Received: from mail4.visi.net (geneva.visi.net [206.246.194.4]) by hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA04348; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 19:36:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brywhite@visi.net) Received: from bryans400 (ppp46.ts1-3.NewportNews.visi.net [209.8.197.110]) by mail4.visi.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA22508; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 19:41:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001001be2179$e3e752a0$8c02020a@bryans400> From: "Bryan White" To: "Thomas G. Lockhart" , , "PostgreSQL Interfaces" Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] crypt not included when compiling libpgtcl !!!!!!! Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 19:38:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 >> (I am currently packaging 6.4 into an RPM for Red Hat 5.2). > >Is this an alternative to the RedHat packaging, or are you using the >same layout and RPM setup that the RedHat 6.3 package had? Just curious; >I've been thinking about trying to help with RPM support but would be >happy that someone else is looking after it. > >btw, we are currently looking at a date/time peculiarity in Postgres >with glibc2 which gives funny results for at least one test case. You >might want to stay in touch so we can fix that up for you also, once we >have a good workaround. > >Actually, we should also test with RH5.2 to make sure the date/time >problem is still present, since it may have been due to a problem in >glibc2 which has since been fixed. I'm only running RH4.2 and RH5.1 so >can't directly test that myself... I am running PG 6.4 on RH5.2. If you give me the details I can try a test.