Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f55DxoE16191
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:59:50 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f55DuFR15104;
	Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:56:15 -0400 (EDT)
To: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
cc: "'Ashley Clark'" <aclark@ghoti.org>,
	Cedar Cox <cedarc@visionforisrael.com>, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: What is the difference between the two MSI insta llers? 
In-reply-to: <8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A2BBE@woody.vale-housing.co.uk>
References: <8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A2BBE@woody.vale-housing.co.uk>
Comments: In-reply-to Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
	message dated "Tue, 05 Jun 2001 08:43:14 +0100"
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 09:56:15 -0400
Message-ID: <15101.991749375@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200106/19
X-Sequence-Number: 1681

Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> I've been seeing some wierdness with my local mirror recently too
> (postgresql.rmplc.co.uk).

I think this is resolved now, and the mirrors should drop old files
at their next rsync run (ie, within a day or so) --- see thread on
pghackers if you care about details.

			regards, tom lane