Received: from MailAndNews.com (MailAndNews.com [199.29.68.161]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBDGc8p22105 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:38:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rwankar@MailAndNews.com) Received: from nova [203.197.82.159] (rwankar@MailAndNews.com) by MailAndNews.com; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:07:50 -0500 X-WM-Posted-At: MailAndNews.com; Wed, 13 Dec 00 11:07:50 -0500 Message-ID: <002c01c0651e$fa634d50$0b00a8c0@nova> From: "Ravindra Wankar" To: Subject: JDBC 2.0 support and reliability Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:38:38 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0026_01C0654D.0DE03AE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Archive-Number: 200012/110 X-Sequence-Number: 454 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C0654D.0DE03AE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can anyone share experiences using the latest Postgresql JDBC driver? What = I'm specifically looking for is 1. Is it JDBC 2.0 compliant? 2. Are all interfaces implemented (If not is there a list of unimplemented = interfaces). I found that the getImportedKeys method is not implemented whe= n using TableGen to generate code that accesses the DB. 3. Is it production quality? Thanks, -- Ravi. ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C0654D.0DE03AE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can anyone share experiences using the lat= est=20 Postgresql JDBC driver? What I'm specifically looking for is

1. Is it JDBC 2.0 compliant?

2. Are all interfaces implemented (If not = is there=20 a list of unimplemented interfaces). I found that the getImportedKeys metho= d is=20 not implemented when using TableGen to generate code that accesses the=20 DB.

3. Is it production quality?

Thanks,

-- Ravi.

------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C0654D.0DE03AE0--