Received: from thor.tht.net (thor.tht.net [209.47.145.4]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eB7MNvP05408 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 17:23:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from martin@math.unl.edu.ar) Received: from math.unl.edu.ar (IDENT:root@math.unl.edu.ar [170.210.15.78]) by thor.tht.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA97056 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 18:24:12 GMT (envelope-from martin@math.unl.edu.ar) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by math.unl.edu.ar (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA18800; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:22:56 -0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" From: "Martin A. Marques" To: Peter Eisentraut , The Hermit Hacker Subject: Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:22:55 -0300 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: PostgreSQL Development References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00120719225507.09345@math.unl.edu.ar> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archive-Number: 200012/297 X-Sequence-Number: 1793 On Thursday 07 December 2000 18:35, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Ideally (IMHO) we'd build the documentation right in place when making the > distribution tarball, i.e., broken docs, no release. I'm not sure how to > usefully extrapolate that to the snapshot builds, though. > > Another thing we should think about is to not tar.gz the documentation > files. That way we could create useful incremental diffs between releases > later on. Any comments here? If you dont't tar.gz the docs, what should the downladable format be? CVS? I think CVS would be great. -- "And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martín Marqués email: martin@math.unl.edu.ar Santa Fe - Argentina http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/ Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar -----------------------------------------------------------------