agora inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Messages from [email protected]

Re: xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string
  2009-07-29 18:17 UTC  [email protected]

Re: xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string
  2009-07-29 14:14 UTC  [email protected]

Re: xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string
  2009-07-28 20:30 UTC  [email protected]

xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string
  2009-07-28 19:21 UTC  [email protected]

WAL archive, warm backup and read-only slave
  2009-05-24 22:41 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Block-level CRC checks
  2008-10-01 21:51 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Block-level CRC checks
  2008-10-01 15:37 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Block-level CRC checks
  2008-10-01 13:38 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Block-level CRC checks
  2008-10-01 13:29 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Block-level CRC checks
  2008-09-30 21:13 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Block-level CRC checks
  2008-09-30 19:17 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Ad-hoc table type?
  2008-09-29 11:16 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Ad-hoc table type?
  2008-09-29 01:27 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Ad-hoc table type?
  2008-09-28 23:30 UTC  [email protected]

Ad-hoc table type?
  2008-09-28 22:09 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Function call order dependency
  2008-09-03 16:55 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Function call order dependency
  2008-09-03 16:46 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Function call order dependency
  2008-09-03 16:34 UTC  [email protected]

Re: Function call order dependency
  2008-09-03 16:10 UTC  [email protected]

Function call order dependency
  2008-09-03 12:24 UTC  [email protected]

SSL configure patch
  2008-06-13 13:35 UTC  [email protected]

SSL and USER_CERT_FILE patch
  2008-05-15 18:57 UTC  [email protected]

Re: SSL and USER_CERT_FILE
  2008-05-15 17:44 UTC  [email protected]

Re: SSL and USER_CERT_FILE round 2
  2008-05-15 15:34 UTC  [email protected]

SSL and USER_CERT_FILE round 2
  2008-05-15 14:25 UTC  [email protected]

Re: SSL and USER_CERT_FILE
  2008-05-15 13:53 UTC  [email protected]

Re: SSL and USER_CERT_FILE
  2008-05-15 13:49 UTC  [email protected]

Re: SSL and USER_CERT_FILE
  2008-05-15 13:31 UTC  [email protected]

SSL and USER_CERT_FILE
  2008-05-15 12:47 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Permanent settings
  2008-02-21 18:12 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Permanent settings
  2008-02-21 17:53 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
  2006-10-17 20:47 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
  2006-10-17 20:45 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
  2006-10-17 20:42 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
  2006-10-17 18:46 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
  2006-10-17 18:41 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
  2006-10-17 18:37 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
  2006-10-17 18:35 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
  2006-10-17 17:44 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Syntax bug? Group by?
  2006-10-17 15:34 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features
  2006-10-12 10:58 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features
  2006-10-12 01:21 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features
  2006-10-11 23:18 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Index Tuning Features
  2006-10-11 19:27 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Index Tuning Features
  2006-10-11 18:59 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Index Tuning Features
  2006-10-11 11:21 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Index Tuning Features
  2006-10-11 00:17 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Upgrading a database dump/restore
  2006-10-09 16:47 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Upgrading a database dump/restore
  2006-10-09 16:30 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Upgrading a database dump/restore
  2006-10-09 15:50 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Upgrading a database dump/restore
  2006-10-09 03:44 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Upgrading a database dump/restore
  2006-10-05 20:39 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Upgrading a database dump/restore
  2006-10-05 20:08 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Upgrading a database dump/restore
  2006-10-05 19:46 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Query Failed, out of memory
  2006-10-05 19:23 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Query Failed, out of memory
  2006-10-05 17:03 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Query Failed, out of memory
  2006-10-05 16:55 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Query Failed, out of memory
  2006-10-05 16:15 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Query Failed, out of memory
  2006-10-05 16:12 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Query Failed, out of memory
  2006-10-05 15:56 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Netflix Prize data
  2006-10-05 00:28 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Netflix Prize data
  2006-10-04 23:53 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Netflix Prize data
  2006-10-04 22:57 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Netflix Prize data
  2006-10-04 22:51 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Netflix Prize data
  2006-10-04 20:43 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Mapping arbitriary and heirachical XML to tuple
  2006-09-08 21:26 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: update/insert,
  2006-07-05 14:45 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

update/insert, delete/insert efficiency WRT vacuum and MVCC
  2006-07-03 13:28 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
  2006-06-27 19:02 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
  2006-06-27 18:49 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-27 13:03 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-27 12:48 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum row?
  2006-06-26 13:37 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-26 13:17 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-26 13:10 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-25 10:52 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

vacuum row?
  2006-06-24 18:29 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-24 18:24 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-24 14:53 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-24 14:21 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-24 13:23 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-24 12:14 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-24 02:57 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-23 19:30 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-23 19:10 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-23 18:30 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-23 14:50 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-23 14:30 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-23 13:00 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-23 11:57 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-23 10:37 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-22 20:36 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-22 19:00 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-22 17:56 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-22 17:49 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-22 16:41 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-22 16:33 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-22 13:59 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-22 10:52 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

vacuum, performance, and MVCC
  2006-06-21 18:10 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Preventing DELETE and UPDATE without a WHERE clause?
  2006-06-17 10:48 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Preventing DELETE and UPDATE without a WHERE clause?
  2006-06-16 18:52 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: How to avoid transaction ID wrap
  2006-06-08 14:23 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: How to avoid transaction ID wrap
  2006-06-07 23:07 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: How to avoid transaction ID wrap
  2006-06-07 03:11 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: AGREGATE FUNCTIONS
  2006-06-07 03:09 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

