Message-ID: <003901c0700f$5a0b8a60$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
To: "PostgreSQL-interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
References: <183FA749499ED311B6550000F87E206C0C94D1@srv.ctlno.com>
Subject: Re: RE: [HACKERS] PHP and PostgreSQL 
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 09:14:40 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Yeah, this is not a "bug", but a feature. :)

In a nutshell, the persistent connection number is not how many persistent
connections there are available to the webserver.  It is the number
available per webserver PROCESS.

So, if you have 5 persistent connections, but 10 webserver processes open,
you have 50 persistent connections open.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew" <matt@ctlno.com>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; "PostgreSQL-development"
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; "PostgreSQL-interfaces"
<pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 8:54 AM
Subject: [INTERFACES] RE: [HACKERS] PHP and PostgreSQL


>
> I have been asked by the major PHP developer Rasmus Lerdorf to see
> if
> the PostgreSQL/PHP interface needs any improvements.
>
> Is the current PostgreSQL interface module in PHP adequate?  Does it
> support all the current libpq features?
>
>
> The only problem we have run into (and I have heard of others having this
> problem also) is with persistent connections.  I have seen discussion on
> persistent connection problems but I'm not sure the problem was ever
> resolved.  The problem we have seen is that when using persistent
> connections the web server doesn't seen to reuse the connections or
somthing
> to that effect.  The result being that we eventually use up our postgres
> limit of 48 connections and nothing can connect to postgre anymore.  It is
> possible that this is a configuration problem that we haven't sufficiently
> investigated, but I meniton it because I have heard other talk of this.
> Anyone have more information?
>
> Matthew