Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [206.210.65.6]) by hub.org
	(8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id OAA17191;
	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 14:43:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA12981;
	Thu, 30 Apr 1998 14:42:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: Phil Thompson <phil@river-bank.demon.co.uk>
cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes 
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 30 Apr 1998 18:21:17 +0000
	<3548C11D.BE04EDC4@river-bank.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 14:42:58 -0400
Message-ID: <12979.893961778@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Phil Thompson <phil@river-bank.demon.co.uk> writes:
> I've misunderstood the protocol - and the protocol specification is
> therefore wrong (or at least incomplete) in this respect.  Do you want
> to fix the spec and include your enhancements or shall I?

Yes, there are some things I thought were wrong in the programmer's guide
chapter about the FE/BE protocol.  I'd be happy to submit revised text.

I haven't paid any attention yet to how the documentation is handled.
Is the stuff in the distribution under doc/src/sgml considered the
editable master text, or is it generated from some other format?
Do I need to subscribe to pgsql-docs to find out what to do? :-)

			regards, tom lane