X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77082D1C4CA for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:41:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10227-04 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 06:40:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.ruhr.de (in-ruhr4.ruhr.de [212.23.134.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADE51D1C4BF for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 06:41:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 30783 invoked by uid 10); 8 Aug 2003 09:41:34 -0000 Received: (from hph@localhost) by hphbbs.localnet (8.11.6/8.8.7) id h789f3225293; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:41:03 +0200 Subject: pgSQL, ODBC and SERIAL (autoincrement) ... From: Heinz-Peter Heidinger To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-9.7x.1) Date: 08 Aug 2003 11:40:58 +0200 Message-Id: <1060335658.23542.14.camel@hphbbs> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200308/39 X-Sequence-Number: 4393 Hello everybody, I just have a simple question: Do ODBC-interfases (unixODBC or the one supplied with pgSQL) provide facts on the ODBC-side (probably due to one or more ODBC-calls) that one deals with 'auto-increment' columns? (SERIALs et. al) Best regards, Peter Heidinger -- #--------- H.P. Heidinger, Steeler Str. 121, 45138 Essen /Germany ----------# # Tel: +49-201: 8903091 (ISDN) # 287802 (voice) # 287803 (analog data/FAX) # Web-Page: http://Heinz-Peter.Heidinger.bei.T-Online.de # -------------------- MicroSoft Pollution Survivor -------------------------