Message-ID: <00d501bec311$6eda1940$3d063a8e@educ.sfu.ca>
From: "Gregory W Burnham" <gburnham@sfu.ca>
To: <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>, "Ken J. Wright" <ken@ori-ind.com>
References: <3.0.1.32.19990630081849.009a0660@ori-ind.com>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:58:40 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Does your email client have a 'reply to all' function?
That way you'll be replying to the person who wrote the
post, and the list.

Gregory W Burnham
Lead Technologist
Excite
Simon Fraser University
604 291 3615 (ph)
604 291 5679 (fx)
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken J. Wright <ken@ori-ind.com>
To: <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 08:18 AM
Subject: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing


> I could not find on the PostgreSQL web site, who to send this to, so I'll
> just start here because at least I won't get bounced. There is no
Reply-To:
> line in the messages recieved from this list. So just hitting reply in my
> mail client will always default To: to the sender of the original message.
> Consequently, I have to always remember to change the To: back to the
list,
> or always cc: the list and know that the original sender is always getting
> two messages. Could this be changed? Or is there a good reason that it is,
> and should stay this way? This is the only list of many that I s-u-bscribe
> (<- without the dashes, this message bounced!) to that has this annoyance
> (for me). Anybody else?
>
> Cheers!
>
> Ken
>
>