X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Received: from jester.inquent.com (unknown [216.208.117.7]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5733247592C; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:15:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jester.inquent.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2AJEwee035975; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:14:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rbt@rbt.ca) Subject: Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign From: Rod Taylor To: Justin Clift Cc: Tom Lane , PostgreSQL Development In-Reply-To: <3E6CE1F2.8030302@postgresql.org> References: <19041.1047322279@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3E6CE1F2.8030302@postgresql.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xM1pGpsN410xUycVoO09" Organization: Message-Id: <1047323698.99075.23.camel@jester> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 10 Mar 2003 14:14:58 -0500 X-Archive-Number: 200303/366 X-Sequence-Number: 36612 --=-xM1pGpsN410xUycVoO09 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > + Not sure where Satoshi is up to with his 2 phase commit proposal, but= =20 > that might make sense to incorporate into a wire protocol revision.=20 > From memory he received funding to work on it, so it might be coming=20 > along nicely. One should note that his protocol changes had absolutely nothing to do with 2 phase commits -- but were used as a marker to direct replication. We may want to consider leaving some space for a server / server style communication (Cluster ID, etc.) --=20 Rod Taylor PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc --=-xM1pGpsN410xUycVoO09 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+bOQy6DETLow6vwwRAmVOAJ9DNj3V9vozb9DK0T0VatXIHckIIACeN+5A 7c/18dKpFdOy4T3ZlhfXDRA= =uAxh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xM1pGpsN410xUycVoO09--