ -180,7 +171,7 @@ struct TBMIterator int spageptr; /* next spages index */ int schunkptr; /* next schunks index */ int schunkbit; /* next bit to check in current schunk */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* @@ -221,7 +212,7 @@ struct TBMSharedIterator PTEntryArray *ptbase; /* pagetable element array */ PTIterationArray *ptpages; /* sorted exact page index list */ PTIterationArray *ptchunks; /* sorted lossy page index list */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* Local function prototypes */ @@ -389,7 +380,7 @@ tbm_add_tuples(TIDBitmap *tbm, const ItemPointer tids, int ntids, bitnum; /* safety check to ensure we don't overrun bit array bounds */ - if (off < 1 || off > MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE) + if (off < 1 || off > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage) elog(ERROR, "tuple offset out of range: %u", off); /* @@ -691,12 +682,7 @@ tbm_begin_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm) Assert(tbm->iterating != TBM_ITERATING_SHARED); - /* - * Create the TBMIterator struct, with enough trailing space to serve the - * needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMIterator *) palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator)); iterator->tbm = tbm; /* @@ -1470,8 +1456,7 @@ tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa_area *dsa, dsa_pointer dp) * Create the TBMSharedIterator struct, with enough trailing space to * serve the needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. */ - iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator)); istate = (TBMSharedIteratorState *) dsa_get_address(dsa, dp); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h index 1945f0639bf..432fae52962 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef TIDBITMAP_H #define TIDBITMAP_H +#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "storage/itemptr.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" @@ -41,9 +42,16 @@ typedef struct TBMIterateResult { BlockNumber blockno; /* page number containing tuples */ int ntuples; /* -1 indicates lossy result */ - bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ /* Note: recheck is always true if ntuples < 0 */ - OffsetNumber offsets[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; + bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ + + /* + * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with + * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making + * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size is + * this: + */ + OffsetNumber offsets[MaxHeapTuplesPerPage]; } TBMIterateResult; /* function prototypes in nodes/tidbitmap.c */ -- 2.37.2 --fa5b4qdlc6zixc7z Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v3-0011-Separate-TBM-Shared-Iterator-and-TBMIterateResult.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v13 12/16] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size @ 2024-02-16 01:13 Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Melanie Plageman @ 2024-02-16 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw) TIDBitmap's TBMIterateResult had a flexible sized array of tuple offsets but the API always allocated MaxHeapTuplesPerPage OffsetNumbers. Creating a fixed-size aray of size MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more clear for the API user. --- src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 33 +++++++-------------------------- src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c index e8ab5d78fc..1dc4c99bf9 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ #include <limits.h> -#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "common/hashfn.h" #include "common/int.h" #include "nodes/bitmapset.h" @@ -48,14 +47,6 @@ #include "storage/lwlock.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" -/* - * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with - * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making - * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size - * is this: - */ -#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - /* * When we have to switch over to lossy storage, we use a data structure * with one bit per page, where all pages having the same number DIV @@ -67,7 +58,7 @@ * table, using identical data structures. (This is because the memory * management for hashtables doesn't easily/efficiently allow space to be * transferred easily from one hashtable to another.) Therefore it's best - * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE, or at least not + * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, or at least not * too different. But we also want PAGES_PER_CHUNK to be a power of 2 to * avoid expensive integer remainder operations. So, define it like this: */ @@ -79,7 +70,7 @@ #define BITNUM(x) ((x) % BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD) /* number of active words for an exact page: */ -#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) +#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) /* number of active words for a lossy chunk: */ #define WORDS_PER_CHUNK ((PAGES_PER_CHUNK - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) @@ -181,7 +172,7 @@ struct TBMIterator int spageptr; /* next spages index */ int schunkptr; /* next schunks index */ int schunkbit; /* next bit to check in current schunk */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* @@ -222,7 +213,7 @@ struct TBMSharedIterator PTEntryArray *ptbase; /* pagetable element array */ PTIterationArray *ptpages; /* sorted exact page index list */ PTIterationArray *ptchunks; /* sorted lossy page index list */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* Local function prototypes */ @@ -390,7 +381,7 @@ tbm_add_tuples(TIDBitmap *tbm, const ItemPointer tids, int ntids, bitnum; /* safety check to ensure we don't overrun bit array bounds */ - if (off < 1 || off > MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE) + if (off < 1 || off > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage) elog(ERROR, "tuple offset out of range: %u", off); /* @@ -692,12 +683,7 @@ tbm_begin_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm) Assert(tbm->iterating != TBM_ITERATING_SHARED); - /* - * Create the TBMIterator struct, with enough trailing space to serve the - * needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMIterator *) palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator)); iterator->tbm = tbm; /* @@ -1463,12 +1449,7 @@ tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa_area *dsa, dsa_pointer dp) TBMSharedIterator *iterator; TBMSharedIteratorState *istate; - /* - * Create the TBMSharedIterator struct, with enough trailing space to - * serve the needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator)); istate = (TBMSharedIteratorState *) dsa_get_address(dsa, dp); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h index 1945f0639b..432fae5296 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef TIDBITMAP_H #define TIDBITMAP_H +#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "storage/itemptr.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" @@ -41,9 +42,16 @@ typedef struct TBMIterateResult { BlockNumber blockno; /* page number containing tuples */ int ntuples; /* -1 indicates lossy result */ - bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ /* Note: recheck is always true if ntuples < 0 */ - OffsetNumber offsets[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; + bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ + + /* + * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with + * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making + * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size is + * this: + */ + OffsetNumber offsets[MaxHeapTuplesPerPage]; } TBMIterateResult; /* function prototypes in nodes/tidbitmap.c */ -- 2.40.1 --cuuqjeyokkhgd736 Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v13-0013-Separate-TBM-Shared-Iterator-and-TBMIterateResul.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v7 10/13] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size @ 2024-02-16 01:13 Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Melanie Plageman @ 2024-02-16 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw) TIDBitmap's TBMIterateResult had a flexible sized array of tuple offsets but the API always allocated MaxHeapTuplesPerPage OffsetNumbers. Creating a fixed-size aray of size MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more clear for the API user. --- src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 29 +++++++---------------------- src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c index e8ab5d78fcc..d2bf8f44d50 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ #include <limits.h> -#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "common/hashfn.h" #include "common/int.h" #include "nodes/bitmapset.h" @@ -48,14 +47,6 @@ #include "storage/lwlock.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" -/* - * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with - * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making - * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size - * is this: - */ -#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - /* * When we have to switch over to lossy storage, we use a data structure * with one bit per page, where all pages having the same number DIV @@ -67,7 +58,7 @@ * table, using identical data structures. (This is because the memory * management for hashtables doesn't easily/efficiently allow space to be * transferred easily from one hashtable to another.) Therefore it's best - * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE, or at least not + * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, or at least not * too different. But we also want PAGES_PER_CHUNK to be a power of 2 to * avoid expensive integer remainder operations. So, define it like this: */ @@ -79,7 +70,7 @@ #define BITNUM(x) ((x) % BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD) /* number of active words for an exact page: */ -#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) +#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) /* number of active words for a lossy chunk: */ #define WORDS_PER_CHUNK ((PAGES_PER_CHUNK - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) @@ -181,7 +172,7 @@ struct TBMIterator int spageptr; /* next spages index */ int schunkptr; /* next schunks index */ int schunkbit; /* next bit to check in current schunk */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* @@ -222,7 +213,7 @@ struct TBMSharedIterator PTEntryArray *ptbase; /* pagetable element array */ PTIterationArray *ptpages; /* sorted exact page index list */ PTIterationArray *ptchunks; /* sorted lossy page index list */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* Local function prototypes */ @@ -390,7 +381,7 @@ tbm_add_tuples(TIDBitmap *tbm, const ItemPointer tids, int ntids, bitnum; /* safety check to ensure we don't overrun bit array bounds */ - if (off < 1 || off > MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE) + if (off < 1 || off > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage) elog(ERROR, "tuple offset out of range: %u", off); /* @@ -692,12 +683,7 @@ tbm_begin_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm) Assert(tbm->iterating != TBM_ITERATING_SHARED); - /* - * Create the TBMIterator struct, with enough trailing space to serve the - * needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMIterator *) palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator)); iterator->tbm = tbm; /* @@ -1467,8 +1453,7 @@ tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa_area *dsa, dsa_pointer dp) * Create the TBMSharedIterator struct, with enough trailing space to * serve the needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. */ - iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator)); istate = (TBMSharedIteratorState *) dsa_get_address(dsa, dp); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h index 1945f0639bf..432fae52962 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef TIDBITMAP_H #define TIDBITMAP_H +#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "storage/itemptr.