From kiessig.rene@gmx.de Fri Sep 6 10:05:08 2002 Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851C9475E28 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 06:05:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ns.ice.mpg.de (ns.ice.mpg.de [195.37.47.10]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73126475E02 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 06:05:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.8.11.51] (helo=gen15) by ns.ice.mpg.de with smtp (Exim 3.14 #17) id 17nFzA-0003y8-00 for pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:05:08 +0200 Message-ID: <012a01c2558d$4e1cdfa0$330b080a@gen15> From: "Rene Kiessig" To: Subject: Views in pgaccess Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:08:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0127_01C2559E.11936020" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200209/50 X-Sequence-Number: 3111 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0127_01C2559E.11936020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hallo, had anyone the problem that in pgaccess views are not listed? I use the PostgreSQL DB with linux and I created views within pgaccess as w= ell as with psql. In both cases they are not listed in pgaccess. For me it is not so important, but the users would like to have it. I tried a newer version, but the same problem occured. Has anyone a solution or ideas what I could do or had even anyone the same = problem? Rene ------=_NextPart_000_0127_01C2559E.11936020 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hallo,
 
had anyone the problem that in pgacce= ss views=20 are not listed?
I use the PostgreSQL DB with linux and I=20 created views within pgaccess as well as with psql.
In both cases they are not listed in=20 pgaccess.
For me it is not so important, but the use= rs would=20 like to have it.
I tried a newer version, but the same prob= lem=20 occured.
Has anyone a solution or ideas what I= could=20 do or had even anyone the same problem?
 
Rene
 
------=_NextPart_000_0127_01C2559E.11936020-- From brett_schwarz@yahoo.com Mon Sep 9 15:47:55 2002 Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E6D476F22 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:47:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp016.mail.yahoo.com (smtp016.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.113]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5046476E9D for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:43:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pppoe0564.gh.centurytel.net (HELO thor.local) (brett?schwarz@209.206.248.93 with plain) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 15:42:40 -0000 Subject: Re: Views in pgaccess From: Brett Schwarz To: Rene Kiessig Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <012a01c2558d$4e1cdfa0$330b080a@gen15> References: <012a01c2558d$4e1cdfa0$330b080a@gen15> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 09 Sep 2002 08:39:32 -0700 Message-Id: <1031585973.11050.45.camel@thor> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200209/51 X-Sequence-Number: 3112 On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 03:08, Rene Kiessig wrote: > Hallo, > > had anyone the problem that in pgaccess views are not listed? > I use the PostgreSQL DB with linux and I created views within pgaccess as well as with psql. > In both cases they are not listed in pgaccess. > For me it is not so important, but the users would like to have it. > I tried a newer version, but the same problem occured. > Has anyone a solution or ideas what I could do or had even anyone the same problem? > Which *newer* version did you try? From CVS? What version of PostgreSQL are you using also? --brett -- Brett Schwarz brett_schwarz AT yahoo.com