Received: from mail.postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0IJ8m090533
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:08:48 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from pgsql-interfaces-owner@postgresql.org)
Received: from cncware.whidbey.com ([209.166.87.125])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0I7Rq021434
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 18 Jan 2001 02:27:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ken@cncware.com)
Received: from rover.cncware.org (IDENT:ken@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cncware.whidbey.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA21607;
	Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:27:49 -0800
From: Ken Wright <ken@cncware.com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:27:41 -0800
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29]
Content-Type: text/plain
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101172315410.548-100000@thelab.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101172315410.548-100000@thelab.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0101172316160L.19103@rover.cncware.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archive-Number: 200101/202
X-Sequence-Number: 820

I agree with the proposed split described below. It does simplify the weeding
process. As for changing -interfaces to -interfaces-misc, it makes little
difference to me. Re-subscribing is not a big deal.

> 	pgsql-interfaces-odbc@postgresql.org
> 		- ODBC related discussions
> 
> 	pgsql-interfaces-jdbc@postgresql.org
> 		- JDBC related discussions
> 
> 	pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> 		- libpq, libpq++, python, tcl