How to avoid transaction ID wrap
  2006-06-06 12:42 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: [PERFORM] psql -A (unaligned format) eats too much
  2006-06-05 17:01 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: [PERFORM] psql -A (unaligned format) eats too much
  2006-06-05 16:48 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: COPY (query) TO file
  2006-06-03 01:25 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: COPY (query) TO file
  2006-06-02 22:44 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: COPY (query) TO file
  2006-06-02 21:23 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: COPY (query) TO file
  2006-06-02 14:23 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: COPY (query) TO file
  2006-06-02 14:01 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

COPY (query) TO file
  2006-06-02 13:39 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe
  2006-06-01 12:52 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes
  2006-05-26 23:32 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Performance Issues
  2006-05-23 17:04 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
  2006-05-22 18:52 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: String Similarity
  2006-05-22 11:47 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
  2006-05-20 17:58 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
  2006-05-20 14:41 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: String Similarity
  2006-05-20 13:12 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: String Similarity
  2006-05-20 11:29 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: String Similarity
  2006-05-20 01:00 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: String Similarity
  2006-05-19 21:10 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

String Similarity
  2006-05-19 20:00 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
  2006-05-19 19:39 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
  2006-05-19 15:29 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
  2006-05-18 19:11 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
  2006-05-18 18:58 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

[OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
  2006-05-18 00:08 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-03-01 01:03 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-28 17:36 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-28 04:52 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-28 04:34 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-27 20:38 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-27 20:14 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-27 16:48 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-27 14:39 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-22 14:22 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-22 13:55 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-22 04:37 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-21 19:49 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-21 16:14 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
  2006-02-21 14:39 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_service.conf
  2006-02-19 18:59 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_service.conf
  2006-02-19 18:57 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_service.conf
  2006-02-19 18:55 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_service.conf
  2006-02-19 15:52 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_service.conf
  2006-02-19 15:41 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

pg_service.conf
  2006-02-19 15:00 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
  2006-02-13 19:38 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
  2006-02-13 16:57 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
  2006-02-13 15:44 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
  2006-02-13 12:57 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Use cases
  2006-02-12 21:55 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: SpeedComparison
  2006-02-12 15:18 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Analyze and vacuum, they are sort of mandatory....
  2006-02-12 15:05 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Analyze and vacuum, they are sort of mandatory....
  2006-02-12 13:47 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Analyze and vacuum, they are sort of mandatory....
  2006-02-11 18:33 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-10 17:16 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-10 14:57 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-09 23:53 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-09 20:45 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-09 19:49 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-09 19:03 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-09 18:28 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-09 16:42 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-09 16:14 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-09 15:53 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-09 15:18 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
  2006-02-09 15:10 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_hba.conf alternative
  2006-02-08 14:26 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_hba.conf alternative
  2006-02-08 13:53 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Shared memory and memory context question
  2006-02-06 14:43 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Shared memory and memory context question
  2006-02-06 05:17 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Shared memory and memory context question
  2006-02-06 03:37 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Multiple logical databases
  2006-02-03 20:28 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Multiple logical databases
  2006-02-03 20:26 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Multiple logical databases
  2006-02-03 15:23 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Multiple logical databases
  2006-02-03 13:05 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Multiple logical databases
  2006-02-03 03:14 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Multiple logical databases
  2006-02-02 19:05 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Multiple logical databases
  2006-02-02 15:57 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Multiple logical databases
  2006-02-02 15:23 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx
  2006-01-31 16:04 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx
  2006-01-31 15:46 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx
  2006-01-30 21:35 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx
  2006-01-30 02:27 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx
  2006-01-29 20:15 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx
  2006-01-29 19:04 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Want to add to contrib.... xmldbx
  2006-01-29 18:21 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf
  2005-08-08 20:59 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf
  2005-08-08 12:56 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: US Census database (Tiger 2004FE) - 4.4G
  2005-08-04 21:22 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: Solving the OID-collision problem
  2005-08-04 17:34 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_dump -- data and schema only?
  2005-08-04 17:32 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

Re: pg_dump -- data and schema only?
  2005-08-04 15:52 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>

US Census database (Tiger 2004FE) - 4.4G
  2005-08-04 15:26 UTC  Mark Woodward <[email protected]>


200+ results

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox