Received: from tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts8.bellnexxia.net
	[209.226.175.52])
	by hub.org (8.10.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9PFDWO77969
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:13:32 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from karkalis@earthling.net)
Received: from killer ([64.229.48.150]) by tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net
	(InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
	id <20001025151327.PDGJ625.tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net@killer>;
	Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:13:27 -0400
Message-ID: <020b01c03e96$674d2760$0382a8c0@metavera.com>
From: "Tony Simopoulos" <karkalis@earthling.net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
References: 
 <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B461@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk>
	<4983.972391441@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects 
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:15:26 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Archive-Number: 200010/208
X-Sequence-Number: 1565

sorry,

i must have missed something.  when did outer join's start working?  is there a patch that i can build?

tonys.

> That's a good thought.  It'd be a useful practice to review such
> standard queries from time to time anyway.  For example, now that
> outer joins work, a lot of psql's backslash-command queries could
> be simplified (don't need the UNION ALL WITH SELECT NULL hack).
> 
> Anyone have time to work up a list?
> 
> regards, tom lane