Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eA1IMCl83134 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:22:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from aalang@rutgersinsurance.com) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA05290 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:27:13 -0500 Message-ID: <020f01c04430$fc2b77c0$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A26FB@woody.vale-housing.co.uk> Subject: Re: Connecting remotely. Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:24:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Archive-Number: 200011/20 X-Sequence-Number: 56 So in other words I should have a client that talks to a server application, which in turn talks to the database? Again, this n-tier stuff is nice if the person writing the app has to do it independent of a back end, but when you are writing for a specific instances, all it seems to do is make things harder... Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Page" To: "'Adam Lang'" ; Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 12:15 PM Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > > Sent: 01 November 2000 16:40 > > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org > > Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely. > > > > > > What's the difference between having the client use ADO to talk to the > > database as opposed to an interface using the postgresql > > client libraries? > > > > Nothing, I would say. In my mind, Sergio is saying that any app written with > libpq or libpq++ or any other interface that doesn't include some kind of > middleware is broken. Surely that would include psql, pgAccess, pgAdmin, > anything using ODBC written in C or VB or C++? > > Or have I missed the point completely? > > Regards, > Dave. > > > > > > "Adam Lang" el día Wed, 1 Nov > > 2000 09:52:35 > > > -0500, escribió: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > >What are people's thoughts? > > > > > > people's thoughts are that you really want to design a multi-thier > > > design (for example a 3 layer design), where > > > > > > / client1 (browser) > > > database <---> bussines rules - client2 (browser) > > > (ie. apache, php,...) \ ..... > > > > > > > > > if your client has direct access to the database, you > > design is broken... > > > > > > sergio > >