agora inbox for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.orghelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. 387+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. Disallow asymmetric machinery for joining of two partitioned (or appended) relations because it could cause huge consumption of CPU and memory during reparameterization of NestLoop path. Change logic of the multilevel child relids adjustment, because this feature allows the optimizer to plan in new way. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 187 ++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c | 17 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 44 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 19 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 425 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 180 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 867 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index 6407ede12a..32618ebbd5 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 8b69870cf4..9453258f83 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1552,6 +1553,192 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs is impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_joinrelids; + Relids parent_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_joinrel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + + child_joinrelids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); + parent_relids = bms_union(append_path->path.parent->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + child_joinrelids, parent_relids); + + child_joinrel = find_join_rel(root, child_joinrelids); + if (!child_joinrel) + child_joinrel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + else + { + /* + * The join relation already exists. For example, it could happen if + * we join two plane tables with partitioned table(s). + * Populating this join with additional paths could push out some + * previously added paths which could be pointed in a subplans list + * of an higher level append. + * Of course, we could save such paths before generating new. But it + * can increase too much the number of paths in complex queries. It + * can be a task for future work. + */ + return NIL; + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_joinrel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_joinrel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_joinrel); + result = lappend(result, child_joinrel); + } + return result; +} + +static bool +is_asymmetric_join_feasible(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return false; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return false; + + /* Disallow recursive usage of asymmertic join machinery */ + if (root->join_rel_level == NULL) + return false; + + /* + * Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two append subplans. + * In the case of a parameterized NL join, a reparameterization procedure + * will lead to large memory allocations and a CPU consumption: + * each reparameterization will induce subpath duplication, creating new + * ParamPathInfo instance and increasing of ppilist up to number of + * partitions in the inner. Also, if we have many partitions, each bitmapset + * variable will be large and many leaks of such variable (caused by relid + * replacement) will highly increase memory consumption. + * So, we deny such paths for now. + */ + foreach(lc, inner_rel->pathlist) + { + if (IsA(lfirst(lc), AppendPath)) + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + /* + * Try this kind of paths if we allow complex partitionwise joins and we know + * we can build this join safely. + */ + if (!enable_partitionwise_join || + !is_asymmetric_join_feasible(root, outer_rel, inner_rel, jointype)) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. Asymmetric join isn't needed if the append node + * has only one child. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath) && + list_length(append_path->subpaths) > 1) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_FINALLY(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + } + PG_END_TRY(); + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + { + /* + * Add new append relation. We must choose cheapest paths after + * this operation because the pathlist possibly contains + * joinrels and appendrels that can be suboptimal. + */ + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + set_cheapest(joinrel); + } + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c index e50624c465..fccc0685d7 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c @@ -281,24 +281,29 @@ set_plan_references(PlannerInfo *root, Plan *plan) /* * Adjust RT indexes of AppendRelInfos and add to final appendrels list. - * We assume the AppendRelInfos were built during planning and don't need - * to be copied. + * The AppendRelInfos are copied, because as a part of a subplan they could + * be visited many times in the case of asymmetric join. */ foreach(lc, root->append_rel_list) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = lfirst_node(AppendRelInfo, lc); + AppendRelInfo *newappinfo; + + /* flat copy is enough since all valuable fields are scalars */ + newappinfo = (AppendRelInfo *) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); + memcpy(newappinfo, appinfo, sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); /* adjust RT indexes */ - appinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; - appinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; /* * Rather than adjust the translated_vars entries, just drop 'em. * Neither the executor nor EXPLAIN currently need that data. */ - appinfo->translated_vars = NIL; + newappinfo->translated_vars = NIL; - glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, appinfo); + glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, newappinfo); } /* Now fix the Plan tree */ diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..f4d12f76e1 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -490,12 +492,10 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, Relids top_parent_relids) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; - Bitmapset *parent_relids = NULL; + Relids parent_relids = NULL; int nappinfos; int cnt; - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); - appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of given child. */ @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -515,12 +520,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, node = adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, node, nappinfos, appinfos); pfree(appinfos); + pfree(parent_relids); return node; } /* - * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of + * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of * appinfos specifies the substitutions to be performed. */ Relids @@ -565,6 +571,7 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; Relids tmp_result = NULL; int cnt; @@ -579,13 +586,24 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + if (bms_is_subset(relids, normal_relids)) + { + /* Nothing to do. Parameters set points to plain relations only. */ + result = relids; + goto cleanup; + } + + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) { @@ -597,10 +615,11 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, result = adjust_child_relids(relids, nappinfos, appinfos); +cleanup: /* Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. */ - if (tmp_result) - bms_free(tmp_result); + bms_free(tmp_result); bms_free(parent_relids); + bms_free(normal_relids); pfree(appinfos); return result; @@ -715,11 +734,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +746,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index cedb3848dd..17e215b72d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4225,7 +4225,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index 47769cea45..ddf0f5a876 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -792,11 +792,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -854,8 +851,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); @@ -2036,9 +2036,8 @@ build_child_join_reltarget(PlannerInfo *root, { /* Build the targetlist */ childrel->reltarget->exprs = (List *) - adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, - (Node *) parentrel->reltarget->exprs, - nappinfos, appinfos); + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)parentrel->reltarget->exprs, + childrel->relids, parentrel->relids); /* Set the cost and width fields */ childrel->reltarget->cost.startup = parentrel->reltarget->cost.startup; diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index f1d111063c..a0106dc539 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..3eddd9bec3 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,431 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p0.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = prt6.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(13 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 4000 +(1 row) + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_4 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_5 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_7 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_8 +(32 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 2000 +(1 row) + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------ + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) +(35 rows) + +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + count +------- + 11000 +(1 row) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; +-- Check reparameterization code when an optimizer have to make two level relids +-- adjustment. +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; +-- Parameter have to be reparameterized by a plane relation. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop Left Join + -> Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 + -> Index Only Scan using big_x_idx on big + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) +(16 rows) + +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + x | y +---+--- +(0 rows) + +-- Parameters have to be reparameterized by plane and partitioned relations. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Nested Loop Left Join + -> Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 + -> Bitmap Heap Scan on big + Recheck Cond: ((x = (small.x)::numeric) OR (x = (part_l0.x)::numeric)) + -> BitmapOr + -> Bitmap Index Scan on big_x_idx + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) + -> Bitmap Index Scan on big_x_idx + Index Cond: (x = (part_l0.x)::numeric) +(22 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + count +------- + 0 +(1 row) + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..4d1dd5bec1 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,186 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; + +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; + +-- Check reparameterization code when an optimizer have to make two level relids +-- adjustment. + +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; + +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; + +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); + +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; + +-- Parameter have to be reparameterized by a plane relation. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + +-- Parameters have to be reparameterized by plane and partitioned relations. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.33.0 --------------9DCA5E9A07F91111D4169DAB-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. Disallow asymmetric machinery for joining of two partitioned (or appended) relations because it could cause huge consumption of CPU and memory during reparameterization of NestLoop path. Change logic of the multilevel child relids adjustment, because this feature allows the optimizer to plan in new way. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 187 +++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c | 17 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 51 ++- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 19 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 378 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 167 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 808 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index 6407ede12a..32618ebbd5 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 8b69870cf4..9453258f83 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1552,6 +1553,192 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs is impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_joinrelids; + Relids parent_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_joinrel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + + child_joinrelids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); + parent_relids = bms_union(append_path->path.parent->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + child_joinrelids, parent_relids); + + child_joinrel = find_join_rel(root, child_joinrelids); + if (!child_joinrel) + child_joinrel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + else + { + /* + * The join relation already exists. For example, it could happen if + * we join two plane tables with partitioned table(s). + * Populating this join with additional paths could push out some + * previously added paths which could be pointed in a subplans list + * of an higher level append. + * Of course, we could save such paths before generating new. But it + * can increase too much the number of paths in complex queries. It + * can be a task for future work. + */ + return NIL; + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_joinrel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_joinrel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_joinrel); + result = lappend(result, child_joinrel); + } + return result; +} + +static bool +is_asymmetric_join_feasible(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return false; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return false; + + /* Disallow recursive usage of asymmertic join machinery */ + if (root->join_rel_level == NULL) + return false; + + /* + * Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two append subplans. + * In the case of a parameterized NL join, a reparameterization procedure + * will lead to large memory allocations and a CPU consumption: + * each reparameterization will induce subpath duplication, creating new + * ParamPathInfo instance and increasing of ppilist up to number of + * partitions in the inner. Also, if we have many partitions, each bitmapset + * variable will be large and many leaks of such variable (caused by relid + * replacement) will highly increase memory consumption. + * So, we deny such paths for now. + */ + foreach(lc, inner_rel->pathlist) + { + if (IsA(lfirst(lc), AppendPath)) + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + /* + * Try this kind of paths if we allow complex partitionwise joins and we know + * we can build this join safely. + */ + if (!enable_partitionwise_join || + !is_asymmetric_join_feasible(root, outer_rel, inner_rel, jointype)) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. Asymmetric join isn't needed if the append node + * has only one child. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath) && + list_length(append_path->subpaths) > 1) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_FINALLY(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + } + PG_END_TRY(); + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + { + /* + * Add new append relation. We must choose cheapest paths after + * this operation because the pathlist possibly contains + * joinrels and appendrels that can be suboptimal. + */ + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + set_cheapest(joinrel); + } + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c index e50624c465..fccc0685d7 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c @@ -281,24 +281,29 @@ set_plan_references(PlannerInfo *root, Plan *plan) /* * Adjust RT indexes of AppendRelInfos and add to final appendrels list. - * We assume the AppendRelInfos were built during planning and don't need - * to be copied. + * The AppendRelInfos are copied, because as a part of a subplan they could + * be visited many times in the case of asymmetric join. */ foreach(lc, root->append_rel_list) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = lfirst_node(AppendRelInfo, lc); + AppendRelInfo *newappinfo; + + /* flat copy is enough since all valuable fields are scalars */ + newappinfo = (AppendRelInfo *) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); + memcpy(newappinfo, appinfo, sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); /* adjust RT indexes */ - appinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; - appinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; /* * Rather than adjust the translated_vars entries, just drop 'em. * Neither the executor nor EXPLAIN currently need that data. */ - appinfo->translated_vars = NIL; + newappinfo->translated_vars = NIL; - glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, appinfo); + glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, newappinfo); } /* Now fix the Plan tree */ diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..3ae25f3444 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -489,12 +491,10 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, Relids child_relids, Relids top_parent_relids) { - AppendRelInfo **appinfos; - Bitmapset *parent_relids = NULL; - int nappinfos; - int cnt; - - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); + AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + Relids parent_relids = NULL; + int nappinfos; + int cnt; appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -515,12 +520,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, node = adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, node, nappinfos, appinfos); pfree(appinfos); + pfree(parent_relids); return node; } /* - * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of + * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of * appinfos specifies the substitutions to be performed. */ Relids @@ -565,8 +571,9 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; - Relids tmp_result = NULL; + Relids tmp_result = relids; int cnt; /* @@ -579,12 +586,17 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + if (normal_relids) + bms_free(normal_relids); /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) @@ -592,13 +604,15 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, tmp_result = adjust_child_relids_multilevel(root, relids, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); - relids = tmp_result; } - result = adjust_child_relids(relids, nappinfos, appinfos); + result = adjust_child_relids(tmp_result, nappinfos, appinfos); - /* Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. */ - if (tmp_result) + /* + * Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. If recursive pass did't + * replace any relids, tmp_result point to the original set, not a copy. + */ + if (tmp_result != relids) bms_free(tmp_result); bms_free(parent_relids); pfree(appinfos); @@ -715,11 +729,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +741,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index cedb3848dd..17e215b72d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4225,7 +4225,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index 47769cea45..ddf0f5a876 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -792,11 +792,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -854,8 +851,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); @@ -2036,9 +2036,8 @@ build_child_join_reltarget(PlannerInfo *root, { /* Build the targetlist */ childrel->reltarget->exprs = (List *) - adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, - (Node *) parentrel->reltarget->exprs, - nappinfos, appinfos); + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)parentrel->reltarget->exprs, + childrel->relids, parentrel->relids); /* Set the cost and width fields */ childrel->reltarget->cost.startup = parentrel->reltarget->cost.startup; diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index f1d111063c..a0106dc539 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..327505676c 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,384 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p0.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = prt6.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(13 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 4000 +(1 row) + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_4 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_5 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_7 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_8 +(32 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 2000 +(1 row) + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------ + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) +(35 rows) + +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + count +------- + 11000 +(1 row) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; +-- Check reparameterization code when required_outer set contains relid of plain +-- relation entry, not 'other' entry. +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; +EXPLAIN +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.29..33230.19 rows=33 width=8) + -> Append (cost=0.00..33008.08 rows=67 width=8) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..16604.25 rows=33 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 (cost=0.00..78.19 rows=5019 width=4) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..3.75 rows=1 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=4) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..16399.75 rows=33 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 (cost=0.00..76.81 rows=4981 width=4) + -> Index Only Scan using big_x_idx on big (cost=0.29..3.31 rows=1 width=5) + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) +(16 rows) + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..364b3216f8 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,173 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; + +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; + +-- Check reparameterization code when required_outer set contains relid of plain +-- relation entry, not 'other' entry. + +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; + +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; + +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); + +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; + +EXPLAIN +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.25.1 --------------3592BFA68FFAC61CCE0AF115-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. This technique cause changes of 'reparameterize by child' machinery. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 151 ++++++++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 28 ++- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 14 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 209 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 99 +++++++++ 8 files changed, 509 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index e9b6968b1d..6ba6d32ae4 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 0dbe2ac726..6f900475bb 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1551,6 +1552,156 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs are impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_join_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_join_rel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nappinfos; + + child_join_relids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_join_relids, + &nappinfos); + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + nappinfos, appinfos); + pfree(appinfos); + + child_join_rel = find_join_rel(root, child_join_relids); + if (!child_join_rel) + { + child_join_rel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + if (!child_join_rel) + { + /* + * If can't build JOIN between inner relation and one of the outer + * partitions - return immediately. + */ + return NIL; + } + } + else + { + /* + * TODO: + * Can't imagine situation when join relation already exists. But in + * the 'partition_join' regression test it happens. + * It may be an indicator of possible problems. + */ + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_join_rel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_join_rel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_join_rel); + result = lappend(result, child_join_rel); + } + return result; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (!enable_partitionwise_join) + return; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * MEMO: We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. It is not correct right now, however, a hook + * on add_path() to give additional decision for path removel allows + * to retain this kind of AppendPath, regardless of its cost. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath)) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_CATCH(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + PG_RE_THROW(); + } + PG_END_TRY(); + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..be4624b619 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -494,8 +496,6 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos; int cnt; - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); - appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of given child. */ @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -565,6 +570,7 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; Relids tmp_result = NULL; int cnt; @@ -579,12 +585,17 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + if (normal_relids) + bms_free(normal_relids); /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) @@ -715,11 +726,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +738,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index b248b038e0..73cfb4748d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4209,7 +4209,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index e105a4d5f1..f98a82e725 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -790,11 +790,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -851,8 +848,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index 035d3e1206..d64aa37f80 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..2bc7ad70d9 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,215 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (1000.0 * random())::int, + (1000.0 * random())::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_1; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------ + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) +(34 rows) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = true; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..c206fd736a 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,105 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (1000.0 * random())::int, + (1000.0 * random())::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_1; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = true; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.25.1 --------------8EB2F9A6243C623F4024291E-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v52 06/10] Error out any process that would block at REPACK @ 2026-04-01 15:35 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-01 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw) Any process waiting on REPACK to release its lock would actually cause it to deadlock when it tries to upgrade its lock to AEL, losing all work done to that point. We avoid this by teaching the deadlock detector to raise an error when this condition is detected. --- src/backend/commands/repack.c | 60 ++++++++++---- src/backend/storage/lmgr/deadlock.c | 15 ++++ src/include/storage/proc.h | 6 +- src/test/modules/injection_points/Makefile | 1 + .../expected/repack_deadlock.out | 63 ++++++++++++++ src/test/modules/injection_points/meson.build | 1 + .../specs/repack_deadlock.spec | 83 +++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) create mode 100644 src/test/modules/injection_points/expected/repack_deadlock.out create mode 100644 src/test/modules/injection_points/specs/repack_deadlock.spec diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack.c b/src/backend/commands/repack.c index 03829892d57..d6e446d582d 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack.c @@ -279,6 +279,21 @@ ExecRepack(ParseState *pstate, RepackStmt *stmt, bool isTopLevel) /* Determine the lock mode to use. */ lockmode = RepackLockLevel((params.options & CLUOPT_CONCURRENT) != 0); + /* + * If in concurrent mode, set the PROC_IN_CONCURRENT_REPACK flag. This + * makes the deadlock checker cause anyone that would conflict with us to + * error out. It's important to set this flag ahead of actually locking + * the relation; it won't of course affect anyone until we do have a lock + * that others can conflict with. + */ + if ((params.options & CLUOPT_CONCURRENT) != 0) + { + LWLockAcquire(ProcArrayLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + MyProc->statusFlags |= PROC_IN_CONCURRENT_REPACK; + ProcGlobal->statusFlags[MyProc->pgxactoff] = MyProc->statusFlags; + LWLockRelease(ProcArrayLock); + } + /* * If a single relation is specified, process it and we're done ... unless * the relation is a partitioned table, in which case we fall through. @@ -479,11 +494,8 @@ RepackLockLevel(bool concurrent) * If indexOid is InvalidOid, the table will be rewritten in physical order * instead of index order. * - * Note that, in the concurrent case, the function releases the lock at some - * point, in order to get AccessExclusiveLock for the final steps (i.e. to - * swap the relation files). To make things simpler, the caller should expect - * OldHeap to be closed on return, regardless CLUOPT_CONCURRENT. (The - * AccessExclusiveLock is kept till the end of the transaction.) + * On return, OldHeap is closed but locked with AccessExclusiveLock - the lock + * will be released at end of the transaction. * * 'cmd' indicates which command is being executed, to be used for error * messages. @@ -515,10 +527,12 @@ cluster_rel(RepackCommand cmd, Relation OldHeap, Oid indexOid, /* * Make sure we're not in a transaction block. * - * The reason is that repack_setup_logical_decoding() could deadlock - * if there's an XID already assigned. It would be possible to run in - * a transaction block if we had no XID, but this restriction is - * simpler for users to understand and we don't lose anything. + * The reason is that repack_setup_logical_decoding() could wait + * indefinitely for our XID to complete. (The deadlock detector would + * not recognize it because we'd be waiting for ourselves, i.e. no + * real lock conflict.) It would be possible to run in a transaction + * block if we had no XID, but this restriction is simpler for users + * to understand and we don't lose anything. */ PreventInTransactionBlock(isTopLevel, "REPACK (CONCURRENTLY)"); @@ -1001,10 +1015,8 @@ rebuild_relation(Relation OldHeap, Relation index, bool verbose, * Note that the worker has to wait for all transactions with XID * already assigned to finish. If some of those transactions is * waiting for a lock conflicting with ShareUpdateExclusiveLock on our - * table (e.g. it runs CREATE INDEX), we can end up in a deadlock. - * Not sure this risk is worth unlocking/locking the table (and its - * clustering index) and checking again if it's still eligible for - * REPACK CONCURRENTLY. + * table (e.g. it runs CREATE INDEX), it should encounter ERROR in the + * deadlock checking code. */ start_repack_decoding_worker(tableOid); @@ -3093,7 +3105,19 @@ rebuild_relation_finish_concurrent(Relation NewHeap, Relation OldHeap, LockRelationOid(OldHeap->rd_rel->reltoastrelid, AccessExclusiveLock); /* - * Tuples and pages of the old heap will be gone, but the heap will stay. + * Now that we have all access-exclusive locks on all relations, we no + * longer want other processes to error out when trying to acquire a + * conflicting lock. Therefore, unset our flag. + */ + LWLockAcquire(ProcArrayLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); + MyProc->statusFlags &= ~PROC_IN_CONCURRENT_REPACK; + ProcGlobal->statusFlags[MyProc->pgxactoff] = MyProc->statusFlags; + LWLockRelease(ProcArrayLock); + + /* + * Tuples and pages of the old heap will be gone, but the heap itself will + * stay. In order for predicate locks to continue to work, convert them + * to relation-level locks. We do this both for table and indexes. */ TransferPredicateLocksToHeapRelation(OldHeap); foreach_ptr(RelationData, index, indexrels) @@ -3366,9 +3390,11 @@ start_repack_decoding_worker(Oid relid) /* * The decoding setup must be done before the caller can have XID assigned - * for any reason, otherwise the worker might end up in a deadlock, - * waiting for the caller's transaction to end. Therefore wait here until - * the worker indicates that it has the logical decoding initialized. + * for any reason, otherwise the worker might end up waiting for the + * caller's transaction to end. (Deadlock detector does not consider this + * a conflict because the worker is in the same locking group as the + * backend that launched it.) Therefore wait here until the worker + * indicates that it has the logical decoding initialized. */ ConditionVariablePrepareToSleep(&shared->cv); for (;;) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/deadlock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/deadlock.c index b8962d875b6..c20ac682b0d 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/deadlock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/deadlock.c @@ -620,6 +620,21 @@ FindLockCycleRecurseMember(PGPROC *checkProc, proc->statusFlags & PROC_IS_AUTOVACUUM) blocking_autovacuum_proc = proc; + /* + * Similarly, if we note that we're blocked by some + * process running REPACK (CONCURRENTLY), just fail. That + * process is going to upgrade its lock at some point, and + * it would be inappropriate for any other process to + * cause that to fail. + */ + if (checkProc == MyProc && + proc->statusFlags & PROC_IN_CONCURRENT_REPACK) + ereport(ERROR, + errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_IN_USE), + errmsg("could not wait for concurrent REPACK"), + errdetail("Process %d waits for REPACK running on process %d", + MyProc->pid, proc->pid)); + /* We're done looking at this proclock */ break; } diff --git a/src/include/storage/proc.h b/src/include/storage/proc.h index 1dad125706e..8ad9718f3d6 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/proc.h +++ b/src/include/storage/proc.h @@ -69,10 +69,12 @@ struct XidCache #define PROC_AFFECTS_ALL_HORIZONS 0x20 /* this proc's xmin must be * included in vacuum horizons * in all databases */ +#define PROC_IN_CONCURRENT_REPACK 0x40 /* REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) */ -/* flags reset at EOXact */ +/* flags reset at EOXact. A bit of a misnomer ... */ #define PROC_VACUUM_STATE_MASK \ - (PROC_IN_VACUUM | PROC_IN_SAFE_IC | PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND) + (PROC_IN_VACUUM | PROC_IN_SAFE_IC | PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND | \ + PROC_IN_CONCURRENT_REPACK) /* * Xmin-related flags. Make sure any flags that affect how the process' Xmin diff --git a/src/test/modules/injection_points/Makefile b/src/test/modules/injection_points/Makefile index 2cd7d87c533..f7663859fe2 100644 --- a/src/test/modules/injection_points/Makefile +++ b/src/test/modules/injection_points/Makefile @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ REGRESS_OPTS = --dlpath=$(top_builddir)/src/test/regress ISOLATION = basic \ inplace \ repack \ + repack_deadlock \ repack_toast \ syscache-update-pruned \ heap_lock_update diff --git a/src/test/modules/injection_points/expected/repack_deadlock.out b/src/test/modules/injection_points/expected/repack_deadlock.out new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a86e4767536 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/modules/injection_points/expected/repack_deadlock.out @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +Parsed test spec with 2 sessions + +starting permutation: wait_before_lock add_column wakeup_before_lock check1 +injection_points_attach +----------------------- + +(1 row) + +step wait_before_lock: + REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) repack_deadlock USING INDEX repack_deadlock_pkey; + <waiting ...> +step add_column: + alter table repack_deadlock add column noise text; + <waiting ...> +step add_column: <... completed> +ERROR: could not wait for concurrent REPACK +step wakeup_before_lock: + SELECT injection_points_wakeup('repack-concurrently-before-lock'); + +injection_points_wakeup +----------------------- + +(1 row) + +step wait_before_lock: <... completed> +step check1: + INSERT INTO relfilenodes(node) + SELECT relfilenode FROM pg_class WHERE relname='repack_deadlock'; + + SELECT count(DISTINCT node) FROM relfilenodes; + + SELECT i, j FROM repack_deadlock ORDER BY i, j; + + INSERT INTO data_s1(i, j) + SELECT i, j FROM repack_deadlock; + + SELECT count(*) + FROM data_s1 d1 FULL JOIN data_s2 d2 USING (i, j) + WHERE d1.i ISNULL OR d2.i ISNULL; + +count +----- + 1 +(1 row) + +i|j +-+- +1|1 +2|2 +3|3 +4|4 +(4 rows) + +count +----- + 4 +(1 row) + +injection_points_detach +----------------------- + +(1 row) + diff --git a/src/test/modules/injection_points/meson.build b/src/test/modules/injection_points/meson.build index a414abb924b..1cd88d6db65 100644 --- a/src/test/modules/injection_points/meson.build +++ b/src/test/modules/injection_points/meson.build @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ tests += { 'basic', 'inplace', 'repack', + 'repack_deadlock', 'repack_toast', 'syscache-update-pruned', 'heap_lock_update', diff --git a/src/test/modules/injection_points/specs/repack_deadlock.spec b/src/test/modules/injection_points/specs/repack_deadlock.spec new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9d23a6588c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/modules/injection_points/specs/repack_deadlock.spec @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +# Test REPACK with a concurrent transaction that would cause a deadlock +setup +{ + CREATE EXTENSION injection_points; + + CREATE TABLE repack_deadlock(i int PRIMARY KEY, j int); + INSERT INTO repack_deadlock(i, j) VALUES (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (4, 4); + + CREATE TABLE relfilenodes(node oid); + + CREATE TABLE data_s1(i int, j int); + CREATE TABLE data_s2(i int, j int); +} + +teardown +{ + DROP TABLE repack_deadlock; + DROP EXTENSION injection_points; + + DROP TABLE relfilenodes; + DROP TABLE data_s1; + DROP TABLE data_s2; +} + +session s1 +setup +{ + SELECT injection_points_set_local(); + SELECT injection_points_attach('repack-concurrently-before-lock', 'wait'); +} +# Perform the initial load and wait for s2 to do some data changes. +step wait_before_lock +{ + REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) repack_deadlock USING INDEX repack_deadlock_pkey; +} +# Check the table from the perspective of s1. +# +# Besides the contents, we also check that relfilenode has changed. + +# Have each session write the contents into a table and use FULL JOIN to check +# if the outputs are identical. +step check1 +{ + INSERT INTO relfilenodes(node) + SELECT relfilenode FROM pg_class WHERE relname='repack_deadlock'; + + SELECT count(DISTINCT node) FROM relfilenodes; + + SELECT i, j FROM repack_deadlock ORDER BY i, j; + + INSERT INTO data_s1(i, j) + SELECT i, j FROM repack_deadlock; + + SELECT count(*) + FROM data_s1 d1 FULL JOIN data_s2 d2 USING (i, j) + WHERE d1.i ISNULL OR d2.i ISNULL; +} +teardown +{ + SELECT injection_points_detach('repack-concurrently-before-lock'); +} + +session s2 +# Change the existing data. UPDATE changes both key and non-key columns. Also +# update one row twice to test whether tuple version generated by this session +# can be found. +step add_column +{ + alter table repack_deadlock add column noise text; +} + +step wakeup_before_lock +{ + SELECT injection_points_wakeup('repack-concurrently-before-lock'); +} + +# Test if data changes introduced while one session is performing REPACK +# CONCURRENTLY find their way into the table. +permutation + wait_before_lock + add_column + wakeup_before_lock + check1 -- 2.47.3 --gp2pyozrd5pweboh Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v52-0007-Check-for-transaction-block-early-in-ExecRepack.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 387+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 387+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-20 07:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 387+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2026-04-01 15:35 [PATCH v52 06/10] Error out any process that would block at REPACK Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox