Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B62475807
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:26:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mta4.snet.net (mta4.snet.net [204.60.203.76])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A903474E49
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:26:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pop.snet.net ([204.60.203.73])
	by mta4.snet.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SNET-mx-1.2/D-1.1.1.1/O-1.1.1.1) with
	ESMTP id g7CNQ0IN013795 for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:26:00 -0400 (EDT)
X-Originating-IP: [64.252.95.167]
X-SBCIS-MTA: [pop.snet.net]
Received: from [192.168.1.83] (167.95.252.64.snet.net [64.252.95.167])
	by pop.snet.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SNET-pop-1.2/D-1.1.1.1/O-1.1.1.1) with
	ESMTP id g7CNQBT0000715 for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:26:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Is this valid?
From: Wei Weng <wweng@kencast.com>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 12 Aug 2002 19:26:12 -0400
Message-Id: <1029194773.28202.1.camel@Monet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200208/32
X-Sequence-Number: 2994

I am not sure if this is the right mailing list I talk to. Please let me
know if I had violated any unwritten rules. :)

I have a global variable PGconn* m_pgconn that is the connection handle
for connecting to the postgresql database. Can I access/use the handle
from multiple threads? Say I have a thread that does some insertion
through this handle/database connection(m_pgconn) and also another
thread that do some insertion *on the same table* through this
handle(m_pgconn), will that break?

Thanks

-- 
Wei Weng
Network Software Engineer
KenCast Inc.