agora inbox for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.orghelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. 327+ messages / 3 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. Disallow asymmetric machinery for joining of two partitioned (or appended) relations because it could cause huge consumption of CPU and memory during reparameterization of NestLoop path. Change logic of the multilevel child relids adjustment, because this feature allows the optimizer to plan in new way. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 187 ++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c | 17 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 44 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 19 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 425 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 180 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 867 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index 6407ede12a..32618ebbd5 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 8b69870cf4..9453258f83 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1552,6 +1553,192 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs is impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_joinrelids; + Relids parent_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_joinrel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + + child_joinrelids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); + parent_relids = bms_union(append_path->path.parent->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + child_joinrelids, parent_relids); + + child_joinrel = find_join_rel(root, child_joinrelids); + if (!child_joinrel) + child_joinrel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + else + { + /* + * The join relation already exists. For example, it could happen if + * we join two plane tables with partitioned table(s). + * Populating this join with additional paths could push out some + * previously added paths which could be pointed in a subplans list + * of an higher level append. + * Of course, we could save such paths before generating new. But it + * can increase too much the number of paths in complex queries. It + * can be a task for future work. + */ + return NIL; + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_joinrel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_joinrel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_joinrel); + result = lappend(result, child_joinrel); + } + return result; +} + +static bool +is_asymmetric_join_feasible(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return false; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return false; + + /* Disallow recursive usage of asymmertic join machinery */ + if (root->join_rel_level == NULL) + return false; + + /* + * Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two append subplans. + * In the case of a parameterized NL join, a reparameterization procedure + * will lead to large memory allocations and a CPU consumption: + * each reparameterization will induce subpath duplication, creating new + * ParamPathInfo instance and increasing of ppilist up to number of + * partitions in the inner. Also, if we have many partitions, each bitmapset + * variable will be large and many leaks of such variable (caused by relid + * replacement) will highly increase memory consumption. + * So, we deny such paths for now. + */ + foreach(lc, inner_rel->pathlist) + { + if (IsA(lfirst(lc), AppendPath)) + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + /* + * Try this kind of paths if we allow complex partitionwise joins and we know + * we can build this join safely. + */ + if (!enable_partitionwise_join || + !is_asymmetric_join_feasible(root, outer_rel, inner_rel, jointype)) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. Asymmetric join isn't needed if the append node + * has only one child. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath) && + list_length(append_path->subpaths) > 1) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_FINALLY(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + } + PG_END_TRY(); + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + { + /* + * Add new append relation. We must choose cheapest paths after + * this operation because the pathlist possibly contains + * joinrels and appendrels that can be suboptimal. + */ + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + set_cheapest(joinrel); + } + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c index e50624c465..fccc0685d7 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c @@ -281,24 +281,29 @@ set_plan_references(PlannerInfo *root, Plan *plan) /* * Adjust RT indexes of AppendRelInfos and add to final appendrels list. - * We assume the AppendRelInfos were built during planning and don't need - * to be copied. + * The AppendRelInfos are copied, because as a part of a subplan they could + * be visited many times in the case of asymmetric join. */ foreach(lc, root->append_rel_list) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = lfirst_node(AppendRelInfo, lc); + AppendRelInfo *newappinfo; + + /* flat copy is enough since all valuable fields are scalars */ + newappinfo = (AppendRelInfo *) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); + memcpy(newappinfo, appinfo, sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); /* adjust RT indexes */ - appinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; - appinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; /* * Rather than adjust the translated_vars entries, just drop 'em. * Neither the executor nor EXPLAIN currently need that data. */ - appinfo->translated_vars = NIL; + newappinfo->translated_vars = NIL; - glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, appinfo); + glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, newappinfo); } /* Now fix the Plan tree */ diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..f4d12f76e1 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -490,12 +492,10 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, Relids top_parent_relids) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; - Bitmapset *parent_relids = NULL; + Relids parent_relids = NULL; int nappinfos; int cnt; - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); - appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of given child. */ @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -515,12 +520,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, node = adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, node, nappinfos, appinfos); pfree(appinfos); + pfree(parent_relids); return node; } /* - * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of + * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of * appinfos specifies the substitutions to be performed. */ Relids @@ -565,6 +571,7 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; Relids tmp_result = NULL; int cnt; @@ -579,13 +586,24 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + if (bms_is_subset(relids, normal_relids)) + { + /* Nothing to do. Parameters set points to plain relations only. */ + result = relids; + goto cleanup; + } + + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) { @@ -597,10 +615,11 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, result = adjust_child_relids(relids, nappinfos, appinfos); +cleanup: /* Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. */ - if (tmp_result) - bms_free(tmp_result); + bms_free(tmp_result); bms_free(parent_relids); + bms_free(normal_relids); pfree(appinfos); return result; @@ -715,11 +734,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +746,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index cedb3848dd..17e215b72d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4225,7 +4225,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index 47769cea45..ddf0f5a876 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -792,11 +792,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -854,8 +851,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); @@ -2036,9 +2036,8 @@ build_child_join_reltarget(PlannerInfo *root, { /* Build the targetlist */ childrel->reltarget->exprs = (List *) - adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, - (Node *) parentrel->reltarget->exprs, - nappinfos, appinfos); + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)parentrel->reltarget->exprs, + childrel->relids, parentrel->relids); /* Set the cost and width fields */ childrel->reltarget->cost.startup = parentrel->reltarget->cost.startup; diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index f1d111063c..a0106dc539 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..3eddd9bec3 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,431 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p0.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = prt6.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(13 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 4000 +(1 row) + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_4 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_5 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_7 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_8 +(32 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 2000 +(1 row) + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------ + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) +(35 rows) + +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + count +------- + 11000 +(1 row) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; +-- Check reparameterization code when an optimizer have to make two level relids +-- adjustment. +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; +-- Parameter have to be reparameterized by a plane relation. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop Left Join + -> Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 + -> Index Only Scan using big_x_idx on big + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) +(16 rows) + +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + x | y +---+--- +(0 rows) + +-- Parameters have to be reparameterized by plane and partitioned relations. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Nested Loop Left Join + -> Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 + -> Bitmap Heap Scan on big + Recheck Cond: ((x = (small.x)::numeric) OR (x = (part_l0.x)::numeric)) + -> BitmapOr + -> Bitmap Index Scan on big_x_idx + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) + -> Bitmap Index Scan on big_x_idx + Index Cond: (x = (part_l0.x)::numeric) +(22 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + count +------- + 0 +(1 row) + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..4d1dd5bec1 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,186 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; + +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; + +-- Check reparameterization code when an optimizer have to make two level relids +-- adjustment. + +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; + +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; + +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); + +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; + +-- Parameter have to be reparameterized by a plane relation. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + +-- Parameters have to be reparameterized by plane and partitioned relations. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.33.0 --------------9DCA5E9A07F91111D4169DAB-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. This technique cause changes of 'reparameterize by child' machinery. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 151 ++++++++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 28 ++- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 14 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 209 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 99 +++++++++ 8 files changed, 509 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index e9b6968b1d..6ba6d32ae4 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 0dbe2ac726..6f900475bb 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1551,6 +1552,156 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs are impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_join_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_join_rel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nappinfos; + + child_join_relids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_join_relids, + &nappinfos); + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + nappinfos, appinfos); + pfree(appinfos); + + child_join_rel = find_join_rel(root, child_join_relids); + if (!child_join_rel) + { + child_join_rel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + if (!child_join_rel) + { + /* + * If can't build JOIN between inner relation and one of the outer + * partitions - return immediately. + */ + return NIL; + } + } + else + { + /* + * TODO: + * Can't imagine situation when join relation already exists. But in + * the 'partition_join' regression test it happens. + * It may be an indicator of possible problems. + */ + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_join_rel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_join_rel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_join_rel); + result = lappend(result, child_join_rel); + } + return result; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (!enable_partitionwise_join) + return; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * MEMO: We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. It is not correct right now, however, a hook + * on add_path() to give additional decision for path removel allows + * to retain this kind of AppendPath, regardless of its cost. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath)) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_CATCH(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + PG_RE_THROW(); + } + PG_END_TRY(); + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..be4624b619 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -494,8 +496,6 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos; int cnt; - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); - appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of given child. */ @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -565,6 +570,7 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; Relids tmp_result = NULL; int cnt; @@ -579,12 +585,17 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + if (normal_relids) + bms_free(normal_relids); /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) @@ -715,11 +726,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +738,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index b248b038e0..73cfb4748d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4209,7 +4209,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index e105a4d5f1..f98a82e725 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -790,11 +790,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -851,8 +848,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index 035d3e1206..d64aa37f80 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..2bc7ad70d9 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,215 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (1000.0 * random())::int, + (1000.0 * random())::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_1; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------ + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) +(34 rows) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = true; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..c206fd736a 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,105 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (1000.0 * random())::int, + (1000.0 * random())::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_1; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = true; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.25.1 --------------8EB2F9A6243C623F4024291E-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. Disallow asymmetric machinery for joining of two partitioned (or appended) relations because it could cause huge consumption of CPU and memory during reparameterization of NestLoop path. Change logic of the multilevel child relids adjustment, because this feature allows the optimizer to plan in new way. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 187 +++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c | 17 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 51 ++- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 19 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 378 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 167 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 808 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index 6407ede12a..32618ebbd5 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 8b69870cf4..9453258f83 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1552,6 +1553,192 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs is impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_joinrelids; + Relids parent_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_joinrel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + + child_joinrelids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); + parent_relids = bms_union(append_path->path.parent->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + child_joinrelids, parent_relids); + + child_joinrel = find_join_rel(root, child_joinrelids); + if (!child_joinrel) + child_joinrel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + else + { + /* + * The join relation already exists. For example, it could happen if + * we join two plane tables with partitioned table(s). + * Populating this join with additional paths could push out some + * previously added paths which could be pointed in a subplans list + * of an higher level append. + * Of course, we could save such paths before generating new. But it + * can increase too much the number of paths in complex queries. It + * can be a task for future