Message-ID: <00a901c05949$d0e61c40$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011280942540.23165-100000@rksystems.com>
Subject: Re: postgreSQL and javascript
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:45:13 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

No, you probably have it exactly correct...  Just like peter said though,
people using the names interchangeably is aggravating.

Of course, no offense to anyone on the list, when you are in conversation
with someone and they do that, you get a good idea of actually what they
know then.  That is one of my first signs to discount someone as a valid
source.

You know the ad campaign: "Pork. The other white meat"?  Maybe their should
be one for Java: "Java.  Has nothing to do with the script."

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Kline" <bkline@rksystems.com>
To: "Peter Mount" <petermount@maidstone.gov.uk>
Cc: "'Adam Lang'" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>;
<pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 9:54 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] postgreSQL and javascript


> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Peter Mount wrote:
>
> > They have some time ago, just no one's picked up on it - EMCEA (may
> > have the wrong spelling).
>
> Well, sort of.  ECMAScript [1] is a standard of which JavaScript is the
> most popular implementation.  Good luck getting the name replaced.  In
> light of the opportunity for JavaScript developers to capitalize on the
> confusion, which would tend to boost the perceived worth of their
> resumes in the eyes of the confused, I don't predict much chance of
> success for a name change.  But perhaps I'm being too cynical.  :->}
>
> [1] ftp://ftp.ecma.ch/ecma-st/Ecma-262.pdf
>
> --
> Bob Kline
> mailto:bkline@rksystems.com
> http://www.rksystems.com