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" @@ -41,9 +42,16 @@ typedef struct TBMIterateResult { BlockNumber blockno; /* page number containing tuples */ int ntuples; /* -1 indicates lossy result */ - bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ /* Note: recheck is always true if ntuples < 0 */ - OffsetNumber offsets[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; + bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ + + /* + * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with + * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making + * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size is + * this: + */ + OffsetNumber offsets[MaxHeapTuplesPerPage]; } TBMIterateResult; /* function prototypes in nodes/tidbitmap.c */ -- 2.40.1 --kqqpqghcwbcc3dt5 Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v7-0011-Separate-TBM-Shared-Iterator-and-TBMIterateResult.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 10/17] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size @ 2024-02-16 01:13 Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Melanie Plageman @ 2024-02-16 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw) TIDBitmap's TBMIterateResult had a flexible sized array of tuple offsets but the API always allocated MaxHeapTuplesPerPage OffsetNumbers. Creating a fixed-size aray of size MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more clear for the API user. --- src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 33 +++++++-------------------------- src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c index e8ab5d78fc..1dc4c99bf9 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ #include <limits.h> -#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "common/hashfn.h" #include "common/int.h" #include "nodes/bitmapset.h" @@ -48,14 +47,6 @@ #include "storage/lwlock.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" -/* - * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with - * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making - * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size - * is this: - */ -#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - /* * When we have to switch over to lossy storage, we use a data structure * with one bit per page, where all pages having the same number DIV @@ -67,7 +58,7 @@ * table, using identical data structures. (This is because the memory * management for hashtables doesn't easily/efficiently allow space to be * transferred easily from one hashtable to another.) Therefore it's best - * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE, or at least not + * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, or at least not * too different. But we also want PAGES_PER_CHUNK to be a power of 2 to * avoid expensive integer remainder operations. So, define it like this: */ @@ -79,7 +70,7 @@ #define BITNUM(x) ((x) % BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD) /* number of active words for an exact page: */ -#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) +#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) /* number of active words for a lossy chunk: */ #define WORDS_PER_CHUNK ((PAGES_PER_CHUNK - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) @@ -181,7 +172,7 @@ struct TBMIterator int spageptr; /* next spages index */ int schunkptr; /* next schunks index */ int schunkbit; /* next bit to check in current schunk */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* @@ -222,7 +213,7 @@ struct TBMSharedIterator PTEntryArray *ptbase; /* pagetable element array */ PTIterationArray *ptpages; /* sorted exact page index list */ PTIterationArray *ptchunks; /* sorted lossy page index list */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* Local function prototypes */ @@ -390,7 +381,7 @@ tbm_add_tuples(TIDBitmap *tbm, const ItemPointer tids, int ntids, bitnum; /* safety check to ensure we don't overrun bit array bounds */ - if (off < 1 || off > MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE) + if (off < 1 || off > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage) elog(ERROR, "tuple offset out of range: %u", off); /* @@ -692,12 +683,7 @@ tbm_begin_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm) Assert(tbm->iterating != TBM_ITERATING_SHARED); - /* - * Create the TBMIterator struct, with enough trailing space to serve the - * needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMIterator *) palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator)); iterator->tbm = tbm; /* @@ -1463,12 +1449,7 @@ tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa_area *dsa, dsa_pointer dp) TBMSharedIterator *iterator; TBMSharedIteratorState *istate; - /* - * Create the TBMSharedIterator struct, with enough trailing space to - * serve the needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator)); istate = (TBMSharedIteratorState *) dsa_get_address(dsa, dp); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h index 1945f0639b..432fae5296 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef TIDBITMAP_H #define TIDBITMAP_H +#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "storage/itemptr.