work. + */ + return NIL; + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_joinrel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_joinrel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_joinrel); + result = lappend(result, child_joinrel); + } + return result; +} + +static bool +is_asymmetric_join_feasible(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return false; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return false; + + /* Disallow recursive usage of asymmertic join machinery */ + if (root->join_rel_level == NULL) + return false; + + /* + * Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two append subplans. + * In the case of a parameterized NL join, a reparameterization procedure + * will lead to large memory allocations and a CPU consumption: + * each reparameterization will induce subpath duplication, creating new + * ParamPathInfo instance and increasing of ppilist up to number of + * partitions in the inner. Also, if we have many partitions, each bitmapset + * variable will be large and many leaks of such variable (caused by relid + * replacement) will highly increase memory consumption. + * So, we deny such paths for now. + */ + foreach(lc, inner_rel->pathlist) + { + if (IsA(lfirst(lc), AppendPath)) + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + /* + * Try this kind of paths if we allow complex partitionwise joins and we know + * we can build this join safely. + */ + if (!enable_partitionwise_join || + !is_asymmetric_join_feasible(root, outer_rel, inner_rel, jointype)) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. Asymmetric join isn't needed if the append node + * has only one child. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath) && + list_length(append_path->subpaths) > 1) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_FINALLY(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + } + PG_END_TRY(); + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + { + /* + * Add new append relation. We must choose cheapest paths after + * this operation because the pathlist possibly contains + * joinrels and appendrels that can be suboptimal. + */ + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + set_cheapest(joinrel); + } + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c index e50624c465..fccc0685d7 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c @@ -281,24 +281,29 @@ set_plan_references(PlannerInfo *root, Plan *plan) /* * Adjust RT indexes of AppendRelInfos and add to final appendrels list. - * We assume the AppendRelInfos were built during planning and don't need - * to be copied. + * The AppendRelInfos are copied, because as a part of a subplan they could + * be visited many times in the case of asymmetric join. */ foreach(lc, root->append_rel_list) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = lfirst_node(AppendRelInfo, lc); + AppendRelInfo *newappinfo; + + /* flat copy is enough since all valuable fields are scalars */ + newappinfo = (AppendRelInfo *) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); + memcpy(newappinfo, appinfo, sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); /* adjust RT indexes */ - appinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; - appinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; /* * Rather than adjust the translated_vars entries, just drop 'em. * Neither the executor nor EXPLAIN currently need that data. */ - appinfo->translated_vars = NIL; + newappinfo->translated_vars = NIL; - glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, appinfo); + glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, newappinfo); } /* Now fix the Plan tree */ diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..3ae25f3444 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -489,12 +491,10 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, Relids child_relids, Relids top_parent_relids) { - AppendRelInfo **appinfos; - Bitmapset *parent_relids = NULL; - int nappinfos; - int cnt; - - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); + AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + Relids parent_relids = NULL; + int nappinfos; + int cnt; appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -515,12 +520,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, node = adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, node, nappinfos, appinfos); pfree(appinfos); + pfree(parent_relids); return node; } /* - * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of + * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of * appinfos specifies the substitutions to be performed. */ Relids @@ -565,8 +571,9 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; - Relids tmp_result = NULL; + Relids tmp_result = relids; int cnt; /* @@ -579,12 +586,17 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + if (normal_relids) + bms_free(normal_relids); /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) @@ -592,13 +604,15 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, tmp_result = adjust_child_relids_multilevel(root, relids, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); - relids = tmp_result; } - result = adjust_child_relids(relids, nappinfos, appinfos); + result = adjust_child_relids(tmp_result, nappinfos, appinfos); - /* Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. */ - if (tmp_result) + /* + * Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. If recursive pass did't + * replace any relids, tmp_result point to the original set, not a copy. + */ + if (tmp_result != relids) bms_free(tmp_result); bms_free(parent_relids); pfree(appinfos); @@ -715,11 +729,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +741,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index cedb3848dd..17e215b72d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4225,7 +4225,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index 47769cea45..ddf0f5a876 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -792,11 +792,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -854,8 +851,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); @@ -2036,9 +2036,8 @@ build_child_join_reltarget(PlannerInfo *root, { /* Build the targetlist */ childrel->reltarget->exprs = (List *) - adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, - (Node *) parentrel->reltarget->exprs, - nappinfos, appinfos); + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)parentrel->reltarget->exprs, + childrel->relids, parentrel->relids); /* Set the cost and width fields */ childrel->reltarget->cost.startup = parentrel->reltarget->cost.startup; diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index f1d111063c..a0106dc539 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..327505676c 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,384 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p0.