X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Received: from houston.familyhealth.com.au (unknown [203.59.48.253]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E55475AE5 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:43:37 -0500 (EST) Received: (from root@localhost) by houston.familyhealth.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2B2heI05321 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 10:43:40 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from chriskl@familyhealth.com.au) Received: from mariner (mariner.internal [192.168.0.101]) by houston.familyhealth.com.au (8.11.6/8.9.3) with SMTP id h2B2hH705136; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 10:43:17 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: <00b801c2e777$faeaede0$6500a8c0@fhp.internal> From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" To: "Bruce Momjian" , "Tom Lane" Cc: "Justin Clift" , References: <200303102330.h2ANUii26036@candle.pha.pa.us> <25711.1047339387@sss.pgh.pa.us> Subject: Re: Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 10:43:21 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-scanner: scanned by Inflex 0.1.5c - (http://www.inflex.co.za/) X-Archive-Number: 200303/406 X-Sequence-Number: 36652 > I had been leaning to May 1 beta, but am happy to switch to June 1 if > you feel that makes an improvement in the odds of completing the Windows > port. (I think it will also improve the odds of finishing this protocol > stuff I've taken on...) I don't want to see it pushed further than that > without good concrete arguments for doing so. There really is no rush... I'm well-versed in PostgreSQL, and even I haven't upgraded some of our production servers to even 7.3 yet (thanks to pg_dump dependency nightmare).. BTW, so no-one conflicts, I'm doing up pg_get_triggerdef(oid) at the moment. Once that's done, I'll be able to submit a redone psql \d output that includes the trigger definition. Cheers, Chris