Message-ID: <003901bfe238$f2603320$6401a8c0@byron>
From: "Byron Nikolaidis" <byron.nikolaidis@home.com>
To: <jeam@themail.com>, <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
References: <200006271130.GAA01884@eperke.themail.com>
Subject: Re: Inverted result set, why?
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 22:14:39 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

If you want a specific order based on the time, you could add a timestamp
field to the table that would default to the current time when the record
was inserted (see create table...default...) .  Then you can "order by" on
the timestamp, either ascending or descending if desired.

Byron

----- Original Message -----
From: <jeam@themail.com>
To: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 7:30 AM
Subject: [INTERFACES] Inverted result set, why?


>
> Hi there,
>
> Using the psql utility I insert three records into a 6.5.3 postgresql
table with or without indexes. I SELECT * and the records are retrieved in
the order I inserted them, and that's correct.
>
> However, if I SELECT the records from a Delphi 5 application, using the
BDE and the latest ODBC driver, the result set is inverted, i.e., on the
same index key, the last record I inserted is listed first and so on.
>
> This forces me to use an index even for tables I don't need one. Or worse
yet, I need to create a second, auxiliary field on the table and add it to
the index when I have one in order to get the proper order of the inserted
records.
>
> I don't know if I should blame Borland's BDE or the ODBC driver.
>
> Any clues about this problem?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Jorge.
> __________________________________________________________________
> Make A Buck Or Two @ TheMail.com - Free Internet Email
> Sign-up today at http://www.themail.com/ref.htm?ref=908313
>
>
>