Received: from edison.base2inc.com (root@[206.229.85.132]) by hub.org
	(8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id AAA05418 for
	<pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>;
	Fri, 28 Aug 1998 00:06:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tesla (tesla.base2inc.com [206.229.85.131])
	by edison.base2inc.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA04926
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 23:04:18 -0500
Message-ID: <011c01bdd23a$0a4f30a0$8355e5ce@tesla.base2inc.com>
Reply-To: "Frank Morton" <fmorton@mail.base2inc.com>
From: "Frank Morton" <fmorton@mail.base2inc.com>
To: <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: JDBC Limit?
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 23:12:15 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4

I am using the current release and when using JDBC I frequently
get a java.io.IOException: Broken pipe under heavy load conditions.
Is there a limit anywhere on the number of concurrent connections
to a single database or table within a database? Or any other limit
that could stop connections from opening or being forced to close?