X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565C74793A0
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 31 Jan 2003 21:00:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4713E47DF97
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:08:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1108p5u001580;
	Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:08:52 -0500 (EST)
To: Gerhard Hintermayer <g.hintermayer@inode.at>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, lbayuk@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: still memory leaks with libpgtcl 
In-reply-to: <b0mscn$1iko$1@news.hub.org> 
References: <as0da6$2njk$1@news.hub.org> <auhq8v$2iuo$1@news.hub.org>
	<auj41k$f4v$1@news.hub.org> <avf32e$rep$1@news.hub.org>
	<avg4mq$1ikp$1@news.hub.org>
	<bd4db85f.0301160134.499958fb@posting.google.com>
	<b0mscn$1iko$1@news.hub.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Gerhard Hintermayer <g.hintermayer@inode.at>
	message dated "Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:39:30 +0100"
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:08:51 -0500
Message-ID: <1579.1044058131@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200301/121
X-Sequence-Number: 3621

Gerhard Hintermayer <g.hintermayer@inode.at> writes:
> I found out (actually it was Joe English from TCT), that the segfault
> was due to an error in tk (Bug #671330). So I see no reason, why the
> above patch should'nt be applied to further releases. I have running
> lot's of scripts with the above patch and not having any problem with
> both memory leaks or segfaults.

Okay, I've applied this patch into CVS head and also REL7_3 branch.
It'll be in PG 7.3.2.

			regards, tom lane