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" @@ -41,9 +42,16 @@ typedef struct TBMIterateResult { BlockNumber blockno; /* page number containing tuples */ int ntuples; /* -1 indicates lossy result */ - bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ /* Note: recheck is always true if ntuples < 0 */ - OffsetNumber offsets[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; + bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ + + /* + * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with + * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making + * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size is + * this: + */ + OffsetNumber offsets[MaxHeapTuplesPerPage]; } TBMIterateResult; /* function prototypes in nodes/tidbitmap.c */ -- 2.40.1 --xqq4defy3uncu6k6 Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v8-0011-table_scan_bitmap_next_block-counts-lossy-and-exa.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v9 11/17] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size @ 2024-02-16 01:13 Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Melanie Plageman @ 2024-02-16 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw) TIDBitmap's TBMIterateResult had a flexible sized array of tuple offsets but the API always allocated MaxHeapTuplesPerPage OffsetNumbers. Creating a fixed-size aray of size MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more clear for the API user. --- src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 33 +++++++-------------------------- src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c index e8ab5d78fc..1dc4c99bf9 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ #include <limits.h> -#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "common/hashfn.h" #include "common/int.h" #include "nodes/bitmapset.h" @@ -48,14 +47,6 @@ #include "storage/lwlock.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" -/* - * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with - * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making - * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size - * is this: - */ -#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - /* * When we have to switch over to lossy storage, we use a data structure * with one bit per page, where all pages having the same number DIV @@ -67,7 +58,7 @@ * table, using identical data structures. (This is because the memory * management for hashtables doesn't easily/efficiently allow space to be * transferred easily from one hashtable to another.) Therefore it's best - * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE, or at least not + * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, or at least not * too different. But we also want PAGES_PER_CHUNK to be a power of 2 to * avoid expensive integer remainder operations. So, define it like this: */ @@ -79,7 +70,7 @@ #define BITNUM(x) ((x) % BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD) /* number of active words for an exact page: */ -#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) +#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) /* number of active words for a lossy chunk: */ #define WORDS_PER_CHUNK ((PAGES_PER_CHUNK - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) @@ -181,7 +172,7 @@ struct TBMIterator int spageptr; /* next spages index */ int schunkptr; /* next schunks index */ int schunkbit; /* next bit to check in current schunk */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* @@ -222,7 +213,7 @@ struct TBMSharedIterator PTEntryArray *ptbase; /* pagetable element array */ PTIterationArray *ptpages; /* sorted exact page index list */ PTIterationArray *ptchunks; /* sorted lossy page index list */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* Local function prototypes */ @@ -390,7 +381,7 @@ tbm_add_tuples(TIDBitmap *tbm, const ItemPointer tids, int ntids, bitnum; /* safety check to ensure we don't overrun bit array bounds */ - if (off < 1 || off > MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE) + if (off < 1 || off > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage) elog(ERROR, "tuple offset out of range: %u", off); /* @@ -692,12 +683,7 @@ tbm_begin_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm) Assert(tbm->iterating != TBM_ITERATING_SHARED); - /* - * Create the TBMIterator struct, with enough trailing space to serve the - * needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMIterator *) palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator)); iterator->tbm = tbm; /* @@ -1463,12 +1449,7 @@ tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa_area *dsa, dsa_pointer dp) TBMSharedIterator *iterator; TBMSharedIteratorState *istate; - /* - * Create the TBMSharedIterator struct, with enough trailing space to - * serve the needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator)); istate = (TBMSharedIteratorState *) dsa_get_address(dsa, dp); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h index 1945f0639b..432fae5296 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef TIDBITMAP_H #define TIDBITMAP_H +#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "storage/itemptr.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" @@ -41,9 +42,16 @@ typedef struct TBMIterateResult { BlockNumber blockno; /* page number containing tuples */ int ntuples; /* -1 indicates lossy result */ - bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ /* Note: recheck is always true if ntuples < 0 */ - OffsetNumber offsets[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; + bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ + + /* + * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with + * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making + * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size is + * this: + */ + OffsetNumber offsets[MaxHeapTuplesPerPage]; } TBMIterateResult; /* function prototypes in nodes/tidbitmap.c */ -- 2.40.1 --7mdtsjmrzitrgzgx Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v9-0012-Separate-TBM-Shared-Iterator-and-TBMIterateResult.