Received: from approximator.webwork.co.uk ([195.188.128.3])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f689ewa24627
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 8 Jul 2001 05:40:58 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from techsupport@ntb.org.uk)
Received: from wslibretto (dhcp39.north-east.co.uk [195.188.128.39])
	by approximator.webwork.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP
	id EB536118A; Sun,  8 Jul 2001 10:38:29 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <001201c10792$799349c0$2780bcc3@northeast.co.uk>
From: "NTB Technical Support" <techsupport@ntb.org.uk>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
References: <000d01c1056a$00dadc20$2780bcc3@northeast.co.uk>
	<3419.994351105@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<004301c10578$0d4dc720$2780bcc3@northeast.co.uk>
	<3779.994357122@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3B450464.8E52CA70@tpf.co.jp>
Subject: Re: ADO and ODBC: More
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 10:43:41 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
X-Archive-Number: 200107/36
X-Sequence-Number: 1789

> > >> I'd write it off as broken code in ADO, and program around it by not
> > >> using column names that require quoting.  Ugly answer, but it's not
> > >> clear that you have an alternative (short of waiting for an ADO fix).

Thanks for the various inputs - looks like this is what we'll have to do.

> ADO doesn't need ODBC essentially and M$ SQL Server has
> its own OLE DB provider. PostgreSQL doesn't have its OLE
> DB provider implementation yet

Just out of curiosity, I ran the ATL OLE DB Provider wizard in VC++ to see
what might be involved in doing this; soon thought better of it....


Tim