X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08588D1D3DC; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:48:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82509-03; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 01:48:09 -0400 (AST) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE562D1B484; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 01:48:07 -0400 (AST) Received: from ipv6-allhosts (c-24-16-143-140.client.comcast.net[24.16.143.140]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20040218054807013007o6ffe>; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:48:07 +0000 Subject: Re: Need new project admin for unbundled Tcl interface From: Brett Schwarz To: Bruce Momjian Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , L J Bayuk , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <200402180357.i1I3vZK02711@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200402180357.i1I3vZK02711@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1077083258.1320.19.camel@thor.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 17 Feb 2004 21:47:39 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/57 X-Sequence-Number: 4750 On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 19:57, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, L J Bayuk wrote: > > > > > I offered to take over the Gborg pgtcl project because I thought nobody > > > wanted it. It seemed stalled, having made no releases since beta3 in > > > November 2002, no CVS updates since January 2003, and no progress on the > > > reference manual. I assumed the project admins had moved on to other > > > things and would be glad to turn it over. > > > > > > The response I got was no, they don't want to give it up, but I could > > > join and get CVS commit rights. Not good enough, unless there are going > > > to be releases. I'm not hearing that there will be releases. > > > > If there have been no commits to the gborg version in almost a year, what > > would a new release be based off of? What I'm really curious of is why > > the patches to -core didn't get into gborg ... IMHO, the current gborg > > seems to have gone 'stale' :( > > > > > I really don't want to antagonize anyone, but I think a project fork is > > > in order. I'll put my version into a new project, and we'll see what > > > happens. > > > > Well, that works too ... since I know the gborg version is not in sync > > with the -core version, and since I think that bringing gborg in sync with > > -core would be confusing at best ... if you can create the project, I can > > Why confusing? Add core changes to gborg, remove the core version, and > submit patches to improve the gborg version. > I agree, I am not sure why it would be confusing. There's really not been that many updates to the -core version in the past year or so.