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v10 12/17] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size @ 2024-02-16 01:13 Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Melanie Plageman @ 2024-02-16 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw) TIDBitmap's TBMIterateResult had a flexible sized array of tuple offsets but the API always allocated MaxHeapTuplesPerPage OffsetNumbers. Creating a fixed-size aray of size MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more clear for the API user. --- src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 33 +++++++-------------------------- src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c index e8ab5d78fc..1dc4c99bf9 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ #include <limits.h> -#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "common/hashfn.h" #include "common/int.h" #include "nodes/bitmapset.h" @@ -48,14 +47,6 @@ #include "storage/lwlock.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" -/* - * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with - * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making - * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size - * is this: - */ -#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - /* * When we have to switch over to lossy storage, we use a data structure * with one bit per page, where all pages having the same number DIV @@ -67,7 +58,7 @@ * table, using identical data structures. (This is because the memory * management for hashtables doesn't easily/efficiently allow space to be * transferred easily from one hashtable to another.) Therefore it's best - * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE, or at least not + * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, or at least not * too different. But we also want PAGES_PER_CHUNK to be a power of 2 to * avoid expensive integer remainder operations. So, define it like this: */ @@ -79,7 +70,7 @@ #define BITNUM(x) ((x) % BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD) /* number of active words for an exact page: */ -#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) +#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) /* number of active words for a lossy chunk: */ #define WORDS_PER_CHUNK ((PAGES_PER_CHUNK - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) @@ -181,7 +172,7 @@ struct TBMIterator int spageptr; /* next spages index */ int schunkptr; /* next schunks index */ int schunkbit; /* next bit to check in current schunk */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* @@ -222,7 +213,7 @@ struct TBMSharedIterator PTEntryArray *ptbase; /* pagetable element array */ PTIterationArray *ptpages; /* sorted exact page index list */ PTIterationArray *ptchunks; /* sorted lossy page index list */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* Local function prototypes */ @@ -390,7 +381,7 @@ tbm_add_tuples(TIDBitmap *tbm, const ItemPointer tids, int ntids, bitnum; /* safety check to ensure we don't overrun bit array bounds */ - if (off < 1 || off > MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE) + if (off < 1 || off > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage) elog(ERROR, "tuple offset out of range: %u", off); /* @@ -692,12 +683,7 @@ tbm_begin_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm) Assert(tbm->iterating != TBM_ITERATING_SHARED); - /* - * Create the TBMIterator struct, with enough trailing space to serve the - * needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMIterator *) palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator)); iterator->tbm = tbm; /* @@ -1463,12 +1449,7 @@ tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa_area *dsa, dsa_pointer dp) TBMSharedIterator *iterator; TBMSharedIteratorState *istate; - /* - * Create the TBMSharedIterator struct, with enough trailing space to - * serve the needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator)); istate = (TBMSharedIteratorState *) dsa_get_address(dsa, dp); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h index 1945f0639b..432fae5296 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef TIDBITMAP_H #define TIDBITMAP_H +#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "storage/itemptr.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" @@ -41,9 +42,16 @@ typedef struct TBMIterateResult { BlockNumber blockno; /* page number containing tuples */ int ntuples; /* -1 indicates lossy result */ - bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ /* Note: recheck is always true if ntuples < 0 */ - OffsetNumber offsets[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; + bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ + + /* + * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with + * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making + * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size is + * this: + */ + OffsetNumber offsets[MaxHeapTuplesPerPage]; } TBMIterateResult; /* function prototypes in nodes/tidbitmap.c */ -- 2.40.1 --3o7pc6dfau5a5hry Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v10-0013-Separate-TBM-Shared-Iterator-and-TBMIterateResul.