Received: from holmes.infopro.spb.su (holmes.infopro.spb.su [195.242.2.2]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA75576 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 12:52:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from avm@webclub.ru) Received: from barrymore.peterlink.ru (barrymore.peterlink.ru [195.242.2.8]) by holmes.infopro.spb.su (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA26847 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:52:03 +0300 (MSK) Received: from 192.168.0.3 (spb-2-78.dialup.peterlink.ru [195.242.11.78]) by barrymore.peterlink.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA24663 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:52:01 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:51:44 +0300 From: "Alexey V. Meledin" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.36) S/N F29DEE5D / Educational Reply-To: "Alexey V. Meledin" Organization: InterForge Developers Group, Spb X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <11869.991201@webclub.ru> To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Perfomance Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! Where I can greater perfomance: a. Using cursors when quering large SELECT b. or using interface library buffer (php for example)? and why? PS: Where can I read more about this? Thanks, Alexey V. Meledin InterForge Developers Group, Saint-Petersburg look_to: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mail_to: >>>