X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EA4474E4F
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:50:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2LFntub013160;
	Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:49:55 -0500 (EST)
To: Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign 
In-reply-to: <1048254862.1112.125.camel@inspiron.cramers> 
References: <200303201613.h2KGDGJ06549@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<1048254862.1112.125.camel@inspiron.cramers>
Comments: In-reply-to Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com>
	message dated "21 Mar 2003 08:54:22 -0500"
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:49:54 -0500
Message-ID: <13159.1048261794@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200303/912
X-Sequence-Number: 37158

Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> I am wondering if it would be possible to return the value of the first
> serial field in the row that was incremented on an insert ?

That's a language issue, not a protocol issue, and no I'm not taking it
on for 7.4.

			regards, tom lane