X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278E59DCABF for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:28:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21258-10 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:28:07 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8BB9DC960 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:28:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1MES14Z011286; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:28:01 -0500 (EST) To: Peter Eisentraut cc: "Magnus Hagander" , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, "Christoph Zwerschke" Subject: Re: Finding the pqlib version In-reply-to: <200602221344.27931.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F7CB@algol.sollentuna.se> <5341.1140563865@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200602221344.27931.peter_e@gmx.net> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:44:26 +0100" Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:28:01 -0500 Message-ID: <11285.1140618481@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.11 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.110] X-Spam-Score: 0.11 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200602/69 X-Sequence-Number: 6033 Peter Eisentraut writes: > Am Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2006 00:17 schrieb Tom Lane: >> Yes. pg_config started as strictly support for add-on makefiles but >> it's evolved into something more than that. I'd vote for just dropping >> it into the base package. >> >> (Memo to self: should probably rearrange the Red Hat RPMs likewise.) > What would be the base package in that? postgresql-nvr ... I wouldn't stick it in -libs if that's what you were wondering. regards, tom lane