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11 12/17] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size @ 2024-02-16 01:13 Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Melanie Plageman @ 2024-02-16 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw) TIDBitmap's TBMIterateResult had a flexible sized array of tuple offsets but the API always allocated MaxHeapTuplesPerPage OffsetNumbers. Creating a fixed-size aray of size MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more clear for the API user. --- src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 33 +++++++-------------------------- src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c index e8ab5d78fc..1dc4c99bf9 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ #include <limits.h> -#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "common/hashfn.h" #include "common/int.h" #include "nodes/bitmapset.h" @@ -48,14 +47,6 @@ #include "storage/lwlock.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" -/* - * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with - * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making - * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size - * is this: - */ -#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - /* * When we have to switch over to lossy storage, we use a data structure * with one bit per page, where all pages having the same number DIV @@ -67,7 +58,7 @@ * table, using identical data structures. (This is because the memory * management for hashtables doesn't easily/efficiently allow space to be * transferred easily from one hashtable to another.) Therefore it's best - * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE, or at least not + * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, or at least not * too different. But we also want PAGES_PER_CHUNK to be a power of 2 to * avoid expensive integer remainder operations. So, define it like this: */ @@ -79,7 +70,7 @@ #define BITNUM(x) ((x) % BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD) /* number of active words for an exact page: */ -#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) +#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) /* number of active words for a lossy chunk: */ #define WORDS_PER_CHUNK ((PAGES_PER_CHUNK - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) @@ -181,7 +172,7 @@ struct TBMIterator int spageptr; /* next spages index */ int schunkptr; /* next schunks index */ int schunkbit; /* next bit to check in current schunk */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* @@ -222,7 +213,7 @@ struct TBMSharedIterator PTEntryArray *ptbase; /* pagetable element array */ PTIterationArray *ptpages; /* sorted exact page index list */ PTIterationArray *ptchunks; /* sorted lossy page index list */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* Local function prototypes */ @@ -390,7 +381,7 @@ tbm_add_tuples(TIDBitmap *tbm, const ItemPointer tids, int ntids, bitnum; /* safety check to ensure we don't overrun bit array bounds */ - if (off < 1 || off > MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE) + if (off < 1 || off > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage) elog(ERROR, "tuple offset out of range: %u", off); /* @@ -692,12 +683,7 @@ tbm_begin_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm) Assert(tbm->iterating != TBM_ITERATING_SHARED); - /* - * Create the TBMIterator struct, with enough trailing space to serve the - * needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMIterator *) palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator)); iterator->tbm = tbm; /* @@ -1463,12 +1449,7 @@ tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa_area *dsa, dsa_pointer dp) TBMSharedIterator *iterator; TBMSharedIteratorState *istate; - /* - * Create the TBMSharedIterator struct, with enough trailing space to - * serve the needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator)); istate = (TBMSharedIteratorState *) dsa_get_address(dsa, dp); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h index 1945f0639b..432fae5296 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef TIDBITMAP_H #define TIDBITMAP_H +#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "storage/itemptr.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" @@ -41,9 +42,16 @@ typedef struct TBMIterateResult { BlockNumber blockno; /* page number containing tuples */ int ntuples; /* -1 indicates lossy result */ - bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ /* Note: recheck is always true if ntuples < 0 */ - OffsetNumber offsets[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; + bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ + + /* + * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with + * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making + * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size is + * this: + */ + OffsetNumber offsets[MaxHeapTuplesPerPage]; } TBMIterateResult; /* function prototypes in nodes/tidbitmap.c */ -- 2.40.1 --owzzsiozz6hgpp7e Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v11-0013-Separate-TBM-Shared-Iterator-and-TBMIterateResul.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v12 12/17] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size @ 2024-02-16 01:13 Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Melanie Plageman @ 2024-02-16 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw) TIDBitmap's TBMIterateResult had a flexible sized array of tuple offsets but the API always allocated MaxHeapTuplesPerPage OffsetNumbers. Creating a fixed-size aray of size MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more clear for the API user. --- src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 33 +++++++-------------------------- src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c index e8ab5d78fcc..1dc4c99bf99 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ #include <limits.h> -#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "common/hashfn.h" #include "common/int.h" #include "nodes/bitmapset.h" @@ -48,14 +47,6 @@ #include "storage/lwlock.