Received: from hobart.southcom.com.au (hobart.southcom.com.au [203.60.16.2]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA43818 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 18:34:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from shevlandj@kpi.com.au) Received: from elite (pA40.hbt.southcom.com.au [203.60.23.65]) by hobart.southcom.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA51990; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:34:24 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from shevlandj@kpi.com.au) Message-ID: <004001bf6f3f$11a96480$0100a8c0@kpi.com.au> From: "Joe Shevland" To: "Peter Mount" , "'Jaume Pausas'" , References: <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C15D@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:38:44 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Oi oi! Is 7.0 close and whats in the beast? Thanks, Joe -- Any views stated are in the hope that Peter Mount moves quickly on the PostgreSQL JDBC driver ;) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Mount" To: "'Jaume Pausas'" ; Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 6:14 AM Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) > If you mean the javax.sql standard extensions, they are in the 7.0 > release. > > ie: I'm currently merging the supplied sources into the cvs source at > the moment. > > Peter > > -- > Peter Mount > Enterprise Support > Maidstone Borough Council > Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jaume Pausas [mailto:a1649@dis.ulpgc.es] > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 1:16 PM > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org > Subject: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) > > > Hi > > I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that some > drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource > interface. Does postgresql driver include it? > > Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database? > > > > ************ > > ************ >