Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2FFobx21306
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:50:37 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2FFoCt13835;
	Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:50:13 -0500 (EST)
To: "J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv@cistron-office.nl>
cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= EVEILLARD <steff33@ifrance.com>,
	pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Big trouble with libpq++ 
In-reply-to: <20010315133432.E6118@cistron.nl> 
References: <007b01c0ad1b$1be5ef70$1001000a@arianeii.com>
	<20010315130713.C6118@cistron.nl>
	<008e01c0ad4c$c05aa6a0$1001000a@arianeii.com>
	<20010315133432.E6118@cistron.nl>
Comments: In-reply-to "J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv@cistron-office.nl>
	message dated "Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:34:32 +0100"
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:50:12 -0500
Message-ID: <13832.984671412@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200103/135
X-Sequence-Number: 1296

"J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv@cistron-office.nl> writes:
> You should be able to solve this either by linking dynamically, or if you
> want to stick with the static version, to link with libpq as well as libpq++.

Yes, for a static link you should say
	-lpq++ -lpq
not only -lpq++.  Actually, I'd tend to do that for a dynamic link
too... can't hurt.

			regards, tom lane