Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C059FB355;
	Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:10:06 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 00826-04; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:09:46 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from smtp.guitar.ocn.ne.jp (guitar.ocn.ne.jp [61.207.12.174])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272289FB20D;
	Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:09:52 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from SJ157 (221x112x108x194.ap221.ftth.ucom.ne.jp [221.112.108.194])
	by smtp.guitar.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 5543A4EEF; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:09:50 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <037d01c77079$91ea65c0$c701a8c0@wiseknot.local>
From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Sean Davis" <sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>,
	<pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>, <pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org>
References: <4606AC15.90406@mail.nih.gov>
	<200703270631.30705.sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>
	<026e01c77067$58a10b00$c701a8c0@wiseknot.local>
	<200703270817.46083.sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>
	<033501c77076$3fdd0650$c701a8c0@wiseknot.local>
	<19439.1175004266@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [ODBC] ODBC for Mac OS 
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:09:44 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.087 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50,
	SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200703/41
X-Sequence-Number: 6482

Hi.

From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp> writes:
>> As for either of your this result, it is strange. ?_?
>> Makefile.ac seems not to be developed correctly. 
>> -lpq has the mechanism that any development is allotted....
> 
> Hmm, broken autoconf or automake?  But he said he got the same
> results on other machines ...

Ahh Yes.. Therefore, I am looking at his config.log now.
Please give the inspection time for a while...

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito