From rwankar@iname.com Wed Dec 13 16:38:08 2000 Received: from MailAndNews.com (MailAndNews.com [199.29.68.161]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBDGc8p22105 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:38:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rwankar@MailAndNews.com) Received: from nova [203.197.82.159] (rwankar@MailAndNews.com) by MailAndNews.com; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:07:50 -0500 X-WM-Posted-At: MailAndNews.com; Wed, 13 Dec 00 11:07:50 -0500 Message-ID: <002c01c0651e$fa634d50$0b00a8c0@nova> From: "Ravindra Wankar" To: Subject: JDBC 2.0 support and reliability Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:38:38 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0026_01C0654D.0DE03AE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Archive-Number: 200012/110 X-Sequence-Number: 454 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C0654D.0DE03AE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can anyone share experiences using the latest Postgresql JDBC driver? What = I'm specifically looking for is 1. Is it JDBC 2.0 compliant? 2. Are all interfaces implemented (If not is there a list of unimplemented = interfaces). I found that the getImportedKeys method is not implemented whe= n using TableGen to generate code that accesses the DB. 3. Is it production quality? Thanks, -- Ravi. ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C0654D.0DE03AE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can anyone share experiences using the lat= est=20 Postgresql JDBC driver? What I'm specifically looking for is

1. Is it JDBC 2.0 compliant?

2. Are all interfaces implemented (If not = is there=20 a list of unimplemented interfaces). I found that the getImportedKeys metho= d is=20 not implemented when using TableGen to generate code that accesses the=20 DB.

3. Is it production quality?

Thanks,

-- Ravi.

------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C0654D.0DE03AE0-- From petermount@maidstone.gov.uk Mon Dec 18 09:40:38 2000 Received: from finch-post-12.mail.demon.net (finch-post-12.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.41]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBI9ec671434 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 04:40:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from petermount@maidstone.gov.uk) Received: from mailgate.maidstone.gov.uk ([194.159.6.98] helo=gatekeeper.maidstone.gov.uk) by finch-post-12.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 147wmm-000O10-0C; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:40:48 +0000 Received: from exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk (exchange1.maidstone.gov.uk [172.16.0.150]) by gatekeeper.maidstone.gov.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA17930; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:40:47 GMT Received: by exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:37:11 -0000 Message-ID: <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B66A@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk> From: Peter Mount To: "'Ravindra Wankar'" , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: RE: JDBC 2.0 support and reliability Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:37:02 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C068D6.1399A3E0" X-Archive-Number: 200012/149 X-Sequence-Number: 493 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C068D6.1399A3E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" -- Peter Mount Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council Email: petermount@maidstone.gov.uk WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough Council -----Original Message----- From: Ravindra Wankar [mailto:rwankar@iname.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 4:09 PM To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: [INTERFACES] JDBC 2.0 support and reliability Can anyone share experiences using the latest Postgresql JDBC driver? What I'm specifically looking for is 1. Is it JDBC 2.0 compliant? [Peter Mount] Not fully, but getting there 2. Are all interfaces implemented (If not is there a list of unimplemented interfaces). I found that the getImportedKeys method is not implemented when using TableGen to generate code that accesses the DB. [Peter Mount] The interfaces are getting done one by one... 3. Is it production quality? [Peter Mount] Some people think so ;-) From release to release it's getting better. Thanks, -- Ravi. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C068D6.1399A3E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"

--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council
Email: petermount@maidstone.gov.uk
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough Council

-----Original Message-----
From: Ravindra Wankar [mailto:rwankar@iname.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 4:09 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: [INTERFACES] JDBC 2.0 support and reliability

Can anyone share experiences using the latest Postgresql JDBC driver? What I'm specifically looking for is

1. Is it JDBC 2.0 compliant?
[Peter Mount] Not fully, but getting there

2. Are all interfaces implemented (If not is there a list of unimplemented interfaces). I found that the getImportedKeys method is not implemented when using TableGen to generate code that accesses the DB.
[Peter Mount] The interfaces are getting done one by one...

3. Is it production quality?
[Peter Mount] Some people think so ;-) From release to release it's getting better.

Thanks,

-- Ravi.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C068D6.1399A3E0--