Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBRIiuL37099; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 13:44:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from aalang@rutgersinsurance.com) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA18328; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 13:49:26 -0500 Message-ID: <014301c07035$5bfda120$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" , "PostgreSQL-interfaces" References: <200012270556.AAA19258@candle.pha.pa.us> <00b801c07021$7b33d500$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006> <3A4A20EB.18B939D4@joerdens.de> Subject: Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 13:46:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Archive-Number: 200012/229 X-Sequence-Number: 575 I thought I saw mention on the interfaces list that the ODBC driver needed to be modified to properly use the large objects. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Joerdens" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: "Bruce Momjian" ; "PostgreSQL-development" ; "PostgreSQL-interfaces" Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 12:03 PM Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] PHP and PostgreSQL > Adam Lang wrote: > > > > I'd say the most important thing would be to get it upto speed with 7.1. > > Make sure PHP supports large objects and the TOAST properly. > > What would be the problem there? As I understand TOAST, the application shouldn't take any > notice of it's inner workings whatsoever . . . also, I've used TOAST with PHP (i.e. I've > managed to insert more than 8 k into a row with the rowsize set to 8 k), without any > trouble. I don't know about large objects but as I heard, the interface didn't change?! > > - Frank