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = prt6.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(13 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 4000 +(1 row) + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_4 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_5 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_7 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_8 +(32 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 2000 +(1 row) + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------ + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) +(35 rows) + +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + count +------- + 11000 +(1 row) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; +-- Check reparameterization code when required_outer set contains relid of plain +-- relation entry, not 'other' entry. +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; +EXPLAIN +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.29..33230.19 rows=33 width=8) + -> Append (cost=0.00..33008.08 rows=67 width=8) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..16604.25 rows=33 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 (cost=0.00..78.19 rows=5019 width=4) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..3.75 rows=1 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=4) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..16399.75 rows=33 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 (cost=0.00..76.81 rows=4981 width=4) + -> Index Only Scan using big_x_idx on big (cost=0.29..3.31 rows=1 width=5) + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) +(16 rows) + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..364b3216f8 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,173 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; + +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; + +-- Check reparameterization code when required_outer set contains relid of plain +-- relation entry, not 'other' entry. + +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; + +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; + +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); + +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; + +EXPLAIN +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.25.1 --------------3592BFA68FFAC61CCE0AF115-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/1] tell client when prepared statements are deallocated @ 2026-06-02 22:01 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-06-02 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw) Add a PrepStmtDeallocated protocol message, negotiated via the _pq_.report_stmt_dealloc extension, that tells clients when a named prepared statement is dropped by DEALLOCATE, DISCARD, or a Close message. libpq dispatches the message to callbacks registered with PQaddPrepStmtDeallocCallback, and PQprepStmtDeallocSupported reports whether the server accepted the extension. --- doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml | 74 +++++++++++++++++++ doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml | 62 +++++++++++++++- src/backend/commands/prepare.c | 29 ++++++++ src/backend/tcop/backend_startup.c | 13 ++-- src/include/libpq/libpq-be.h | 3 + src/include/libpq/protocol.h | 1 + src/interfaces/libpq/exports.txt | 2 + src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c | 58 +++++++++++++++ src/interfaces/libpq/fe-protocol3.c | 46 ++++++++++++ src/interfaces/libpq/fe-trace.c | 10 +++ src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-fe.h | 11 +++ src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-int.h | 6 ++ .../libpq_pipeline/traces/prepared.trace | 1 + 13 files changed, 309 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml index 7d3c3bb66d8..8bc51fffad0 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml @@ -7253,6 +7253,80 @@ typedef struct pgNotify </sect1> + <sect1 id="libpq-prepstmt-dealloc"> + <title>Prepared Statement Deallocation Notifications</title> + + <indexterm zone="libpq-prepstmt-dealloc"> + <primary>prepared statement deallocation</primary> + <secondary>in libpq</secondary> + </indexterm> + + <para> + The server can notify the client whenever a named prepared statement is + deallocated by + <link linkend="sql-deallocate"><command>DEALLOCATE</command></link>, + <link linkend="sql-discard"><command>DISCARD</command></link>, + <xref linkend="libpq-PQclosePrepared"/>, or + <xref linkend="libpq-PQsendClosePrepared"/>. This is useful when multiple + layers of client code share a connection and one drops a statement another + prepared. This behavior is negotiated through the + <link linkend="protocol-extensions"><literal>_pq_.report_stmt_dealloc</literal></link> + protocol extension, which is only available on servers running + <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> 20 and later. + <application>libpq</application> always requests this protocol extension. + </para> + + <para> + Notifications are delivered to callbacks registered with + <function>PQaddPrepStmtDeallocCallback</function>. + + <variablelist> + <varlistentry id="libpq-PQaddPrepStmtDeallocCallback"> + <term><function>PQaddPrepStmtDeallocCallback</function><indexterm><primary>PQaddPrepStmtDeallocCallback</primary></indexterm></term> + <listitem> + <para> + Registers