Received: from btclick.com (mta02.btfusion.com [62.172.195.247]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2D9hdx86371 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 04:43:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gordan@freeuk.com) Received: from albatros ([213.121.89.150]) by btclick.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.05) with SMTP id GA4R0O01.J92 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:43:36 +0000 Message-ID: <000e01c0aba1$0438f5a0$800010ac@localdomain> From: "Gordan Bobic" To: References: <20010311223818.18682.qmail@mailhost.sidereal.kz> <20010311223818.18682.qmail@mailhost.sidereal.kz> <3.0.5.32.20010313153121.009643c0@192.228.128.13> <20010313090044.25147.qmail@mailhost.sidereal.kz> Subject: Re: Re: Data type for storing images? Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:35:59 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Archive-Number: 200103/567 X-Sequence-Number: 6068 More to the point, what would be a reason for not using bytea to replace BLOBs completely? ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 9:00 AM Subject: [GENERAL] Re: Data type for storing images? > > If bytea can be unlimited size in 7.1, does that mean I can finally > put all my 1gb of MP3s into Postgres, thereby combining all my > favorite stuff? > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > >