X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF0F475B8C; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:31:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from bob.samurai.com (bob.samurai.com [205.207.28.75]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612DC475A45; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:31:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from DU150.N224.ResNet.QueensU.CA (DU150.N224.ResNet.QueensU.CA [130.15.224.150]) by bob.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316531DC4; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:31:38 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgresql 7.3 versus 7.2 From: Neil Conway To: Tom Lane Cc: Robert Treat , Ulf Rehmann , PostgreSQL Hackers , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <13483.1045150947@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <1045144176.12930.438.camel@camel> <13483.1045150947@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1045153888.16760.12.camel@tokyo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Date: 13 Feb 2003 11:31:28 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200302/51 X-Sequence-Number: 3672 On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 10:42, Tom Lane wrote: > I think he'll have trouble even with that :-( ... 7.3 pg_dump will try > to use column-name-list syntax in its COPY commands, which the 7.2 > server won't like. If you used an insert-only, data-only dump, that might work... Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC