Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D470347658C for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:14:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9702F4763E4 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:10:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9LD9vhR016421; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:09:57 -0400 (EDT) To: "Uday" Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PGLOG problem In-reply-to: <006c01c278c2$9bbdf020$2664a8c0@uday> References: <006c01c278c2$9bbdf020$2664a8c0@uday> Comments: In-reply-to "Uday" message dated "Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:57:46 +0530" Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:09:56 -0400 Message-ID: <16420.1035205796@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200210/67 X-Sequence-Number: 3229 "Uday" writes: > A simple question but since I'm not very conversant with PG if someone can = > help me about how to reduce the size of the "pg_log" file I have on my mail= > server database. Update to PG 7.2.3. regards, tom lane