Received: from mail2.gmx.net (mail2.gmx.net [194.221.183.62]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA40340 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:20:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from hakan42@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 17666 invoked by uid 0); 22 Feb 2000 17:20:18 -0000 Received: from ns1032.munich.netsurf.de (HELO taubnessel.pcp.local) (195.180.235.32) by mail2.gmx.net with SMTP; 22 Feb 2000 17:20:18 -0000 From: Hakan Tandogan To: Peter Mount , pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver? Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:18:24 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain References: <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C23C@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk> In-Reply-To: <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C23C@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00022218230105.10757@taubnessel.pcp.local> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, you wrote: > The one in CVS is the one that should have been 6.5.3. > > However, I do have at home the one that should be for 7.0. However due > to problems here (like a network that keeps dying on me, and other nice > little problems), I've not finished it yet into a state that can be > included into CVS. Will those changes be in 7.0 final or is the "feature freeze" already in effect? If you want, I'd be delighted to test pre-releases of your 7.0 driver. BTW, did you read my other mail about BINARY field types? Any chance that 7.0 could help me with that problem? For example, the LO type could be reported as BINARY... Regards, Hakan -- Hakan Tandogan hakan@iconsult.com ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0 Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen Fax.: +49-9131-9047-77 "Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"