Received: from mail.tableaudebord.fr ([195.5.227.203]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e7UBhgC02041 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 07:43:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [195.5.227.35] by mail.tableaudebord.fr (NTMail 5.06.0016/NY8816.00.45723995) with ESMTP id pvibaaaa for pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:53:46 +0200 Message-ID: <013401c01277$ebee8720$23e305c3@pcdaniel> From: "Daniel Rosenberg" To: Subject: Re: JDBC and java.sql.Timestamp Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:46:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0131_01C01288.AF668E40" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Archive-Number: 200008/200 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0131_01C01288.AF668E40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I completely agree with Joseph and Bryan (I have the same problem than Brya= n). We are 30th of August and still nothing Do you intend to release a next RPM version 7.0.3 and a new .jar for the Dr= iver which fixes the bug on Timestamp? When? The official jdbc homepage is http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/ but it appears to be the 7.0 driver. Peter? Moreover, I suggest to create a link from http://www.postgresql.org/sites.h= tml to=20 http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/ because it's not so clear when searching= the latest driver. Regard, Daniel _______________________________________ Daniel Rosenberg - drosenberg@audientia.com ________________________________________ Also, because I've been busy the last few months, I've not done anything since 7.0 was released. I'm spending Monday catching up with the major outstanding stuff with JDBC, and will get a compiled copy online. Peter -- Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk, me@petermount.com Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/ Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Shraibman" To: Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 8:29 PM Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and java.sql.Timestamp > I'm thinking it would justify a 7.0.3 release of postgres just to keep > the traffic about the Timestamp off the mailing list. > > Bryan Field-Elliot wrote: > > > > Using the latest stable postgres and JDBC drivers, I am having a problem > > which I have seen mentioned here previously; namely, that after inserting a > > row with a Timestamp column, and while attempting to retrieve it again (via > > JDBC), I get exceptions; I believe this is due to a bug in the format string > > in the jdbc client. > > > > Some have mentioned that a fix is available in CVS, but (believe or not) I > > am newbie enough to have not yet used CVS or know how to retrieve patches > > via it. > > > > Is there a released (downloadable, even RPM-downloadable) version of the > > JDBC driver with the Timestamp issue fixed? > > > The official jdbc homepage is http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/ but it > appears to be the 7.0 driver. Peter? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Bryan ------=_NextPart_000_0131_01C01288.AF668E40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I completely agree with Joseph and Bryan (= I have=20 the same problem than Bryan).
We are 30th of August and still=20 nothing
 
Do you intend to release a next RPM version 7.0.3 and a new .jar for t= he=20 Driver which fixes the bug on Timestamp?
When?
The official jdbc homepage is http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres= /=20 but it
appears to be the 7.0 driver. Peter?
Moreover, I suggest to cr= eate=20 a link from http://www.postgresql.org/sit= es.html to=20
http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres= / =20 because it's not so clear when searching the latest driver.
 
Regard,
 
Daniel
 
_______________________________________Daniel=20 Rosenberg - drosenberg@audientia.com
________________________________________
Also, because I've been busy the last few = months,=20 I've not done anything
since 7.0 was released. I'm spending Monday catch= ing=20 up with the major
outstanding stuff with JDBC, and will get a compiled c= opy=20 online.

Peter

--
Peter T Mount  peter@retep.org.uk,= =20 me@petermount.com
Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact detai= ls: http://petermount.com
PostgreSQL JDB= C: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres= /
Java=20 PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
-= ----=20 Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Shraibman"=20 <jks@selectacast.net>
To:=20 <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 8:= 29=20 PM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and java.sql.Timestamp


>= I'm=20 thinking it would justify a 7.0.3 release of postgres just to keep
> = the=20 traffic about the Timestamp off the mailing list.
>
> Bryan=20 Field-Elliot wrote:
> >
> > Using the latest stable postg= res=20 and JDBC drivers, I am having a problem
> > which I have seen ment= ioned=20 here previously; namely, that after
inserting a
> > row with a= =20 Timestamp column, and while attempting to retrieve it again
(via
>= >=20 JDBC), I get exceptions; I believe this is due to a bug in the=20 format
string
> > in the jdbc client.
> >
> >= Some=20 have mentioned that a fix is available in CVS, but (believe or not)
I>=20 > am newbie enough to have not yet used CVS or know how to=20 retrieve
patches
> > via it.
> >
> > Is there= a=20 released (downloadable, even RPM-downloadable) version of the
> > = JDBC=20 driver with the Timestamp issue fixed?
> >
> The official jd= bc=20 homepage is http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres= /=20 but it
> appears to be the 7.0 driver. Peter?
>
>
>= >=20 Thanks in advance,
> >
> >=20 Bryan
------=_NextPart_000_0131_01C01288.AF668E40--