a callback to be invoked immediately upon receiving a prepared + statement deallocation notification. The value of + <parameter>arg</parameter> is passed unaltered to the callback. The + <parameter>name</parameter> argument will contain the name of the + deallocated prepared statement, or an empty string if all were + deallocated. Callbacks run while <application>libpq</application> + processes incoming data, so they must not call any + <application>libpq</application> functions on the same + <parameter>conn</parameter>, and they must not assume that + <parameter>name</parameter> survives after returning (copy it if it is + needed later). Returns <literal>1</literal> on success or + <literal>0</literal> if the callback could not be registered (e.g., due + to running out of memory). + +<synopsis> +typedef void (*PQprepStmtDeallocCallback) (PGconn *conn, void *arg, const char *name); + +int PQaddPrepStmtDeallocCallback(PGconn *conn, PQprepStmtDeallocCallback cb, void *arg); +</synopsis> + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + + <varlistentry id="libpq-PQprepStmtDeallocSupported"> + <term><function>PQprepStmtDeallocSupported</function><indexterm><primary>PQprepStmtDeallocSupported</primary></indexterm></term> + <listitem> + <para> + Returns <literal>1</literal> if the server accepted the + <literal>_pq_.report_stmt_dealloc</literal> protocol extension. + Otherwise, returns <literal>0</literal> to indicate that no prepared + statement deallocation notifications will be sent. + +<synopsis> +int PQprepStmtDeallocSupported(PGconn *conn); +</synopsis> + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + </variablelist> + </para> + </sect1> + <sect1 id="libpq-copy"> <title>Functions Associated with the <command>COPY</command> Command</title> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml index 49f81676712..c881486d707 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml @@ -346,8 +346,15 @@ <tbody> <row> - <entry namest="last" align="center" valign="middle"> - <emphasis>(No supported protocol extensions are currently defined.)</emphasis> + <entry><literal>_pq_.report_stmt_dealloc</literal></entry> + <entry><emphasis>none</emphasis></entry> + <entry>PostgreSQL 20 and later</entry> + <entry>When negotiated, the server sends a + <link linkend="protocol-message-formats-PrepStmtDeallocated">PrepStmtDeallocated</link> + message whenever a named prepared statement is deallocated by + <link linkend="sql-deallocate"><command>DEALLOCATE</command></link>, + <link linkend="sql-discard"><command>DISCARD</command></link>, or a + <link linkend="protocol-message-formats-Close">Close</link> message. </entry> </row> </tbody> @@ -1587,6 +1594,20 @@ SELCT 1/0;<!-- this typo is intentional --> point in the protocol. </para> </note> + + <para> + If the client requested the + <link linkend="protocol-extensions"><literal>_pq_.report_stmt_dealloc</literal></link> + protocol extension, the backend sends a PrepStmtDeallocated message + whenever a named prepared statement is deallocated by + <link linkend="sql-deallocate"><command>DEALLOCATE</command></link>, + <link linkend="sql-discard"><command>DISCARD</command></link>, or a + <link linkend="protocol-message-formats-Close">Close</link> message. This + alerts the client that a statement it prepared is gone (e.g., if another + layer of the client stack dropped it) and that it must be re-prepared + before reuse. The message carries the deallocated statement's name, or an + empty string to mean that all prepared statements were deallocated. + </para> </sect2> <sect2 id="protocol-flow-canceling-requests"> @@ -5873,6 +5894,43 @@ psql "dbname=postgres replication=database" -c "IDENTIFY_SYSTEM;" </listitem> </varlistentry> + <varlistentry id="protocol-message-formats-PrepStmtDeallocated"> + <term>PrepStmtDeallocated (B)</term> + <listitem> + <variablelist> + <varlistentry> + <term>Byte1('i')</term> + <listitem> + <para> + Identifies the message as a prepared statement deallocation + notification. This is sent only if the client requested the + <literal>_pq_.report_stmt_dealloc</literal> protocol extension. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + + <varlistentry> + <term>Int32</term> + <listitem> + <para> + Length of message contents in bytes, including self. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + + <varlistentry> + <term>String</term> + <listitem> + <para> + The name of the deallocated prepared statement. An empty string + indicates that all prepared statements were deallocated. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + </variablelist> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + <varlistentry id="protocol-message-formats-Query"> <term>Query (F)</term> <listitem> diff --git a/src/backend/commands/prepare.c b/src/backend/commands/prepare.c index 876aad2100a..2c3e881cf42 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/prepare.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/prepare.c @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ #include "commands/explain_state.h" #include "commands/prepare.h" #include "funcapi.h" +#include "libpq/libpq.h" +#include "libpq/pqformat.h" +#include "miscadmin.h" #include "nodes/nodeFuncs.h" #include "parser/parse_coerce.h" #include "parser/parse_collate.h" @@ -512,6 +515,26 @@ DeallocateQuery(DeallocateStmt *stmt) DropAllPreparedStatements(); } +/* + * Tell the client that a prepared statement has been deallocated (an empty + * string means all of them). Only sent to clients that requested the + * _pq_.report_stmt_dealloc protocol extension. + */ +static void +SendStmtDeallocMsg(const char *name) +{ + StringInfoData buf; + + if (whereToSendOutput != DestRemote) + return; + if (!MyProcPort || !MyProcPort->report_stmt_dealloc) + return; + + pq_beginmessage(&buf, PqMsg_PrepStmtDeallocated); + pq_sendstring(&buf, name); + pq_endmessage(&buf); +} + /* * Internal version of DEALLOCATE * @@ -532,6 +555,9 @@ DropPreparedStatement(const char *stmt_name, bool showError) /* Now we can remove the hash table entry */ hash_search(prepared_queries, entry->stmt_name, HASH_REMOVE, NULL); + + /* Alert the client */ + SendStmtDeallocMsg(stmt_name); } } @@ -558,6 +584,9 @@ DropAllPreparedStatements(void) /* Now we can remove the hash table entry */ hash_search(prepared_queries, entry->stmt_name, HASH_REMOVE, NULL); } + + /* Alert the client */ + SendStmtDeallocMsg(""); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/tcop/backend_startup.c b/src/backend/tcop/backend_startup.c index 25205cee0fa..7e5a2d08310 100644 --- a/src/backend/tcop/backend_startup.c +++ b/src/backend/tcop/backend_startup.c @@ -806,12 +806,15 @@ retry: else if (strncmp(nameptr, "_pq_.", 5) == 0) { /* - * Any option beginning with _pq_. is reserved for use as a - * protocol-level option, but at present no such options are - * defined. + * Options beginning with _pq_. are protocol extensions. + * Recognized ones are handled here; report the rest as + * unsupported. */ - unrecognized_protocol_options = - lappend(unrecognized_protocol_options, pstrdup(nameptr)); + if (strcmp(nameptr, "_pq_.report_stmt_dealloc") == 0) + port->report_stmt_dealloc = true; + else + unrecognized_protocol_options = + lappend(unrecognized_protocol_options, pstrdup(nameptr)); } else { diff --git a/src/include/libpq/libpq-be.h b/src/include/libpq/libpq-be.h index 921b2daa4ff..82296a61aac 100644 --- a/src/include/libpq/libpq-be.h +++ b/src/include/libpq/libpq-be.h @@ -152,6 +152,9 @@ typedef struct Port char *cmdline_options; List *guc_options; + /* did client request prepared statement deallocation notifications? */ + bool report_stmt_dealloc; + /* * The startup packet application name, only used here for the "connection * authorized" log message. We shouldn't use this post-startup, instead diff --git a/src/include/libpq/protocol.h b/src/include/libpq/protocol.h index eae8f0e7238..7ea331f7210 100644 --- a/src/include/libpq/protocol.h +++ b/src/include/libpq/protocol.h @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ #define PqMsg_FunctionCallResponse 'V' #define PqMsg_CopyBothResponse 'W' #define PqMsg_ReadyForQuery 'Z' +#define PqMsg_PrepStmtDeallocated 'i' #define PqMsg_NoData 'n' #define PqMsg_PortalSuspended 's' #define PqMsg_ParameterDescription 't' diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/exports.txt b/src/interfaces/libpq/exports.txt index 1e3d5bd5867..1cf4d4b4980 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/libpq/exports.txt +++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/exports.txt @@ -211,3 +211,5 @@ PQdefaultAuthDataHook 208 PQfullProtocolVersion 209 appendPQExpBufferVA 210 PQgetThreadLock 211 +PQaddPrepStmtDeallocCallback 212 +PQprepStmtDeallocSupported 213 diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c index 4272d386e64..c55f7ec9942 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c +++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c @@ -700,6 +700,7 @@ pqDropServerData(PGconn *conn) /* Reset assorted other per-connection state */ conn->last_sqlstate[0] = '\0'; conn->pversion_negotiated = false; + conn->report_stmt_dealloc = true; /* unset if needed at conn start */ conn->auth_req_received = false; conn->client_finished_auth = false; conn->password_needed = false; @@ -5178,6 +5179,10 @@ freePGconn(PGconn *conn) free(conn->rowBuf); termPQExpBuffer(&conn->errorMessage); termPQExpBuffer(&conn->workBuffer); + if (conn->prepStmtDeallocCallbacks) + free(conn->prepStmtDeallocCallbacks); + if (conn->prepStmtDeallocCallbackArgs) + free(conn->prepStmtDeallocCallbackArgs); free(conn); } @@ -8426,3 +8431,56 @@ PQgetThreadLock(void) Assert(pg_g_threadlock); return pg_g_threadlock; } + +/* + * Registers a callback to be invoked whenever the server reports a prepared + * statement deallocation. arg is passed through to the callback unaltered. + */ +int +PQaddPrepStmtDeallocCallback(PGconn *conn, PQprepStmtDeallocCallback cb, + void *arg) +{ + int i; + PQprepStmtDeallocCallback *new_cbs; + void **new_args; + + if (!conn) + return 0; + + i = conn->nPrepStmtDeallocCallbacks; + + new_cbs = realloc(conn->prepStmtDeallocCallbacks, + (i + 1) * sizeof(PQprepStmtDeallocCallback)); + if (!new_cbs) + { + libpq_append_conn_error(conn, "out of memory"); + return 0; + } + conn->prepStmtDeallocCallbacks = new_cbs; + + new_args = realloc(conn->prepStmtDeallocCallbackArgs, + (i + 1) * sizeof(void *)); + if (!new_args) + { + libpq_append_conn_error(conn, "out of memory"); + return 0; + } + conn->prepStmtDeallocCallbackArgs = new_args; + + new_cbs[i] = cb; + new_args[i] = arg; + conn->nPrepStmtDeallocCallbacks = i + 1; + + return 1; +} + +/* + * Returns true if the server accepted the _pq_.report_stmt_dealloc extension. + * If false, no notifications will arrive and the caller must re-prepare on + * error. + */ +int +PQprepStmtDeallocSupported(PGconn *conn) +{ + return conn && conn->report_stmt_dealloc; +} diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-protocol3.c b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-protocol3.c index 78ffb1025d0..9da883f2ada 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-protocol3.c +++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-protocol3.c @@ -61,6 +61,30 @@ static size_t build_startup_packet(const PGconn *conn, char *packet, const PQEnvironmentOption *options); +/* + * Read a PrepStmtDeallocated message and invoke the registered callbacks. + * Broken out as a subroutine since it can occur in several places. + * + * Entry: 'i' message type and length already consumed. + * Exit: 0 on success, EOF if not enough data. + */ +static int +getPrepStmtDeallocated(PGconn *conn) +{ + if (pqGets(&conn->workBuffer, conn)) + return EOF; + + for (int i = 0; i < conn->nPrepStmtDeallocCallbacks; i++) + { + PQprepStmtDeallocCallback cb = conn->prepStmtDeallocCallbacks[i]; + void *arg = conn->prepStmtDeallocCallbackArgs[i]; + + cb(conn, arg, conn->workBuffer.data); + } + + return 0; +} + /* * parseInput: if appropriate, parse input data from backend * until input is exhausted or a stopping state is reached. @@ -184,6 +208,11 @@ pqParseInput3(PGconn *conn) if (getParameterStatus(conn)) return; } + else if (id == PqMsg_PrepStmtDeallocated) + { + if (getPrepStmtDeallocated(conn)) + return; + } else { /* Any other case is unexpected and we summarily skip it */ @@ -305,6 +334,10 @@ pqParseInput3(PGconn *conn) if (getParameterStatus(conn)) return; break; + case PqMsg_PrepStmtDeallocated: + if (getPrepStmtDeallocated(conn)) + return; + break; case PqMsg_BackendKeyData: /* @@ -1545,6 +1578,8 @@ pqGetNegotiateProtocolVersion3(PGconn *conn) { found_test_protocol_negotiation = true; } + else if (strcmp(conn->workBuffer.data, "_pq_.report_stmt_dealloc") == 0) + conn->report_stmt_dealloc = false; else { libpq_append_conn_error(conn, "received invalid protocol negotiation message: server reported an unsupported parameter that was not requested (\"%s\")", @@ -1906,6 +1941,10 @@ getCopyDataMessage(PGconn *conn) if (getParameterStatus(conn)) return 0; break; + case PqMsg_PrepStmtDeallocated: + if (getPrepStmtDeallocated(conn)) + return 0; + break; case PqMsg_CopyData: return msgLength; case PqMsg_CopyDone: @@ -2410,6 +2449,10 @@ pqFunctionCall3(PGconn *conn, Oid fnid, if (getParameterStatus(conn)) continue; break; + case PqMsg_PrepStmtDeallocated: + if (getPrepStmtDeallocated(conn)) + continue; + break; default: /* The backend violates the protocol. */ libpq_append_conn_error(conn, "protocol error: id=0x%x", id); @@ -2525,6 +2568,9 @@ build_startup_packet(const PGconn *conn, char *packet, if (conn->client_encoding_initial && conn->client_encoding_initial[0]) ADD_STARTUP_OPTION("client_encoding", conn->client_encoding_initial); + /* Ask the server to report prepared statement deallocations. */ + ADD_STARTUP_OPTION("_pq_.report_stmt_dealloc", ""); + /* * Add the test_protocol_negotiation option when greasing, to test that * servers properly report unsupported protocol options in addition to diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-trace.c b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-trace.c index c348b08c39b..e9f734187a2 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-trace.c +++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-trace.c @@ -543,6 +543,13 @@ pqTraceOutput_ParameterStatus(FILE *f, const char *message, int *cursor) pqTraceOutputString(f, message, cursor, false); } +static void +pqTraceOutput_PrepStmtDeallocated(FILE *f, const char *message, int *cursor) +{ + fprintf(f, "PrepStmtDeallocated\t"); + pqTraceOutputString(f, message, cursor, false); +} + static void pqTraceOutput_ParameterDescription(FILE *f, const char *message, int *cursor, bool regress) { @@ -793,6 +800,9 @@ pqTraceOutputMessage(PGconn *conn, const char *message, bool toServer) else pqTraceOutput_ParameterStatus(conn->Pfdebug, message, &logCursor); break; + case PqMsg_PrepStmtDeallocated: + pqTraceOutput_PrepStmtDeallocated(conn->Pfdebug, message, &logCursor); + break; case PqMsg_ParameterDescription: pqTraceOutput_ParameterDescription(conn->Pfdebug, message, &logCursor, regress); break; diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-fe.h b/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-fe.h index 8ecb9b4a4c7..d7432ce75ce 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-fe.h +++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-fe.h @@ -486,6 +486,17 @@ typedef void (*pgthreadlock_t) (int acquire); extern pgthreadlock_t PQregisterThreadLock(pgthreadlock_t newhandler); extern pgthreadlock_t PQgetThreadLock(void); +/* callbacks for prepared statement deallocation notifications */ +typedef void (*PQprepStmtDeallocCallback) (PGconn *conn, void *arg, + const char *name); + +extern int PQaddPrepStmtDeallocCallback(PGconn *conn, + PQprepStmtDeallocCallback cb, + void *arg); + +/* whether the server will report prepared statement deallocations */ +extern int PQprepStmtDeallocSupported(PGconn *conn); + /* === in fe-trace.c === */ extern void PQtrace(PGconn *conn, FILE *debug_port); extern void PQuntrace(PGconn *conn); diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-int.h b/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-int.h index 461b39620c3..0631535b58d 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-int.h +++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-int.h @@ -507,6 +507,8 @@ struct pg_conn int sversion; /* server version, e.g. 70401 for 7.4.1 */ bool pversion_negotiated; /* true if NegotiateProtocolVersion * was received */ + bool report_stmt_dealloc; /* true if the server accepted the + * _pq_.report_stmt_dealloc extension */ bool auth_req_received; /* true if any type of auth req received */ bool password_needed; /* true if server demanded a password */ bool gssapi_used; /* true if authenticated via gssapi */ @@ -532,6 +534,10 @@ struct pg_conn void (*cleanup_async_auth) (PGconn *conn); pgsocket altsock; /* alternative socket for client to poll */ + /* Callbacks and pass-through args for prepared statement deallocations */ + PQprepStmtDeallocCallback *prepStmtDeallocCallbacks; + void **prepStmtDeallocCallbackArgs; + int nPrepStmtDeallocCallbacks; /* Transient state needed while establishing connection */ PGTargetServerType target_server_type; /* desired session properties */ diff --git a/src/test/modules/libpq_pipeline/traces/prepared.trace b/src/test/modules/libpq_pipeline/traces/prepared.trace index aeb5de109e0..5d36fb0056d 100644 --- a/src/test/modules/libpq_pipeline/traces/prepared.trace +++ b/src/test/modules/libpq_pipeline/traces/prepared.trace @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ B 113 RowDescription 4 "?column?" NNNN 0 NNNN 4 -1 0 "?column?" NNNN 0 NNNN 655 B 5 ReadyForQuery I F 16 Close S "select_one" F 4 Sync +B 15 PrepStmtDeallocated "select_one" B 4 CloseComplete B 5 ReadyForQuery I F 16 Describe S "select_one" -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --569rkL4UxgNPPO44-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-02 22:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 327+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-06-02 22:01 [PATCH v3 1/1] tell client when prepared statements are deallocated Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox