Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f27Micx92392 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 17:44:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f27MiW914374; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 17:44:33 -0500 (EST) To: "J. T. Vermeulen" cc: Bruce Momjian , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: libpq++ In-reply-to: <20010307232031.H3900@cistron.nl> References: <20010307205247.E3900@cistron.nl> <200103072202.RAA02078@candle.pha.pa.us> <20010307232031.H3900@cistron.nl> Comments: In-reply-to "J. T. Vermeulen" message dated "Wed, 07 Mar 2001 23:20:31 +0100" Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 17:44:32 -0500 Message-ID: <14371.984005072@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200103/74 X-Sequence-Number: 1235 "J. T. Vermeulen" writes: > Will do. Can I take it there have been no other changes between 7.0.3 > and 7.2 as far as libpq++ is concerned, so I can continue to work with > the version I have? No, you shouldn't take it. For one thing, Peter E. has been reorganizing the configure/build process, and that has impacted pretty nearly everything. The changes aren't likely to be extensive, but you'd still be facing a merge task when you are ready to submit diffs. Seems like you might as well try to avoid that by starting from something more current than 7.0.3. 7.1beta5 would probably be a reasonable starting point. regards, tom lane