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" -/* - * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with - * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making - * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size - * is this: - */ -#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - /* * When we have to switch over to lossy storage, we use a data structure * with one bit per page, where all pages having the same number DIV @@ -67,7 +58,7 @@ * table, using identical data structures. (This is because the memory * management for hashtables doesn't easily/efficiently allow space to be * transferred easily from one hashtable to another.) Therefore it's best - * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE, or at least not + * if PAGES_PER_CHUNK is the same as MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, or at least not * too different. But we also want PAGES_PER_CHUNK to be a power of 2 to * avoid expensive integer remainder operations. So, define it like this: */ @@ -79,7 +70,7 @@ #define BITNUM(x) ((x) % BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD) /* number of active words for an exact page: */ -#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) +#define WORDS_PER_PAGE ((MaxHeapTuplesPerPage - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) /* number of active words for a lossy chunk: */ #define WORDS_PER_CHUNK ((PAGES_PER_CHUNK - 1) / BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD + 1) @@ -181,7 +172,7 @@ struct TBMIterator int spageptr; /* next spages index */ int schunkptr; /* next schunks index */ int schunkbit; /* next bit to check in current schunk */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* @@ -222,7 +213,7 @@ struct TBMSharedIterator PTEntryArray *ptbase; /* pagetable element array */ PTIterationArray *ptpages; /* sorted exact page index list */ PTIterationArray *ptchunks; /* sorted lossy page index list */ - TBMIterateResult output; /* MUST BE LAST (because variable-size) */ + TBMIterateResult output; }; /* Local function prototypes */ @@ -390,7 +381,7 @@ tbm_add_tuples(TIDBitmap *tbm, const ItemPointer tids, int ntids, bitnum; /* safety check to ensure we don't overrun bit array bounds */ - if (off < 1 || off > MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE) + if (off < 1 || off > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage) elog(ERROR, "tuple offset out of range: %u", off); /* @@ -692,12 +683,7 @@ tbm_begin_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm) Assert(tbm->iterating != TBM_ITERATING_SHARED); - /* - * Create the TBMIterator struct, with enough trailing space to serve the - * needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMIterator *) palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = palloc(sizeof(TBMIterator)); iterator->tbm = tbm; /* @@ -1463,12 +1449,7 @@ tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa_area *dsa, dsa_pointer dp) TBMSharedIterator *iterator; TBMSharedIteratorState *istate; - /* - * Create the TBMSharedIterator struct, with enough trailing space to - * serve the needs of the TBMIterateResult sub-struct. - */ - iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator) + - MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE * sizeof(OffsetNumber)); + iterator = (TBMSharedIterator *) palloc0(sizeof(TBMSharedIterator)); istate = (TBMSharedIteratorState *) dsa_get_address(dsa, dp); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h index 1945f0639bf..432fae52962 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/tidbitmap.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef TIDBITMAP_H #define TIDBITMAP_H +#include "access/htup_details.h" #include "storage/itemptr.h" #include "utils/dsa.h" @@ -41,9 +42,16 @@ typedef struct TBMIterateResult { BlockNumber blockno; /* page number containing tuples */ int ntuples; /* -1 indicates lossy result */ - bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ /* Note: recheck is always true if ntuples < 0 */ - OffsetNumber offsets[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; + bool recheck; /* should the tuples be rechecked? */ + + /* + * The maximum number of tuples per page is not large (typically 256 with + * 8K pages, or 1024 with 32K pages). So there's not much point in making + * the per-page bitmaps variable size. We just legislate that the size is + * this: + */ + OffsetNumber offsets[MaxHeapTuplesPerPage]; } TBMIterateResult; /* function prototypes in nodes/tidbitmap.c */ -- 2.40.1 --6jpz2j246qmht4bt Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v12-0013-Separate-TBM-Shared-Iterator-and-TBMIterateResul.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-16 01:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-09-12 13:07 [PATCH 1/8] Pass all scan keys to BRIN consistent function at once Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> 2024-02-16 01:13 [PATCH v4 11/14] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 2024-02-16 01:13 [PATCH v5 11/14] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 2024-02-16 01:13 [PATCH v6 11/14] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 2024-02-16 01:13 [PATCH v3 10/13] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 2024-02-16 01:13 [PATCH v13 12/16] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 2024-02-16 01:13 [PATCH v7 10/13] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 2024-02-16 01:13 [PATCH v8 10/17] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 2024-02-16 01:13 [PATCH v9 11/17] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 2024-02-16 01:13 [PATCH v10 12/17] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 2024-02-16 01:13 [PATCH v11 12/17] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> 2024-02-16 01:13 [PATCH v12 12/17] Hard-code TBMIterateResult offsets array size Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox