To: Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: this mailing list is proposed to be retired 
In-reply-to: <18071eea0903251747x650baa68hd7800958be301985@mail.gmail.com> 
References: <200807081502.58572.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<20090325215034.GA3137@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<18071eea0903251747x650baa68hd7800958be301985@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com>
	message dated "Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:47:48 -0000"
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:23:06 -0400
Message-ID: <11010.1238030586@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com> writes:
> I find it amusing that "low traffic" implies some level of
> irrelevancy.  What a load of tosh.  This list has a purpose, it
> *serves* that purpose, and does so well.

Not counting this thread itself, since January 1 this list has had
22 posts, all but five of which were demonstrably off-topic (assuming
that that Javascript thread in January should have been on pgsql-jdbc).
Of the five, three were a single thread about ECPG, and the other two
were questions that went unanswered.  So in other words, there's been
*one* effective, on-topic exchange in three months here, and a much
larger volume of stuff that should have gone somewhere else.

The list looks pretty moribund to me :-(.

			regards, tom lane