Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
 [38.138.71.194])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0IDdZ050742
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:39:36 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from aalang@rutgersinsurance.com)
Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51])
	by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA28236
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:43:22 -0500
Message-ID: <004701c08154$5e3f0c00$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
To: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
References: <NDBBKNFDELOHICEHIMGGKEDLCJAA.oserra@fondos.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:40:38 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Archive-Number: 200101/189
X-Sequence-Number: 807

I agree also... I don't do C programming, so a huge chunk of the list info I
scan and delete.  Sounds logical.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oscar Serrano" <oserra@fondos.net>
To: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:02 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...


>
>
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: pgsql-interfaces-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-interfaces-owner@postgresql.org]En nombre de Dave Page
> > Enviado el: jueves, 18 de enero de 2001 9:06
> > Para: 'The Hermit Hacker'; pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> > Asunto: RE: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:scrappy@hub.org]
> > > Sent: 18 January 2001 03:26
> > > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> > > Subject: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > After some discussions with various members of the project, it was
> > > suggested that an RFC be sent out to the -interfaces list asking for
> > > opinions ...
> > >
> > > Due to the growing volume on these lists, primarily around
> > > the ODBC and
> > > JDBC drivers, I'm proposing that a split to this list be
> > > made, so that we
> > > have:
>
>
> I completly agree. I'm not interested in JDBC nor ODBC.
> thank you.
>
> Oscar Serrano.