Received: from postgresql.org.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with SMTP id f44J2RA00930
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 4 May 2001 15:02:27 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from pgsql-interfaces-owner@postgresql.org)
Received: from idoru.tricord.com ([64.240.27.94])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f43L6LA02148
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 3 May 2001 17:06:22 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from justinb@tricord.com)
Received: (from justinb@localhost)
	by idoru.tricord.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA29330;
	Thu, 3 May 2001 16:05:43 -0500
From: Justin Banks <justinb@tricord.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15089.51239.362206.595914@idoru.tricord.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 16:05:43 -0500 (CDT)
X-no-archive: yes
Reply-To: justinb@tricord.com
X-Supreme-Numerical-Value: Bleen
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: justinb@tricord.com, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Re: libpq++ 
In-Reply-To: <818.988918936@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <200105031915.f43JFpf12056@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<299.988917936@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<15089.45940.490466.456420@idoru.tricord.com>
	<818.988918936@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
X-Archive-Number: 200105/20
X-Sequence-Number: 1546

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

  Tom> And what's wrong with a static class variable for that purpose?  The
  Tom> shmem segment looks like the hardest possible way to get the same
  Tom> result.

I'm kinda embarrased to say I didn't think of that, actually. That would only
mean exposing the default constructor of PgDatabase, so the derived class
could put off connecting indefinitely, right?

-justinb

-- 
Justin Banks Tricord, Inc. justinb@tricord.com
<Randomly selected signature here>